X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices – Specific application – Absorption
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-25
2003-12-30
Glick, Edward J. (Department: 2882)
X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices
Specific application
Absorption
C378S057000, C378S059000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06671346
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to the field of quality assurance. It relates to a method for the nondestructive quality testing of a thermocouple in accordance with the preamble of claim
1
.
PRIOR ART
The hot junction, i.e. the location at which the two different wires of the thermocouple are connected or welded to one another, is the most important area of a thermocouple. Its quality has a direct influence on the expected service life in use under extreme environmental conditions, such as those which prevail, for example, when the thermocouple is used in a gas turbine. Tests carried out on previous failures have shown that fatigue fractures in the wires, induced by vibration and alternating loads, are one of the major reasons for failure of the thermocouples.
The reasons for this can be explained with reference to
FIGS. 1
to
8
: in a thermocouple
10
which is shown in cross section in
FIG. 1
, two wires
13
,
14
comprising metals or metal alloys which are adapted with regard to the thermoelectric effect, run substantially parallel to one another and at their ends are connected to one another by a welded joint
15
so as to form a hot junction, are arranged inside a closed sheath
11
. The interior
12
of the sheath
11
is filled with insulation, which consists, for example, of compressed MgO powder.
Thermocouples of this type can currently be produced in various ways, which are of considerable significance with regard to the subsequent service life. In the case of the production route illustrated in
FIGS. 2
to
6
, which in each case show the thermocouple
10
in longitudinal section, the starting point is a pair of parallel wires
13
,
14
which are as yet unconnected and, inside the sheath
11
, are initially completely embedded in insulation comprising highly compressed (MgO) powder. Then, the insulation
16
is removed from the wires
13
,
14
—for example by sand-blasting—over a relatively great length, for example over several millimeters (FIG.
2
). The free ends of the wires
13
,
14
are then bent toward one another, so as to deviate from the parallel orientation (FIG.
3
), and are then welded to one another by a welded joint
15
(FIG.
4
). The free interior space
12
is then filled again with insulation
17
comprising (MgO) powder (
FIG. 5
) and is finally closed off by a (welded) closure
18
(FIG.
6
). For manufacturing technology reasons, the insulation
17
is less highly compressed than the insulation
16
, as indicated by different hatching in
FIGS. 5 and 6
.
Two problems arise with this method of production and may lead to failure of the thermocouples and therefore reduce quality: firstly, when the wires are being exposed by means of sandblasting, the wires are exposed to a vibrational load which may cause some level of damage to the wires. Secondly, the mechanical support for the wires
13
,
14
provided by the insulation
17
which is added at a later stage and is less highly compressed is considerably lower, and consequently during operation the wires, which may already have been preliminarily damaged, are made to vibrate and may therefore fail as a result of vibration fatigue.
In the different production route shown in
FIGS. 7 and 8
, only the immediate ends of the wires
13
,
14
of the thermocouple
10
′ are exposed and welded to one another (welded joint
15
). The filling and closing steps then take place in a similar manner to those illustrated in
FIGS. 5 and 6
. With this type of production, the wires
13
,
14
are subject to considerably lower mechanical loads both during production and during subsequent operation.
To keep the risk of the thermocouple failing during subsequent operation as low as possible, thermocouples which have been produced as shown in
FIGS. 2
to
6
are wherever possible detected at the incoming inspection and are separated out as being unsuitable for certain applications. It is therefore desirable to have a method which allows nondestructive testing to determine which of the two methods described above has been used to produce the thermocouples.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Therefore, it is an object of the invention to provide a method which allows simple nondestructive testing of thermocouples to determine whether they are suitable for use under extreme environmental conditions.
The core principle of the invention consists in X-radiation being passed through the thermocouple perpendicular to the plane of the wires and in taking an X-ray image, then determining the position of the wires in the vicinity of the welded joint from the X-ray image, and finally establishing the quality of the thermocouple from the position of the wires in the vicinity of the welded joint. The position of the wires provides an indirect indication as to the extent to which the wires have been exposed during production of the welded joint and where the boundary between the highly compacted insulation powder and the less compacted insulation powder which was added at a later stage is located.
In particular, the quality of the thermocouple is deemed acceptable if the wires run completely parallel as far as the welded joint, while the quality of the thermocouple is deemed unacceptable if the wires are angled off or bent toward one another, deviating from the parallel arrangement, a few millimeters before the welded joint.
If the wires are at a predetermined first distance from one another in the parallel arrangement, the quality of the thermocouple is preferably deemed unacceptable if the distance between the wires in the angled-off region is reduced by more than a third of the first distance.
It is particularly advantageous if, according to one configuration of the invention, the X-ray image is additionally used to determine the thickness of the sheath and/or the distance between the welded joint and the sheath and/or the thickness of the welded joint and/or the thickness of the wires, and these parameters are used for quality determination. This additionally, without further outlay, makes it possible to draw conclusions as to the stability of the sheath, the quality of the welded joint and the position of the welded joint relative to the sheath (centering etc.).
These inspections are particularly comprehensive if, according to a preferred refinement, in addition to the X-ray image perpendicular to the plane of the wires, an X-ray image is taken in a direction which is rotated through 90° and this image is used for quality determination.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4164433 (1979-08-01), Granahan et al.
patent: 5012502 (1991-04-01), Battin et al.
patent: 6137860 (2000-10-01), Ellegood et al.
patent: 6377654 (2002-04-01), Willems et al.
M.J. Roberts et al, “Derivation and Testing of a Model to Calculate Electrical Shunting and Leakage Errors in Sheathed Thermocouples”, Review of Scientific Instruments., Bd. 48, Nr. 9, Sep. 1977, pp. 1179-1191, XP002176249 American Institute of Physics. New York., U.S., ISSN:0034-6748.
Baumann Robert
Class Michael
Alstom (Switzerland) Ltd.
Cermak Adam J.
Glick Edward J.
Ho Allen C.
LandOfFree
Method for the nondestructive quality testing of a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for the nondestructive quality testing of a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for the nondestructive quality testing of a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3108088