Method of controlling moth and other insect pests

Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Whole live micro-organism – cell – or virus containing – Fungus

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S115000, C424S405000, C504S117000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06544513

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the use of yeast for the control of moth of other insect pests and for attracting and conserving predatory insects of the pests. In particular, the present invention relates to the use of yeast for the control of cotton bollworm and native budworm.
2. Description of the Related Art
Cotton bollworm (
Helicoverpa armigera
Hubner) and native bud worm (
Helicoverpa punctigera
Wallengren) are the major pests of cotton. Both insects are polyphagous and they feed preferentially on young growing tips or reproductive structures. The adults feed on nectar and the damage they cause is the result of the larvae feeding on leaves and buds or bolls. Infestations of these moths results in the loss of the terminal bud or fruiting structures either as floral buds (squares) or as fruit (bolls) causing considerable yield loss. Host plants other than cotton include maize, sorghum, wheat, sunflower, lucerne, various legumes especially soybean, pigeon pea and chickpea, tomatoes, okra, other vegetables, fruits, top fruits and citrus.
H. armigera
is cosmopolitan and is the principal species in the Old World from Africa to the Pacific Islands but
H. punctigera
is an endemic species. Infestation of cotton by Helicoverpa spp. may occur at anytime after seedling emergence, but their abundance is highly variable being influenced by environmental factors, natural enemy abundance, quality and quantity of host plants and also their migratory movements. The two species usually follow a regular pattern of abundance in all areas they attack with
H. punctigera
the dominant species prior to flowering and well into summer (January).
H. armigera
becomes dominant from January onwards in most areas and is rarely seen in early season cotton.
The current control programme for cotton bollworm and native budworm in cotton relies heavily on synthetic insecticides. Cotton crops receive on average 12 insecticide and insecticide mixture sprays each season, although extremes of 18-20 sprays still occur. In 1991 Australian cotton growers spent approximately A$74 million on insecticides, A$15 million on application costs and A$9 million for professional consultants giving total insect control costs approaching A$100 million per year. The over-reliance on insecticides and its associated problems of insecticide resistance especially in
H. armigera
, disruption of natural enemies of the pests and environmental consequences due to residues in soil and water, off-target drift near human habitation have cast doubt on the long term viability of the cotton industry and the classical insecticide approach. It is therefore essential that an alternative non-chemical control measure be developed against the pest to achieve sustainability of cotton production.
Presently with our monoculture practices in agriculture and the use of pesticides we are inadvertently discriminating against beneficial insects. Many areas where crops are grown especially cotton growing areas are remote from wild vegetation. They are often treeless, bushless, reckless and often lay fallow most part of the year. With no natural refuges, no food sources for adult natural enemies of phytophagous insects, beneficial insects are made ineffective. There is therefore lack of diversity and instability in the agroecosystem.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method of controlling an insect pest selected from the group consisting of cotton bollworm, native budworm, plaque thrips, cotton bud thrips, predatory thrips, onion thrips,
Earias huegeli
(Rough bollworm),
Crocidosema plebeiana
(Cotton tipworm),
Pectinophora scutigera
(Pink bollworm),
Anomis flava
(Cotton looper),
Loxostege affinitalis
(Cotton web-spinner),
Agrotis infusa
(Bogong moth),
Spodoptera litura
(Cluster caterpillar),
Chryssodeixis argentifera
(Tobacco looper),
Tetranychus urticae
(Two spotted mites),
Aphis gossypii
(Cotton aphid),
Myzus persicae
(Green peach aphid),
Creontiades dilutus
(Green mirid) and
Campylomma livida
(Apple dimpling bug) on a plant, which comprises attracting, augmenting or conserving natural enemies of the insect pest in order to produce a population of the natural enemies sufficient to control the insect pest by applying to the plant an effective amount of a brewer's yeast,
S. cerevisiae
YESTA
20
B (a dried debittered brewer's yeast).


REFERENCES:
patent: 4598862 (1986-07-01), Rice
patent: 4599362 (1986-07-01), Nakatani et al.
patent: 1185172 (1985-04-01), None
patent: 4005628 (1980-07-01), None
patent: 0462347 (1991-12-01), None
patent: 0563963 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 52082728 (1977-07-01), None
patent: 52099217 (1977-08-01), None
patent: 54132237 (1979-10-01), None
patent: 59128317 (1984-07-01), None
patent: 745944 (1980-07-01), None
patent: 91/19417 (1991-12-01), None
Smith et al., Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 45(2):169-177, Dec. 1988.
Pristavko et al., Entomol. Rev., Oct./Dec. 1974 (transl. 1975) 53(4):28-34.
Gillott, Entomology, 1995, Plenum Press, pp. 691-702, 723-730 & 739.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method of controlling moth and other insect pests does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method of controlling moth and other insect pests, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of controlling moth and other insect pests will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3088894

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.