Method for selecting conifer trees

Plant husbandry – Process

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C800S319000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08061079

ABSTRACT:
A method for selecting conifer trees is disclosed. This method relates to the early measurement of tree characteristics for selecting trees most likely to exhibit certain traits as they mature. This method can be used for implementing silvicultural treatments, thinning or further breeding.

REFERENCES:
Barnes et al. Genetic control of fifth year traits inPinus patulaSchiede and Deppe. Silvae Genetica 41, 4-5, 1992, pp. 242-248.
Carter et al. Symptoms and Causes of Distorted Growth in Immature Forest Stands in Coastal British Columbia. Land Management Report No. 39, 1986, pp. 23-36.
Cline et al. Hormonal control of second flushing in Douglas-fir shoots. Tree Physiology 26, 1369-1375, 2006.
Cline. Execution of the auxin replacement apical dominance experiment in termperate woody species. American Journal of Botany 87(2): 182-1900, 2000.
Harmer. Differences in growth and branch production by young plants of two provenances ofQuercus roburL. Forestyr, vol. 73, No. 3, 2000, pp. 271-281.
McKeand et al. Growth and stem sinuosity of diverse provenances of three-year-old Loblolly pine. In: Proc. 22nd Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 1993, 208-213.
Notes on Elm in the Korqin Sandy Lands, 2002. Northeast China. Retrieved from the Internet on Apr. 27, 2007 at <http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/006/AD110E/AD110E02.htm> 15 pages.
Powell. Shoot elongation, leaf demography and bud formation in relation to branch position onLarix Iaricinasaplings. Trees, 1998, 2: 150-164.
Schermann et al. Genetic parameters of stem form traits in a 9-year-old coastal Douglas-fir progeny test in Washington. Silvae Genetica, 1997, 46, 2-3, pp. 166-170.
Will. Nitrogen supply, apical dominance and branch growth inPinus radiata. Plant and Soil 34, 515-517 (1971).
Adams et al. Genetics of Second Flushing in a French Plantation of Coastal Douglas-Fir, Silvae Genetica 43, 5/6 (1994), pp. 345-352.
Bail et al. Stem deformity inPinus radiataon highly fertile sites:expression and genetic variation. Aust. For. 1989, 52 (4), pp. 309-320.
Partanen et al. Effect of Accumulated Duration of the Light Period on Bud Burst in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) of Varying ages. Silva Fennica 35(1) 2001, pp. 111-117.
Kaya et al. The pattern of genetic variation in shoot growth ofPinus bruitaTen. populations sampled from the Toros Mountains in Turkey. Silvae Genetica, 46, 2-3, 1997, pp. 73-81.
King et al. Selection of growth and yield traits in controlled crosses of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genetica 37, 3-4 (1988), pp. 158-164.
Rudolph. Lammas growth and prolepsis in Jack pine in the Lake States. Forest Science Monograph Jun. 1964, pp. 1-70.
Hunt. Ninth-Year Performance of Slash and Loblolly Pine Nursery Selections in Georgia. Forestry Research Technician, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1967, pp. 92-94.
Cornelius. The effectiveness of plus-treee selection for yield. Fores Ecology and Management 67 (1994) 23-34.
Howe et al. Genetics of Stem Quality in Coastal Douglas-fir. Genetic improvement of wood quality in coastal Dougla-fir and western hemlock. Oregon State University College of Forestry 2002, pp. 67-71.
Li et al. Genetic control of bud phenology in pole-size trees and seedlings of coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 1993, pp. 1043-1051.
Heiner et al. Early Growth and Drought Avoidance in Douglas-fir Seedlings. Forest Research Laboratory, Research paper 14, 1972, pp. 1-7.
Lambeth. Juvenile-Mature Correlations in Pinaceae and Implications for Early Selection. Forest Sci., vol. 26, No. 4, 1980, pp. 571-580.
Abdel-Gadir et al., “Genetic variation in the age of demarcation between juvenile and mature wood in Douglas-fir,”Wood and Fiber Sc25(4) 1993, pp. 384-394.
