Surgery: kinesitherapy – Kinesitherapy – Ultrasonic
Reexamination Certificate
1999-12-22
2002-04-09
Smith, Ruth S. (Department: 3737)
Surgery: kinesitherapy
Kinesitherapy
Ultrasonic
C600S427000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06368292
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to methods for medical treatment of pathological conditions. More particularly, the invention relates to methods for using acoustic shock waves to treat a variety of pathological conditions.
2. Description of Related Art
The use of energy wave forms for medical treatment of various bone pathologies is known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,530,360, issued on Jul. 23, 1985 to Duarte, teaches the use of ultrasound transducers, in direct contact with the skin of the patient, for transmitting ultrasound pulses to the site of the bone defect. Duarte teaches a nominal ultrasound frequency of 1.3 to 2.0 MHz, a pulse width range of 10 to 2000 microseconds, and a pulse rate varying between 100 and 1000 Hz Duarte maintains the ultrasound power level below 100 milliwatts per square centimeter, with treatments lasting no more than 20 minutes per day. Other devices utilize piezoelectric materials fastened adjacent to the pathological site on the patient's limb to produce ultrasonic energy in the vicinity of the bone pathology for administering therapy. Examples of such prior art references include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,211,160, 5,259,384, and 5,309,898.
Clinicians have also utilized shock waves to treat various pathologies. Early approaches of using shock waves for medical treatment required immersing the patient in water and directing a shock wave, generated by an underwater spark discharge, at a solid site to be treated, such as a bone or kidney stone. When the shock wave hits the solid site, a liberation of energy from the change of acoustic impedance from water to the solid site produces pressure in the immediate vicinity of the site. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,905,671 to Senge et al., issued on Mar. 6, 1990, teaches a method applying acoustic shock waves to induce bone formation. Senge et al. teaches that the acoustical sound waves utilized by Duarte (and similar references) for treatment of bone have a generally damped sinusoidal wave form centered on ambient pressure. More specifically, Senge et al. teaches that the pressure of an acoustical sound wave utilized by Duarte rises regularly to a maximum value above ambient, falls regularly through ambient and on to a minimum value below ambient in a continued oscillation above and below ambient until complete damping occurs. Portions of the wave above ambient represent acoustic compression, while portions-below ambient represent acoustic tension.
Senge et al. differentiates an idealized shock wave from the acoustic sound wave of Duarte as having a single pressure spike having a very steep onset, a more gradual relaxation, and virtually no oscillation to produce acoustic tension. Furthermore, Senge et al. teaches that the absence of extensive tension wave components allows the shock wave form to pass through soft tissue to cause controlled trauma within a designated bone sight. Senge et al. also teaches the minimization of the amplitude and extent of tension components in the wave forms for the treatment of bone.
Senge et al. utilizes the extremely short rise time of the shock wave to create high compression zones within bone tissue to cause reactions of the microcompartments of the bone. Senge et al. purports that such reactions cause the formation of hematomas within bone, which in turn, induce the formation of new bone. Senge et al. utilizes a shock wave source consisting of a spark gap between electrodes within a container of water. An electrical condenser connected to the electrodes releases its energy over a very short period of time, and an arc arises between the electrodes of the spark gap device which vaporizes water surrounding the spark's path, establishing a plasma-like state. The result is an explosion-like vaporization of the water which produces an electro-hydraulic shock wave that spreads out in a circular fashion. A metallic, ellipsoid-shaped structure surrounds a rear portion of the spark gap, opposite the patient, to produce a known focal point for positioning within the patient's pathological bone site. This device also requires that the patient be submerged in the water.
Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,501 to Valchanov et al., issued on Dec. 25, 1990, teaches a method and apparatus for treating both pathologies with shock or “impact” waves for correction of delayed bone consolidation and bone deformations. The method disclosed in Valchanov et al. comprises the step s of anesthetizing the patient, fixing the limb affected with the pathological bone condition, centering the pathological site of the bone on the shock wave focal point, treating the affected bone site once or consecutively, with 300 to 6000 impacts having a frequency of 0.4-4.0 per second with a pulse duration of 0.5 to 4.0 microseconds for a period of 10-120 minutes, and subsequently immobilizing the limb for a period from 15 to 90 days. The impact wave generating device disclosed by Valchanov et al. generally consists of a vessel which contains a transmitting medium or acoustic liquid such as water contained therein. At a bottom portion of the vessel are opposed electrodes which are adapted to produce a shock across the gap. Therefore, the patient is not submerged for treatment.
Other references teach the treatment of bone pathologies utilizing shock wave therapy in combination with imaging means for localizing the pathology during treatment. Those references include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,284,144, 5,327,890, 5,393,296, 5,409,446, and 5,419,327. Finally, if the number and magnitude of the shock wave pulses are sufficient, the shock wave treatment may disintegrate a kidney stone. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,673 to Rose et al., teaches a method and apparatus utilizing focused shock wave treatment of kidney stones in combination with localization using ultrasound or x-ray imaging.
Still other devices utilize transducers for producing ultrasonic waves for therapy of soft tissue. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,316,000 to Chapelon et al. teaches an array of composite piezoelectric transducers for making an acoustic or ultrasonic therapy device for use in the treatment of varicose veins. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,130 to Kaufman et al. also purports to therapeutically treat soft tissue such as cartilage, ligament, and tendons using a piezoelectric transducer excited by a composite sine-wave signal with a magnitude as may be prescribed by a physician. Thus, past methods for treating soft tissue surrounding bone utilized a transducer for the generation-of ultrasonic waves for wave propagation into the pathological site within the soft tissue area. Furthermore, as described by Senge et al., clinicians traditionally implemented shock wave therapy for the treatment of bone.
A recent study, reported in “Damage Spinal Cord Found to Have Great Potential for Nerve Regrowth,” Case Western Reserve University Press Release, Jul. 15, 1999, describes finding of the capacity for nerve fiber regeneration from transplanted adult nerve cells in adult spinal cords with large lesions. This study implicates molecules in scar tissue at the injury site as the major obstacle to spinal cord regeneration. In the study, sensory nerve cells were transplanted from adult, transgenic mice into the damaged spinal cord of rats, beyond the direct site of the injury. According to current theory, “both normal as well as injured adult white matter tracts in the spinal cord are overtly inhibiting because they contain molecules within the myelin sheaths that signal nerve fibers not to grow.” However, instead of seeing a nerve fiber pathway that was inhibitory for nerve growth, the researchers discovered many axons, so that three months later there was still potential for regeneration away from the site of the injury. At the injury site, the researchers found proteoglycan molecules. These molecules have been correlated with the cessation of axon growth. Further, “‘not only do the regenerating axons stop upon reaching the scar, but they change the shape of their tips and become ‘dystropic’ with malfor
Ogden John A.
Warlick John F.
Healthtronics Inc.
Kilpatrick & Stockton LLP
Smith Ruth S.
LandOfFree
Method for using acoustic shock waves in the treatment of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for using acoustic shock waves in the treatment of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for using acoustic shock waves in the treatment of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2927173