Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 ser – Synthetic resins – Cellular products or processes of preparing a cellular...
Reexamination Certificate
2003-03-19
2004-08-31
Cooney, John M. (Department: 1711)
Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 ser
Synthetic resins
Cellular products or processes of preparing a cellular...
C521S130000, C521S170000, C521S174000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06784218
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The subject invention relates to a method of forming high resilience slabstock polyurethane foam having random cell structures and displaying physical properties superior to latex foam while exhibiting latex-like feel and characteristics.
2. Description of the Related Art
The use of latex foam in high price, high quality mattresses has been common in the United States for several years, although market share has remained relatively low. Latex foam maintains a much higher share of the mattress materials market in Europe, because latex foam is considered to be a superior product with respect to its comfort and durability properties. Recently, U.S. consumers have been developing a higher sensitivity to sleep habits and a direct association between bedding quality and the quality of sleep. The mattress industry is focused on creating more specialized, higher price, higher quality products resulting in the growth of the latex foam share of mattress cushion materials. Traditionally, latex foam has been shown to display superior resilience, support factor, dynamic and static fatigue resistance when compared to polyurethane foam for cushioning applications. Additionally, latex foam is often advertised to provide superior pressure relief particularly in bedding applications. However, these comparisons have also typically been made between different densities of foam, i.e., 4.2 pcf density Latex foam vs. 2.5 pcf density HR polyurethane foam, while each has a hardness 28 lb. IFD at 25% deflection. Polyurethane foam is not typically formulated in the same density ranges as latex foam for cushion applications with the intention of meeting the significantly marketable differences between urethane and latex. The industry is also focused on finding other materials that perform and feel like these latex foams, such as high resilience polyurethane foams.
High resilience polyurethane foams are produced by reacting an isocyanate with an isocyanate-reactive component containing two or more reactive sites, generally in the presence of blowing agent(s), catalysts, surfactants and other auxiliary additives. The isocyanate-reactive components are typically polyols, polyesters, primary and secondary polyamines, or water. The catalysts used during the preparation of slabstock polyurethane foam promote two major reactions among the reactants, gelling and blowing. These reactions must proceed simultaneously and at a competitively balanced rate during the process in order to yield slabstock polyurethane foam with desired physical characteristics. Flexible slabstock foams are generally open-celled materials, which may require additional processing, such as crushing, to reach a desired openness.
Slabstock foam is produced in a foam machine that mixes the individual reactants, i.e., isocyanate, isocyanate-reactive components, and additives, in a continuous manner through a mix head and deposits the reaction product into a trough. The product begins to froth and rise out of the trough and overflows onto fall plates. On the fall plates, the product continues to rise and contacts a conveyor. The product cures as the conveyor carries it along a length forming the slabstock polyurethane foam. The conveyors are typically lined with a paper or plastic liner to allow for easy removal of the slabstock foam. As the foam exits the machine, it is cut into large blocks.
Various related art patents disclose methods of forming slabstock polyurethane foams. These methods include using blowing agents such as water, air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,403,088. Typically, carbon dioxide liquid is added directly to the polyol component; however, it is also known in the art that it can be added to either or both components. The polyol component supply must be pressurized to maintain the carbon dioxide in the liquid state. As the product exits the mix head and as it froths and rises, the carbon dioxide changes states from a liquid to a gas and acts as a blowing agent. One primary reason for adding the carbon dioxide in a liquid state is to ensure that there is a sufficient amount of blowing agent to produce the foam having a desired density. However, one disadvantage of using liquid carbon dioxide is that the polyol component supply must be under pressure, which is expensive and can be dangerous to maintain the high pressures.
Yet another method, shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,360,831, discloses adding carbon dioxide gas as a nucleation gas into either one of the polyol component or the isocyanate component streams for a foam-in-fabric process. The carbon dioxide gas thickens and increases the viscosity of the foaming mass to prevent the reacting components from entering the fine pores of the foam and fabric capsule, which allows these encapsulating materials to remain as is, functional, not compromised. Most importantly, the nucleating gas is thickening the froth to prevent penetration of the foaming mass into the pores of existing foam and fabric, therefore allowing the containing material to remain intact. Foam-in-fabric processes are different from slabstock foam processes in that the foam-in-fabric process is prepared in a batch process and makes only enough foam to fill a mold, whereas the slabstock process involves continuous reacting of the components. Fabric is positioned within the mold, and the components are mixed together and poured into the fabric. The components react, forming a foam that fills the fabric and forms the final product.
The use of other blowing agents, such as nitrogen gas or various other gases, is shown in WO 02/10245. One distinguishing factor between a blowing agent and a nucleation gas is the amount used and the effect that the blowing agent has on the slabstock foam. Typically, when a gas is added as a blowing agent, a large amount of the blowing agent is needed to expand the foam during the frothing and rising stages to control the density of the slabstock foam. The addition of more blowing agents results in a lower density foam.
On the other hand, the related art has used only a single nucleation gas to improve the characteristics of the foam. The nucleation gas, such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, promotes irregular cell structure and reduces processing of the foam, such as crushing, after it has cured. If too much nitrogen gas is added as the nucleation gas, the cells in the slabstock foam are irregular shaped and become too large forming voids or pits in the slabstock foam. If the slabstock foam has too many voids, the slabstock foam loses its resilience and value. If too much carbon dioxide gas is added as the nucleation gas, the cells are too uniform and too dense. The slabstock foam prepared with too much carbon dioxide gas does not have similar physical properties, or performance characteristics, as that of latex foam. The slabstock foam of the related art in using a single nucleation gas has not yet achieved the latex-like feel, while also achieving the performance characteristics associated with the latex foam.
However, to date, the industry has been unable to produce a slabstock polyurethane foam having performance characteristics of latex foam while also having a substantially similar feel to that of the latex foam. Further, the industry has been unable to produce a slabstock polyurethane foam that is substantially free of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and formed solely from diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI). The slabstock polyurethane foams produced from TDI do not have as improved performance characteristics as slabstock polyurethane foams produced from MDI. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,068,790 and 5,480,916 and Patent Cooperation Treaty publication WO 01/32735 disclose using mixtures of TDI and MDI. However, they do not disclose using solely MDI as the isocyanate component to produce the slabstock polyurethane foam having latex-like feel and performance characteristics. Great Britain Patent No. 2,093,852 discloses using an isocyanate component having a mixture of MDI and polymethylene polyphenyl polyisocyanates.
Patent Coo
Apichatachutapan Wassana
Green Todd J.
Mullins James A.
Smiecinski Theodore M.
BASF Corporation
Borrego Fernando A.
Cooney John M.
Howard & Howard
LandOfFree
Method of forming high resilience slabstock polyurethane... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method of forming high resilience slabstock polyurethane..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of forming high resilience slabstock polyurethane... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3328766