Optical: systems and elements – Optical modulator – Light wave temporal modulation
Reexamination Certificate
2001-01-03
2002-03-05
Mai, Huy (Department: 2873)
Optical: systems and elements
Optical modulator
Light wave temporal modulation
C359S223100, C359S296000, C359S298000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06353492
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) mirrors (or micro-mirrors) have been evolving for approximately two decades as part of the drive toward integration of optical and electronic systems, for a range of uses including miniature scanners, optical switches, and video display systems. These structures consist of movable mirrors fabricated by micro-electronic processing techniques on wafer substrates (for example silicon, glass, or gallium arsenide). The torsional micro-mirror typically comprises a mirror and spring assembly suspended over a cavity formed in or on a base. The mirrors are electrically conductive, as is at least one region behind the mirror, affixed to the stationary base, so that an electric field can be formed between the mirror and the base. This field is used to move the mirror with respect to the base. An alternative comprises the use of magnetic materials and magnetic fields to move the mirrors.
Typically the mirror surface consists of either the wafer itself or a deposited layer (metal, semiconductor, or insulator), and generally in the prior art the springs and mirror are formed from the same material (but not in all cases). The mirror and torsion springs are separated from the base by an etch process, resulting in the formation of a cavity between the mirror and base.
For display or image acquisition applications, the goal is to develop compact systems with rapid frame rates (at least 60 Hz) and high resolution, consisting of between 200 and 2000 miniature pixels per line. For scanning system designs in this range, the mirrors should be large (in the range of 200 &mgr;m×200 &mgr;m to 2 mm×2 mm), fast (in the range of between 3 kHz and 60 kHz for resonant devices), and scan a photon beam through a large angle 7 to 40 degrees).
In optical systems that contain very small elements, diffraction by the smallest element may introduce diffraction broadening and deleteriously increase the final pixel size. Enlarging the limiting element reduces this broadening and militates for larger mirrors. However, as mechanical systems get larger (for example, increasing the size of a torsional mirror), they tend to be characterized by greater mass and consequently lower resonant frequency; this resonant frequency sets the scanning speed of the system. A frequency in the range of 5 to 50 kHz is desirable. Prior art mirror designs have been limited by the difficulty inherent in obtaining a high resonant frequency with a large mirror size, free from diffraction broadening effects. In prior art cases in which the mirror mass is made very low to obtain high resonant frequency, the resultant reduction in stiffness of the mirror is a limiting factor in the quality of the reflected image. This problem is exacerbated by the possibility of heating of the mirror by light absorbed in the mirror. Such heating militates for a thick mirror capable of conducting the heat away from the source.
The scanning angle through which the mirror moves determines the number of distinguishable pixels in a display or imaging system. Therefore, a large scanning angle is desirable. Generally in the prior art the scan angle is limited by the presence of electrodes that interfere with mirror motion (but not in all cases).
Electrostatic actuation is the most common method used to drive micro-mirrors. In order to produce a force, a voltage is generated between two electrodes, usually the plates of a parallel plate capacitor, one of which is stationary and the other of which is attached to the mirror as described previously. By making the mirror an electrical conductor, the mirror itself can be made to serve as one of the plates. The force generated for a given voltage depends on the plate area and on the gap between the plates, which may change as the mirror position changes. For torsional mirrors, the important drive parameter is the torque, and the effective torque on the structure is also proportional to the distance between the resultant force and the axis of rotation of the mirror. Thus, a large driving force can be achieved using large capacitor plates and small gaps; by applying the force at a distance from the rotation axis, a large torque may be obtained.
In many prior art designs the criteria for a large deflection angle range tend to be in conflict with the criteria for large driving forces. The deflection angle is limited by the presence of surfaces behind the mirror. An example of a limiting surface would be the bottom of a cavity in the base etched beneath the mirror, or some other substrate on which the mirror is mounted. The maximum angle is achieved when the mirror contacts this backplane, so the small separation between the mirror and the backplane needed for generating adequate electrostatic deflection force limits the maximum angle. Accordingly, in prior art designs in which the mirror is used as one of the drive electrodes and the other electrode is on the backplane, increasing the gap reduces the force or torque obtained at a given voltage. Some prior art designs use electrodes that are offset from the main mirror body and which are connected through actuator linkages, allowing the backplane to be moved further away or even eliminated entirely. Typically, though, these electrodes have smaller active areas and shorter moment arms, which tend to reduce the effective forces and torques as well. Additionally, if as the mirror moves, the gap between the drive electrodes narrows, then the gap still may be a limiting factor for the range of motion of the structure.
A second set of design problems arises in the selection of the mirror. Prior art designs and processes do not permit the mirror to be made from very low mass material without also sacrificing structural rigidity. One of the process limitations is the use of the same material for torsion spring and mirror mass, or the same set of patterning steps for spring and mirror mass. The selection of mirror materials with a view toward the elastic or fatigue properties of the springs restricts the suitability of the material with respect to mirror mass rigidity, and also limits the optical performance of the mirrors.
In 1980, Peterson disclosed a silicon torsional micromachined mirror (U.S. Pat. No. 4,317,611; K. E. Peterson, “Silicon torsional scanning mirror,”) IBM J. Res. Dev., 24(5), 1980, pp. 631-637). Both the mirror and torsion elements were patterned in a thin (134 microns) silicon wafer and retained the full thickness of the wafer. The structure was then bonded to a glass substrate, over a shallow well to allow room for the mirror motion. Actuation of the device was electrostatic. The mirror body was used as one electrode and the other electrodes were placed at the bottom of the well under the mirror. A narrow ridge in the well under the axis of rotation of the mirror was used to eliminate transverse motion of the structure. The manufacturing process for this device was relatively simple, requiring a single patterning step for the silicon and two patterning steps for the glass substrate. Its resonance frequency was about 15 kHz, and at resonance the angular displacement reached about 1°. The limitations of this device are related to the depth of the well. A 2 mm mirror touches the bottom of a 12.5 &mgr;m well at a displacement of 0.7° (1.4° total motion). Increasing the well depth to increase the range of motion is not necessarily desirable, because it proportionally reduces the torque achieved for a given voltage.
Nelson (U.S. Pat. No. 5,233,456), Baker et al (U.S. Pat. No. 5,567,334), Hornbeck (U.S. Pat. No. 5,552,924), and Tregilgas (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,583,688 and 5,600,383) have developed and patented a series of torsional mirror designs and improvements for use in deformable mirror device (DMD) displays. These mirrors are fabricated by surface micromachining, consisting of a series of patterned layers supported by an undisturbed substrate. The DMD display uses an individual mirror at each pixel. The mirrors are therefore designed to be very small, to be operated in a bi-stable mode, and to max
Aquilino Paul Daniel
McClelland Robert William
Rensing Noa More
Spitzer Mark Bradley
Zavracky Paul Martin
Mai Huy
The Microoptical Corporation
Weingarten Schurgin, Gagnebin & Lebovici LLP
LandOfFree
Method of fabrication of a torsional micro-mechanical mirror... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method of fabrication of a torsional micro-mechanical mirror..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of fabrication of a torsional micro-mechanical mirror... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2858001