Method of making wall-flow monolith filter

Plastic and nonmetallic article shaping or treating: processes – Outside of mold sintering or vitrifying of shaped inorganic... – Producing microporous article

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C264S630000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06803015

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to ceramic wall-flow filters and methods of making them. In particular, the invention relates to particulate traps, such as diesel particulate traps.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
As air quality standards become more stringent, considerable efforts have focused on minimizing the particulate matter emitted in diesel engine exhaust. A potential solution is a particulate trap inserted in the exhaust system of a diesel engine.
A honeycomb ceramic wall-flow through filter, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,276,071, has become the preferred type of particulate trap. These honeycomb filters are made by extruding a paste comprised of water, binder and ceramic powders (e.g., clay, mullite, silica, silicon carbide and alumina) that form, for example, cordierite upon firing. Clays or water soluble binders are generally used to make the paste sufficiently plastic to form useable honeycombs. After the paste is extruded, the honeycomb is dried, debindered and sintered to form a honeycomb. The honeycomb is sintered, typically, to give sufficient strength to the thin channel walls to survive insertion of a ceramic paste to plug the channels, as described next.
Finally, to make the wall-flow particulate trap or filter, one half of the openings of one end of the sintered honeycomb are plugged with a paste comprised of a suitable powder, dispersion medium and binder. Then, on the other end, the channels not already plugged are plugged with the paste. Subsequently, the plugged honeycomb is sintered again to form the wall-flow particulate trap.
Unfortunately, this method suffers from a number of problems. For example, the liquid in the paste may be drawn into the porous walls of the fired honeycomb preferentially causing non-uniform drying shrinkage of the plug and ultimately cracks in the plug. A second problem is the necessity for multiple expensive steps (e.g., at least two high temperature firings) to manufacture the particulate trap. These multiple steps are typically needed because the walls of a green ceramic honeycomb are thin and fragile they tend to deform and/or break when inserting the paste, which is particularly true when using a large scale process. Another problem is the limited compositions that may be used for the plug, due to the expansion of the fired honeycomb during the sintering shrinkage of the plug.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a method for making wall-flow traps, for example, that avoids one or more of the problems of the prior art, such as one of those described above.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is a method of plugging channels in a ceramic honeycomb comprising:
(a) forming a mixture comprised of a dispersing liquid and ceramic powder,
(b) inserting the mixture at one end of the channel in an unplugged ceramic honeycomb, such that the mixture flows to the other end where the mixture collects and forms a plugged ceramic honeycomb and
(c) heating the plugged ceramic honeycomb to a temperature sufficient to sinter the plugged ceramic honeycomb to form a porous sintered plugged ceramic honeycomb.
The method is particularly useful, but not limited to, plugging of channels in honeycomb wall-flow filters. Surprisingly, these methods may be used to not only plug the channels, but also simultaneously provide a discriminating layer, for example, on the walls of the outlet channels of a ceramic honeycomb wall-flow filter. The method may also be used to provide other useful materials on or in the walls of the filter (e.g., a catalyst or nucleation agent) of a channel, while simultaneously forming the plugs.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4041591 (1977-08-01), Noll et al.
patent: 4200604 (1980-04-01), Dziedzic et al.
patent: 4276071 (1981-06-01), Outland
patent: 4293357 (1981-10-01), Higuchi et al.
patent: 4340403 (1982-07-01), Higuchi et al.
patent: 4364760 (1982-12-01), Higuchi et al.
patent: 4364761 (1982-12-01), Berg et al.
patent: 4403008 (1983-09-01), Factor
patent: 4411856 (1983-10-01), Montierth
patent: 4417908 (1983-11-01), Pitcher, Jr.
patent: 4420316 (1983-12-01), Frost et al.
patent: 4423090 (1983-12-01), Hammond et al.
patent: 4427728 (1984-01-01), Belmonte et al.
patent: 4432918 (1984-02-01), Paisley
patent: 4455180 (1984-06-01), Hillman et al.
patent: 4509966 (1985-04-01), Dimick et al.
patent: 4522668 (1985-06-01), Ogawa et al.
patent: 4557773 (1985-12-01), Bonzo
patent: 4557962 (1985-12-01), Belmonte et al.
patent: 4559193 (1985-12-01), Ogawa et al.
patent: 4573896 (1986-03-01), Bonzo
patent: 4643749 (1987-02-01), Miura
patent: 4682911 (1987-07-01), Moreland
patent: 4759892 (1988-07-01), Bonzo
patent: 5021204 (1991-06-01), Frost et al.
patent: 5062911 (1991-11-01), Hampton et al.
patent: 5194078 (1993-03-01), Yonemura et al.
patent: 5198007 (1993-03-01), Moyer et al.
patent: 5332703 (1994-07-01), Hickman
patent: 5364573 (1994-11-01), Noky
patent: 5433904 (1995-07-01), Noky
patent: 5720787 (1998-02-01), Kasai et al.
patent: 5766393 (1998-06-01), Nishimura et al.
patent: 5846276 (1998-12-01), Nagai et al.
patent: 6200483 (2001-03-01), Cutler et al.
patent: 6206944 (2001-03-01), Hickman
patent: 6251473 (2001-06-01), Wang et al.
patent: 2002/0066982 (2002-06-01), Yamaguchi et al.
patent: 2002/0135107 (2002-09-01), Nishi et al
patent: 2002/0175451 (2002-11-01), Vance et al.
patent: 2003/0024220 (2003-02-01), Ishihara et al.
patent: 2003/0161945 (2003-08-01), Allen et al.
patent: 09-220423 (1997-08-01), None
patent: WO 94/22556 (1994-10-01), None
Rejection dated Sep. 10, 2003 for United States Application 10/131,670 filed Apr. 23, 2002 (Dow Reference: 61193A).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method of making wall-flow monolith filter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method of making wall-flow monolith filter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of making wall-flow monolith filter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3305277

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.