Method for stimulating wound healing

Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Antigen – epitope – or other immunospecific immunoeffector – Amino acid sequence disclosed in whole or in part; or...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S198100, C514S009400, C530S350000, C530S399000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07981426

ABSTRACT:
The present invention relates to a method for stimulating wound healing, and more particularly to a method for stimulating wound healing in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering to a wound of the subject an effective amount for stimulating wound healing of a composition, wherein the composition comprises p43 having an amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 or functional equivalents thereof. The composition used in the method of the present invention can be efficiently utilized for the wound healing, since p43, an effective ingredient of the composition, has an excellent effect on the wound healing by its action including the induction of macrophage/monocyte and endothelial cell re-epithelization, proliferation of fibroblasts or angiogenesis.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6875749 (2005-04-01), Schwarz et al.
patent: 6916648 (2005-07-01), Goddard et al.
patent: 7282208 (2007-10-01), Kim
patent: 7572452 (2009-08-01), Kim
patent: 2002/0160957 (2002-10-01), Stern et al.
patent: WO 01/95927 (2001-12-01), None
Skolnick et al. From genes to protein structure and function: novel applications of computational approaches in the genomic era. Trends in Biotech 18(1): 34-39, 2000.
Bork, A. Powers and pitfalls in sequence analysis: the 70% hurdle. Genome Res 10: 398-400, 2000.
Doerks et al. Protein annotation: detective work for function prediction. Trends in Genetics 14(6): 248-250, 1998.
Smith et al. The challenges of genome sequence annotation or “The devil is in the details”. Nature Biotech 15: 1222-1223, 1997.
Brenner, S.E. Errors in genome function. Trends in Genetics 15(4): 132-133, 1999.
Bork et al. Go hunting in sequence databases but watch out for the traps. Trends in Genetics. 12(10): 425-427, 1996.
Wells. J.A. Additivity of mutational effects in proteins. Biochemistry 29 (37): 8509-8517, 1990.
Ngo et al. Computational complexity, protein structure prediction, and the Levinthal paradox. The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction, pp. 492-495, 1994.
Park et al. Monocyte cell adhesion induced by a human aminoacyl-tRNA synthetae-associated factor, p43: identification of the related adhesion molecules and signaling pathways. J Leuk Biol 71: 223-230, 2002.
Park et al. The novel cytokine p43 stimulates dermal fibroblast proliferation and wound repair. Am J Pathol 166(2): 387-398, 2005.
Kao et al. Characerization of a novel tumor-derived cytokine. J Biol Chem 269(40): 25106-25119, 1994.
Ko et al. A cofactor of tRNA synthetase, p43, is secreted to up-regulate proinflammatory genes. J Biol Chem 276(25): 23028-23033, 2001.
Ben-Izhak et al., “Ki67 antigen and PCNA proliferation markers predict survival in anorectal malignant melanoma,”Histopathology 41:519-525, 2002.
Bennett et al., “Growth Factors and Wound Healing: Biochemical Properties of Growth Factors and Their Receptors,”Am. J. Surgery 165:728-737, Jun. 1993.
Berger et al., “Endothelial Monocyte-Activating Polypeptide II, a Tumor-Derived Cytokine That Plays an Important Role in Inflammation, Apoptosis, and Angiogenesis,”J. Immunotherapy 23(5):519-527, 2000.
Cecconi et al., “Gene-trap: a way to identify novel genes and unravel their biological function,”FEBS Letters 480:63-71, 2000.
Chang et al., “Interaction of the C-terminal Domain of p43 and the α Subunit of ATP Synthase,”J. Biol. Chem. 277(10):8388-8394, Mar. 8, 2002.
Gallucci et al., “Impaired cutaneous wound healing in interleukin-6-deficient and immunosuppressed mice,”The FASEB J. 14:2525-2531, Dec. 2000.
Knighton et al., “Regulation of Cutaneous Wound Healing by Growth Factors and the Microenvironment,”Invest. Radiol. 26:604-611, Jun. 1991.
Ko et al., “Biphasic regulation of angiogenesis by a cofactor of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, p43,”Molecular Biol. Of the Cell 12:127a, Nov. 2001.
Lund et al., “Functional overlap between two classes of matrix-degrading proteases in wound healing,”The EMBO Journal 18(17):4645-4656, 1999.
Park et al., “Dose-dependent Biphasic Activity of tRNA Synthetase-associating Factor, p43, in Angiogenesis,”J. Biol. Chem. 277(47):45243-25248, Nov. 22, 2002.
Park et al., “Precursor of Pro-apoptotic Cytokine Modulates Aminoacylation Activity of tRNA Synthetase,”J. Biol. Chem. 274(24):16673-16676, Jun. 11, 1999.
Southern, “Detection of Specific Sequences Among DNA Fragments Separated by Gel Electrophoresis,”J. Mol. Biol. 98:503-517, 1975.
Steed, “Modifying the Wound Healing Response With Exogenous Growth Factors,”Clinics in Plastic Surgery 25(3):397-405, Jul. 1998.
Werner et al., “The Function of KGF in Morphogenesis of Epithelium and Reepithelialization of Wounds,”Science 266:819-822, Nov. 4, 1994.
Zambrowicz et al., “Disruption and sequence identification of 2,000 genes in mouse embryonic stem cells,”Nature 392:608-611, Apr. 9, 1998.
Ziak et al., “Two Isoforms of Trimming Glucoside II Exist in Exist in Mammalian Tissues and Cell Lines but Not in Yeast and Insect Cells,”Biochem. And Biophys. Res. Comm. 280(1):363-367, 2001.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for stimulating wound healing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for stimulating wound healing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for stimulating wound healing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2724554

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.