Method of evaluating the immunological activity of a vaccine

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving antigen-antibody binding – specific binding protein...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S009200, C424S130100, C424S134100, C424S171100, C424S184100, C424S193100, C435S004000, C435S174000, C436S501000, C436S518000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07867715

ABSTRACT:
The invention relates to an in vitro method of evaluating the immunological activity of a vaccine preparation in the form of a mixture of a molecular antigen and a carrier, wherein the mixture comprises a liquid phase and a solid phase, to which at least a part of the antigen is attached, the method comprising the steps ofi) subjecting the vaccine to one or more measurements;andii) using the measurement results to evaluate the immunological activity of the vaccine.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4127385 (1978-11-01), Weeke
patent: WO-9411734 (1994-05-01), None
patent: WO-9948525 (1999-09-01), None
patent: WO-0151926 (2001-07-01), None
patent: WO-2004038417 (2004-05-01), None
Katz, Jonathan B., et al., “In vitro assessment of viral antigen content in inactiviated aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted vaccines”, Journal of Virological Methods, 1989, vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 101-108.
Thraenhart, Olaf, et al., “Standardization of an enzyme immunoassay for the in vitro potency assay of inactivated tissue culture rabies vaccines: determination of the rabies virus glycoprotein with polyclonal antisera”, Journal of Biological Standardization (1989), vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 291-309.
Database WPI, Derwent Publications Ltd., XP002170319, AN 1993-212602, Jul. 7, 1992, Abstract.
Katz, J., “Desorption of Porcine Parvovirus from Aluminum Hydroxide Adjuvant with Subsequent Viral Immunoassay or Hemagglutination Assay”, Veterinary Research Communications, vol. 11, No. 1, 1987, pp. 83-92.
Lacey, C.J.N., et al., “Phase IIa Safety and Immunogenicity of a Therapeutic Vaccine, TA-GW, in Persons with Genital Warts”, Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 179, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 612-618.
Krishnan, Lakshmi, et al., “Archaeosome Vaccine Adjuvants Induce Strong Humoral, Cell-Medicated, and Memory Responses: Comparison to Conventional Liposomes and Alum”, Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, No. 1, Jan. 2000, pp. 54-63.
Desbordes, J., “Problems Raised by Potincy Evaluation of Allergen Preparations”, Developments in Biological Standardization, vol. 29, 1975, pp. 219-226.
Hoffmann, A., et al., “Determination of the allergenic activity of birch pollen and apple prick test solutions by measurement of B-hexosaminidase release from RBL-2H3 cells. Comparison with classical methods in allergen standardization”, Allergy, vol. 54, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 446-454.
HogenEsch, Harm, et al., “Mechanisms of stimulation of the immune response by aluminum adjuvants”, Vaccine, vol. 20, May 31, 2002, pp. S34-S39.
Demoly, P., et al., “Allergen-induced mediator release tests”, Allergy, vol. 58, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 553-558.
Levings, R.L., et a., “In vitro potency assays for nonreplicating veterinary vaccines: comparison to in vivo assays and considerations in assay development”, Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 37, No. 3-4, 1993, pp. 201-219.
Marsh et al., “Studies on ‘Allergoids’ Prepared from Naturally Occurring Allergens,” Immunology, 18, 705 (1970).
Wurtzen et al., “Chemical Modification of Birch Allergen Extract Leads to a Reduction in Allergenicity as well as Immunogenicity,” Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 144:287-295 (2007).
Gehlhar et al., “Characterization of Modified Allergen Extracts by in vitro B-Hexosaminidase Release from Rat Basophils,” Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 136:311-319 (2005).
Corbel et al., “Workshop on Standardisation of Aluminum Adsorbed Vaccines”, Biologicals (1997) 25, 351-353.
Yamamoto et al., “Quantitation of Group-specific α Antigen in Hepatitis B Vaccines by Anti-HBs/a Monoclonal Antibody”, Biologicals (1997) 25, 973-980.
Shi et al., “Detoxification of endotoxin by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant”, Vaccine 19 (2001) 1747-1752.
Maa et al., “Optimization of an Alum-Adsorbed Vaccine Powder Formulation for Epidermal Powder Immunization”, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 20 (2003), No. 7: 969-977.
Shi et al., “Change in the degree of adsorption of proteins by aluminum-containing adjuvants following exposure to interstitial fluid: freshly prepared and aged model vaccines”, Vaccine 20 (2002) 80-85.
Geissler et al., “Quality Control and Stability of Chemically and Physically Modified Allergen Extracts”, Arbeiten aus der Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, 87:191-7 (1994).
Poulsen et al., “Aluminum Hydroxide Adsorbed Allergens Used in Modified RAST”, Allergy (1985), 40, 405-416.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent; Patent No. 1649287; Opponent Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. (May 11, 2009)—14 pages.
Notice to opposition to a European Patent; Patent No. 1649287; Opponent Stallergenes S.A. (May 8, 2009)—42 pages (includes English translation).
Definition of alum adjuvant—National Cancer Institute Drug Dictionary.
Auszyme® FDA approval label (published Dec. 2001).
Reply of the Patent proprietor to the notice(s) of opposition to EP 1 649 287.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method of evaluating the immunological activity of a vaccine does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method of evaluating the immunological activity of a vaccine, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of evaluating the immunological activity of a vaccine will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2685629

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.