Method for transformation of cotton and organogenic...

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Plant cell or cell line – per se ; composition thereof;... – Culture – maintenance – or preservation techniques – per se

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C435S430000, C435S430100, C435S431000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06479287

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
This invention pertains to the transformation, on the one hand, and organogenic regeneration, on the other hand, of cotton plants, a commercially important crop. Both nuclear and plastid transformation are embraced.
DISCUSSION OF THE BACKGROUND
Cotton has been traditionally recalcitrant to regeneration in vitro. Most regeneration successes have entailed the sole use of Coker lines which respond in. tissue culture but are not agronomically important (Chlan et al., 1995; Firoozabady et al., 1987; Peeters et al., 1994; Shoemaker et al., 1986; Umbeck et al., 1987). Most (if not all) developed regeneration protocols entail the production of embryogenic callus from seedling explants such as cotyledon and hypocotyl sections, followed by the formation of somatic embryos with subsequent germination and conversion into mature cotton plants (Firoozabady and DeBoer, 1993; Firoozabady et al., 1987; Peeters et al., 1994; Rajasekaran et al., 1996; Shoemaker et al., 1986; Umbeck et al., 1987; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,159,135, and 5,244,802). This type of regeneration procedure could take up to 40 weeks and could produce unwanted mutations due to the presence of a prolonged callus phase prior to regeneration.
Cotton tissues have been successfully transformed with A. tumefaciens prior to generation of embryogenic callus used in regeneration (Firoozabady et al., 1987; Rajasekaran et al., 1996; Umbeck et al., 1987). Cotton has also been transformed via biolistics with tissues also undergoing regeneration via somatic embryogenesis (Rajasekaran et al., 1996). A few protocols have recently utilized intact meristem-tips as targets in biolistics-based transformations with regeneration occurring via a more direct organogenic route (Chlan et al., 1995; Finer and McMullen, 1990; McCabe and Marinelli, 1993). Although this has overcome some regeneration obstacles, it is technically demanding. Due to their extremely small size (<1.0 mm), the meristem-tips have to be excised with the aid of a dissecting microscope and once isolated, need to be utilized shortly thereafter.
Accordingly, it remains an object of those of skill in the art to develop a method for regeneration of cotton, in vitro, with an eye to obtaining genetic variation providing desirable qualities. In particular, it is an object of those of skill in the art to obtain a method for transforming plant tissues with exogenous DNA, or obtaining mutations of endogenous DNA, and regenerating the tissues containing these DNA alterations and additions into mature, fertile plants.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5159135 (1992-10-01), Umbeck
patent: 5244802 (1993-09-01), Rangan
patent: 5495070 (1996-02-01), John
patent: 6242257 (2001-06-01), Tuli
Abstract, Srivastava et al, Acta Hort. (289) p. 263-264 1991.*
Dodds et al, Experiments in Plant Tissue Culture, p. 36-38, 1985.*
Bidney, D., C. Scelonge, J. Martich, M. Burrus, L. Sims, and G. Huffman. 1992. Microprojectile bombardment of plant tissue increases transformation frequency byAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol. Biol. 18:301-313.
Chi, G., D. G. Barfield, G. Sim, and E. Pua. 1990. Effect of AgNO3and aminoethoxyvinylglycine on in vitro shoot and root organogenesis from seeding explants of recalcitrant Brassica genotypes. Plant Cell Rpt. 9:195-198.
Chlan, C.A., J. Lin, J.W. Cary, and T.E. Cleveland. 1995. A Procedure for Biolistic Transformation and Regeneration of Transgenic Cotton from Meristematic Tissue. Plant Mol. Biol. Rptr. 13(1):31-37.
Dixon, R. A. 1985. Isolation and maintenance of callus and cell suspension cultures. In Plant Cell Culture: A Practical Approach, R. A. Dixon, ed., IRL Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 1-20.
Finer, J.J., and M.D. McMullen. 1990. Transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rpt. 8:586-589.
Firoozabady, E., D.L. DeBoer, D.J. Merlo, E.L. Halk, L.N. Amerson, K.E. Rashka, and E.E. Murray. 1987. Transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) byAgroacterium tumefaciensand regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 10:105-116.
Firoozabady, E., and D. L. DeBoer. 1993. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in many cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 29P:166-173.
Hyde, C. L., and G. C. Phillips. 1996. Silver nitrate promotes shoot development and plant regeneration of chile pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) via organogenesis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 32P:72-80.
Ishida, Y., H. Saito, S. Ohta, Y. Hiei, T. Komari, and T. Kumashiro. 1996. High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens.Nature Biotechnology vol. 14:745-750.
Jefferson, R. A. 1987. Assaying Chimeric Genes in Plants: The GUS Gene Fusion System. Plant Mol. Biol. Rptr. vol. 5:387-405.
McCabe, D.E., and B.J. Martinell. 1993. Transformation of Elite Cotton Cultivars via Particle Bombardment of Meristems. Bio/Technology vol. 11:596-598.
Murashige, T., and F. Skoog. 1962. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assay with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant. vol. 15:473-497.
Nitsch, J.P., and C. Nitsch. 1969. Haploid Plants from Pollen Grains. Science vol. 163:85-87.
Peeters, M. C., K. Willems, and R. Swennen. 1994, Protoplast-to-plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.cv. Coker 312) using feeder layers. Plant Cell Rpt. 13:208-211.
Phillips, R. L., S. M. Kaeppler, and P. Olhoft. 1994, Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: Breakdown of normal controls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. vol. 91:5222-5226.
Pua, E., G. Sim, G. Chi, and L. Kong, 1996. Synergistic effect of ethylene inhibitors and putrescine on shoot regeneration from hypocotyl explants of Chinese radish (Raphanus sativus L.var.Longipinnatus Bailey) in vitro. Plant Cell. Rpt. 15:685-690.
Purnhauser, L., P. Medgyesy, M. Czako, P.J. Dix, and L. Marton. 1987. Stimulation of shoot regenration inTriticum aestivumandNicotiana plumbaginifoliaViv. tissue cultures using the ethylene inhibitor AgNO3. Plant Cell Rpt. 6:1-4.
Rajasekaran, K., J.W. Grula, R.L. Hudspeth, S. Pofelis, and D.M. Anderson. 1996. Herbicide-resistant Acala and Coker cottons transformed with a native gene encoding mutant forms of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Mol. breed. 2:307-319.
Shoemaker, R.C., L.J. Couche, and D.W. Galbraith. 1986. Characterization of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Rpt. 3:178-181.
Svab, Z., and P. Maliga. 1993. High-frequency plastid transformation in tobacco by selection for a chimericaadAgene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 90:913-917.
Umbeck, P., G. Johnson, K. Barton, and W. Swain. 1987. Genetically transformed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Bio/technology vol. 5:263-266.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for transformation of cotton and organogenic... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for transformation of cotton and organogenic..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for transformation of cotton and organogenic... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2978226

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.