Liquid purification or separation – Processes – Making an insoluble substance or accreting suspended...
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-16
2001-04-03
Hruskoci, Peter A. (Department: 1724)
Liquid purification or separation
Processes
Making an insoluble substance or accreting suspended...
C210S713000, C210S714000, C210S727000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06210587
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process for the physico-chemical treatment of effluent, especially of surface water intended for consumption.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is known that the use of physico-chemical processes is common to most treatments applied to various types of water and that these treatments essentially consist of:
clarification of surface water for consumption or for industry;
clarification of municipal sewage, storm water or industrial waste water;
decarbonization;
removal of phosphates;
etc.
These types of physico-chemical treatments always comprise the following successive steps:
coagulation: a step of neutralization of the colloids using a metal salt, generally a trivalent iron or aluminium compound, in order to form a microfloc.
This coagulation step may be carried out in one or more steps;
flocculation: a step of agglomeration and growth of the microfloc. This agglomeration step takes place by virtue of the addition of a polyelectrolyte (or polymer) downstream of the coagulation step;
settling: a step of separation of the floc from the interstitial water, causing the formation of sludge on the one hand, and of clarified water on the other hand.
Over the last thirty years or so, the state of the art relating to such a physico-chemical treatment has evolved considerably as a result of the appearance of two technologies:
flocculation with a contacting mass, which has allowed the quality of the flocs to be improved, the volume of the reactors to be reduced and the clarification to be improved. This is because the microflocs of the coagulation have a greater chance of agglomerating and of growing as the reaction medium contains a high density of particles: the rate of floc formation is proportional to the number of free particles in the suspension;
lamellar settling, carried out by introducing inclined plates or tubes in the settling tanks. This technology has made it possible to reduce the size of the settling tanks by from 50 to 70%
The current technological trend is towards improving the flocculation conditions, which are key in determining the quality of the treated water and in obtaining high settling velocities.
At the present time, modern settling tanks use two types of contacting masses in the flocculation reactor:
1. recirculated presettled sludge: an example of this technique is described in FR-A-2,553,082;
2. fine ballasts, such as microsand: an example of the use of this technique is described in FR-P-1,411,792 and in FR-A-2,627,704.
The advantages and disadvantages of the two known techniques indicated above, of flocculation with a contacting mass, will now be explained.
1. Flocculation Using Sludge as the Contacting Mass
FIG. 1
of the appended drawing shows diagrammatically a physico-chemical treatment plant employing this technique. This figure shows diagrammatically, at A, the coagulation reactor, at B, the flocculator and, at C, the settling tank. These are plants well known to those skilled in the art and, under these conditions, they will not be described.
Thus, as may be seen in this
FIG. 1
, the contacting mass in the flocculation reactor B consists of the recirculation of part of the sludge which has settled in C. The recirculated sludge volume represents between 0.5 and 4% of the treated volume. The excess, concentrated sludge is extracted and removed. Their volume represents between 0.1 and 1% of the treated volume, depending on the treatments.
The advantages of this flocculation technique using recirculated presettled sludge as the contacting mass are the following:
the contacting mass is generated by the process, and is therefore available without any quantity limitation, depending on the requirements of the process;
the contacting mass presents a very high specific surface area or spatial occupation because of its expanded structure and its low relative density; by way of example, 1 gram of flocculated sludge in one liter (average concentration in the reactor) occupies, after settling for approximately 5 minutes, a volume equal to 100 ml.
This very high specific surface area or spatial occupation considerably increases the probability of contact between the flocs and the very fine particles, coagulated colloids and micro-organisms, and therefore of “trapping” this suspended matter very efficiently.
The drawbacks and limitations of this technique involve the settling speeds obtained with densified sludges which are between 30% and 80% of the velocities obtained with ballast.
2. Flocculation Using a Ballast as the Contacting Mass
According to this technique, the contacting mass is obtained by adding, upstream of a flocculator, a fresh or recycled ballast after cleaning. The means making it possible to separate and regenerate the ballast which is to be recycled in the flocculator are means well known to those skilled in the art and, under these conditions, they will not be described.
When implementing this technique, the ballast generally consists of sand and the continuously extracted materials amount to approximately 5% of the volume of water treated by the settling tank; these extracted materials, laden with sludge coating the microsand, must be treated so as to regenerate the sand; the cleaned sand is subsequently reinjected upstream of the flocculator, at the front of the plant. The residue generated by this sand-ballast cleaning operation represents the excess sludge.
It will be noted that the existing ballast-type apparatus described in the literature, and especially in FR-P-1,411,792 and in FR-A-2,627,704, include a ballast-recycling step for obvious running-cost reasons. Moreover, in all the documents describing this technology it is specified that the ballast is always “cleaned”, i.e. regenerated. This is because, the ballast, “coated” with the polymer, must have the maximum area of adhesion for the precipitation flocs produced chemically during coagulation. An effective physical cleaning is therefore indispensable for maximizing the binding area available.
The ballast is often sand, generally having a diameter of between 50 &mgr;m and 150 &mgr;m, usually called microsand.
The publication Journal Water SRT-AQUA, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 18-27, 1992 describes a curve relating the turbidity of the water produced to the diameter of the ballast particles, which demonstrates that this process becomes effective when the sand particles do not exceed 150 &mgr;m, the results being even better with values of the order of 50 to 100 &mgr;m.
It should be pointed out that the advantage of this technique of flocculation using a contacting mass consisting of a fine ballast essentially resides in the settling velocity, which may be from 20% to 200% greater than the velocities obtained by the flocculation processes using a contacting mass consisting of recirculated presettled sludge. Thus, when clarifying river water, the indicated velocities through the lamellar modules are between 25 and 50 m
3
/m
2
.h, while the equipment implementing the flocculation process using sludge as the contacting mass is limited to velocities of between approximately 15 and 30 m
3/
m
2
.h.
The essential drawbacks of this technique mainly stem from the fact that the ballast must provide two different functions:
accelerated flocculation, by virtue of the use of a contacting mass having a high specific surface area (or spatial occupation);
increase in the settling velocities, resulting from the addition of ballast to the floc.
These limitations or drawbacks can be imputed to the following characteristics:
for equivalent contacting mass (by weight), the ballast offers a contacting surface area or percentage of spatial occupation which is much less than the sludge. By way of example:
in the case of “flocculation with sludge”, the concentration in the reactor is approximately 1 g/l and the volume occupied by the sludge after five minutes of settling is approximately 10% of the initial volume;
in the case of “flocculation with ballast (for example sand)”, the ballast concentration in the reactor should reach at least 5 g/l, while the volume o
Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz
Degremont
Hruskoci Peter A.
LandOfFree
Method for the physico-chemical treatment of effluents, in... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for the physico-chemical treatment of effluents, in..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for the physico-chemical treatment of effluents, in... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2530684