Semiconductor device manufacturing: process – With measuring or testing
Reexamination Certificate
1999-02-08
2002-08-06
Nelms, David (Department: 2818)
Semiconductor device manufacturing: process
With measuring or testing
C438S016000, C438S017000, C438S018000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06429030
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates in general to semiconductor die, and more particularly to testing of semiconductor die using wells.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Semiconductor manufacturers have the cost saving goal of detecting and screening out defective integrated circuits as early as possible in the manufacturing process. In addition, the requirement of supplying “known good die” to multi-chip module (MCM) manufacturers has increased the importance of this goal.
During a typical semiconductor manufacturing process, a plurality of integrated circuits are formed as individual die on a semiconductor wafer. At present, each semiconductor wafer generally has dozens to hundreds of individual die formed thereon. As integration geometries decrease and the size of semiconductor wafers increase, the number of integrated circuit die formed on each wafer will most likely increase.
While the die are still in wafer form, each die is probed in order to determine whether each die passes a very basic opens/shorts test (e.g. a test for electrical opens or electrical shorts). In some cases, a full functional test is also performed using the probe equipment. However, no reliability testing is performed because it would be too costly to tie up the probe equipment testing one or a few die at a time for the hours required for reliability testing.
The purpose of the wafer level probe test is to determine, as early as possible in the manufacturing process, whether each individual die is defective or not. The earlier a defective die is detected, the less money that is wasted on further processing of defective die.
The die are then separated or singulated into individual die using any one of a variety of singulation techniques. In most cases, each die is then packaged in an integrated circuit package. Once the die have been packaged, thorough electrical testing is performed on each of the packaged integrated circuits. The purpose of the thorough electrical testing is to determine whether each packaged integrated circuit properly performs the functionality specified by the semiconductor manufacturer. The tested, packaged integrated circuits are then sold.
In some cases, the packaged integrated circuits also undergo a reliability testing procedure called burn-in. Burn-in testing involves the testing of an integrated circuit for an extended period of time while the temperature of the integrated circuit is elevated above room temperature. In some cases, the heat generated by the integrated circuit itself is sufficient to elevate the temperature of the integrated circuit. In other cases, the temperature of the integrated circuit is raised by an apparatus external to the integrated circuit (e.g. a burn-in oven in which the packaged integrated circuits are placed).
Alternately, instead of or in addition to burn-in testing, cold temperature reliability testing may be performed. Cold temperature reliability testing involves the testing of an integrated circuit for an extended period of time while the temperature of the integrated circuit is decreased below room temperature.
Semiconductor manufacturers spend a significant amount of money packaging defective die which pass the testing performed during probing, but which do not pass the reliability testing after packaging. In addition, the probe testing is redundant in that the same electrical tests are again performed on the individual integrated circuits after packaging.
The cost saving goal of detecting and screening out defective die as early as possible in the manufacturing process is especially important in the context of multi-chip modules (MCMs). Multi-chip modules (MCMs) are electronic modules that include a plurality of integrated circuit die which are packaged together as one unit. Multi-chip modules are becoming more widely used.
For multi-chip modules, it is quite costly to replace one or more failed die once the die have been bonded onto a substrate. Therefore, it is desirable to determine whether or not a die is fully functional and is reliable before the die is packaged as part of a multi-chip module. In addition, many manufacturers of multi-chip modules are requiring that semiconductor manufacturers sell them fully tested “known good die” which have passed reliability tests and which are not packaged in an integrated circuit package.
As summarized above, testing of “known good die” has become particularly important in modem semiconductor manufacturing. In this regard, various testing procedures have been devised with respect to semiconductor die that have bond pads to which are connected wire bonds, known in the art as a wirebond die. One example of a portion of an apparatus to test and burn-in such wirebond die is shown in FIG.
1
.
FIG. 1
illustrates a prior art structure including carrier
10
which is connected to socket
12
, which in turn is connected to testing equipment (not shown) for testing and burn-in of die
50
. As shown, carrier
10
includes a forced delivery mechanism
14
which is connected to lid
16
through a biasing member (e.g. a spring). The force delivery mechanism is placed to overlie die
50
and bias die
50
in a downward direction such that the wirebond pads around the outer periphery of the die are biased against carrier contacts
18
. As shown, the carrier contacts
18
have a “mushroom” shape, and are connected to interconnects
20
which extend over compliant material. The interconnects
20
are in turn connected to electrical contacts (not shown) extending through the socket
12
.
While the apparatus shown in
FIG. 1
including carrier
10
and socket
12
may be used to test and burn-in wirebond-type die, it is not particularly adapted for testing and burn-in of “bumped” semiconductor die, such as die having bumps formed on an active surface thereof by the known Control Collapsed Chip Connection technology (“C
4
”). As is known in the art, such bumped die have a relatively large array of solder bumps provided on the active surface of the semiconductor die. The bumped die is configured to be inverted and placed on a plastic or ceramic substrate, and the solder bumps are reflowed to effect mechanical and electrical connection between the bumped die and the substrate. However, the bumps formed on the die are at a relatively fine pitch, and are formed in a relatively large number. For example, a common C
4
bump is on the order of 125 microns in diameter and adjacent bumps are spaced apart from each other by 125 micron spaces.
Accordingly, the array is formed at a relatively fine pitch, typically on the order of 250 microns. In current applications, a typical microprocessor semiconductor die can have on the order of one thousand or greater C
4
bumps.
Because of the relatively large number, high density and fine feature size associated with bumped die, numerous difficulties exist with testing and burn-in. More particularly, in an attempt to test or burn-in a bumped die, the present inventors attempted to modify the known carrier
10
depicted in
FIG. 1
for use with a C
4
bumped die, which brought to light several problems. First, as shown in
FIG. 1
, the carrier contact
18
has somewhat of a “mushroom” shape, wherein the upper contact surface of the carrier contact
18
is roughened to have a texture which contacts the C
4
bumps. This texture is effective to break a native oxide on wirebond pads, to make ohmic contact to the wirebond pads. However, this same texture has the effect of roughening and pitting the C
4
bumps on the die. As a result of the pitting, it was found that the vision equipment utilized for alignment during the first level packaging operation (i.e., bonding of the bumped die to the substrate) could not properly image and align the bumped die with the substrate. In addition, it was believed that roughening of the contact surfaces of the bumps may cause problems subsequent to reflow, including void formation and perhaps reliability problems.
Further, it was found that according to the bumped die in which the bumps are laid out in an array fashion at a relatively small
Burmeister Gernot U.
Fetty Allan M.
Berry Renee R.
Motorola Inc.
Nelms David
Rodriguez Robert A.
LandOfFree
Method for testing a semiconductor die using wells does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for testing a semiconductor die using wells, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for testing a semiconductor die using wells will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2920156