Metal deforming – By shot-blasting
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-17
2001-09-18
Jones, David (Department: 3725)
Metal deforming
By shot-blasting
C029S090700
Reexamination Certificate
active
06289705
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method of so-called “ultrasonic” peening using a mist of microbeads inside a chamber and more particularly to a method for peening large sized annular surfaces on thin parts.
2. Summary of the Prior Art
It is known practice for the surfaces of metal parts to be peened by blasting with microbeads. By impacting the surface of the metal part with a small angle of incidence with respect of the perpendicular to this surface and with sufficient kinetic energy, the microbeads cause permanent compression of the surface to a small depth. This compression inhibits the initiation and propagation of cracks at the surface of the metals part and thus improves the fatigue strength of that metal part.
The microbeads are commonly ball bearings. They are usually made of ceramic or steel with a diameter in the range 0.2 mm to 4 mm. Peening is performed inside a closed booth using nozzles supplied both with compressed gas and with microbeads, the compressed gas propelling the microbeads towards the metal part.
In the aeronautical industry, thin metal parts of large dimension are manufactured. A number of difficulties are encountered in peening these thin metal parts. For example, large metal parts require large closed booths for peening operations.
Peening is often light in order not to deform the thin metal parts. This is because thin metal parts are unable, without deforming, to absorb the loadings caused by the compressive stresses resulting from the microbeads of heavy peening.
There is an optimum exposure of the metal part to peening for imparting the best strength. However, such optimum exposure to peening is difficult to achieve because peening nozzles are difficult to adjust and are not stable. Insufficient peening does not give the anticipated strength, but additional peening to achieve the optimum exposive may lead to excessive peening which causes irreparable surface damage to the metal part, with a resultant reduction in the strength of that metal part.
French Patent 2 689 431 discloses a modified method of ultrasonic peening which involves sustaining a “mist” or microbeads inside a chamber. The mist of microbeads is sustained by a vibrator operating at frequencies in the order of 20 kHz. The chamber is open and the metal is pressed against the opening of the chamber. Peening is by microbead impact on the metal part. The chamber and the metal parts are given a relative movement aimed at causing the chamber to pass over the entire surface of the metal part to be peened. The patent also discloses how to peen circular parts such as shafts.
The term “mist” is used by analogy with the mists formed by minuscule water droplets. In ultrasonic peening, the microbeads have speeds which are random both in magnitude and in direction, which causes the microbeads to ricochet off each other, off the walls of the chamber and off the surface of the part in contact with the mist of microbeads.
FR2689431 provides examples of massive parts capable of absorbing, without deformation, the loadings resulting from peening in accordance with its method. However, the method of FR 2689431 does not allow the peening of thin circular metal parts, as these circular metal parts begin to deform very early in the peening operation. Even if the surface of the thin circular part is peened uniformly, these deformations are only partially absorbed at the end of the peening operation as they are plastic and non-linear deformations of the material. In addition, the method of FR 2689431 demands, if uniform peening is to be obtained, that peening be halted precisely when the circular metal part has made one revolution. Otherwise, over rotation would produce a localized excess of peening on a zone of overlap, whereas under rotation would give rise to a gap of localized lack of peening which would be difficult to correct without giving rise to excessive peening in a region immediately adjacent the original gap of lack of peening.
A first problem, therefore, is that of peening thin and circular parts whose dimensions exceed those of the peening chamber, without deforming the parts. A second problem is that of guaranteeing uniform peening across the entire surface that is to be peened.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method for ultrasonic peening a large sized annular surface of a thin part, said method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a chamber with an opening and a vibrator within said chamber;
b) providing a plurality of microbeads in said chamber;
c) causing relative rotational movement of said thin part and said chamber whereby said annular surface to be peened moves relatively past said opening;
d) operating said vibrator to sustain said plurality of said microbeads as a mist of microbeads in said chamber such that microbeads impact on the annular surface to be peened as the surface moves relatively past said opening; and
e) containing said relative rotational movement such that said annular surface makes at least five rotations past the said opening.
In other words, peening is performed in N passes past the opening of the chamber, each point of the surface that is to be peened passing N times past the opening of the chamber, each passage performing a fraction roughly equal to 1/N of the total peening that is to be performed.
A method such as this has the effect of improving the uniformity of the peening over the entire surface that is to be peened. It has been noted that this uniformity reduces the deformations of the part during peening and the residual deformation of the part when peening is finished. The loadings imposed on the part during peening remain roughly uniform across the entire peened surface. The first problem is thus solved.
In addition, it is no longer necessary to halt the peening precisely when the part has made N passes past the peening chamber. The excess or lack of peening as the result of this imprecision will at most be equal to 1/N of the total peening. This solves the second problem.
N must be at least 5 in order to achieve acceptable results. However, better results are achieved with a greater number of revolutions or passes, for example if N is 20 or 100. A high number N of revolutions or passes is dictated when peening very thin parts.
A particular advantage of the present method is that it allows significant and thorough peening. Thus, more optimal peening on thin parts may be achieved without deformation. It will be understood that, during peening in accordance with present invention, the loadings imposed on the part remain uniform.
The method that is the subject of this patent application must not be confused with the method disclosed in the aforementioned FR2689431. Although FR2689431 does not state explicitly that peening is performed in a single pass, FR 2689431 does infer that such a single pass is required. Specifically, in FR2689431 at Page 7 line 20 gives the formula Vi=Ai/To, Vi being the rate of travel of the chamber over the part, Ai being the width of the vibrating surface which is practically coincident with the width of the chamber in the light of
FIG. 1
, and To being the time that the surface is exposed to peening, this time being given by a formula at Page 7 line 7. If peening were performed in N passes, FR 2689431 would have had to state Vi=N×Ai/To so that each part of the surface that is to be peened was properly exposed for the duration To. Now, the only way of interpreting FR 2689431 is that N=1.
Furthermore, it is stated particularly at page 7 lines 24-34 that a higher speed leads to insufficient peening whereas a lower speed leads to “excessive work hardening”. The speed parameter Vi is important here because the entire periphery of the part has to be peened exactly in one single revolution or in a very small number or revolutions in order to observe the time To for which each surface part is to be exposed to peening. With the present invention on the other hand, this speed parameter is of no importance, provided of course that it r
Duquenne Catherine Dominique Béatrice
Giffard Véronique Christiane Raymonde
Gueldry Gerard Michel Roland
Mons Claude Marcel
Jones David
Oblon & Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt P.C.
Snecma Moteurs
LandOfFree
Method for the ultrasonic peening of large sized annular... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for the ultrasonic peening of large sized annular..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for the ultrasonic peening of large sized annular... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2464408