Adams GW et al, “Multi-trait selection in jack pine,”Can J For Res21 1991, pp. 439-445.
Aubry CA et al., “Determination of relative economic weights for multitrait selection in coastal Douglas-Fir, ”Can J For Res28 1998, pp. 1164-1170.
Bruce D et al., “Volume equations for second-growth Douglas-fir,”USDA Forest Service Res239 1974 pp. 1-6.
Campbell RK “Phenotypic correlation among branch and upper-crown stem attributes in Douglas-Fir,”For Sci9(4) 1963, pp. 444-451.
Cline MG, “Exogenous auxin effects on lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots,”Ann Bot Co78 1996 pp. 255-266.
Cotterill PPSuccessful Tree Breeding with Index SelectionCSIRO Publications 1990 pp. 28-32.
Cotterill PP et al., “Estimates of genetic parameters for growth and form traits in fourPinus radiataD. Don Progency Tests in South Australia,”Aust For Res10 1980 pp. 155-167.
Dodd R et al., “Kinetics of tracheid differentiation in Douglas-fir,”Ann Bot Co65 1990 pp. 649-657.
Enquist BJ et al., “Global allocation rules of patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants,”Sic295 Feb. 2002 pp. 1517-1520.
Gonzalez JS et al., “Early selection for wood density in young coastal Douglas-fir trees,”Can J For Res18 1988 pp. 1182-1185.
Hannrup B et al., “Genetic correlations among wood, growth capacity and stem traits inPinus sylvestris,” Scan J For Res15 2000 pp. 161-170.
Hannrup B et al., “Genetic parameters of growth and wood quality traits inPicea abies,” Scan J For Res19 2004 pp. 14-29.
Jayawickrama KJS, “Date of earlywood-latewood transition in provenances and families of loblolly pine, and its relations to growth phenology and juvenile wood specific gravity,”Can J For Res27 1997 pp. 1245-1253.
Jermstad KD et al., “Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling adaptive traits in coastal Douglas-fir. II. Spring and fall cold-hardiness,”Theor Appl Genet102 2001 pp. 1152-1158.
Kaya Z et al., “Correlated responses of height increment and components of increment in 2-year-old Douglas-fir,”Can J For Res19 1989 pp. 1124-1130.
Keil B “PETE puts panels in perspective,”Woodbased Panels Intl17 1997, pp. 52,55,57,58
King JN et al, “Selection of crown form traits in controlled crosses of coastal Douglas-fir,”Silvae Genetica41 1992 pp. 362-370.
King JN et al, “Selection of wood density and diameter in controlled crosses of coastal Douglas-fir,”Silvae Genetica37 1988 pp. 152-157.
Kucera B “A hypothesis relating current annual height increment to juvenile wood formation in Norway Spruce,”Wood and Fiber Sci26(1) 1994 pp. 152-167.
Li P et al., “Genetic control of bud phenology in pole-size trees and seedlings of coastal Douglas-fir,”Can J For Res23 1993 pp. 1043-1051.
Megraw RA et al, “Detailed DBH density profiles of several trees from Douglas-Fir fertilizer/thinning plots,”Proc Symp Effect of Growth Acel on Prop of Wood1972 pp. G1-G24.
Persson A “How genotype and silviculture interact in forming timber properties,”Silva Fennica28 pp. 275-282, 1994.
Rehfeldt GE “Genetic variability within Douglas-Fir populations: Implications for Tree Improvement,”Silva Genetica32 1983 pp. 9-14.
St. Clair JB “Genetic variation in tree structure and its relation to size in Douglas-fir I. Biomass partitioning, foliage efficiency, stem form, and wood density,”Can J For Res24 1994 pp. 1226-1235.
St. Clair JB “Genetic variation in tree structure and its relation to size in Douglas-fir II. Crown form, branch characteristics, and foliage characters,”Can J For Res24 1994. pp. 1236-1247.
Senft JF et al., “Property profile in 60-year-old Douglas-fir,”Proceedings: A Technical Workshop: Juvenile Wood—What does it mean to foirest management and forest products?1985 pp. 17-28.
Shinozaki K et al., “A quantitative analysis of plant form—The pipe model theory II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology,”Jap J of Ecol14 1964 pp. 133-326.
Spelter H “Plywood niche narrows but producers still have ample opportunities,”PanelWorld38 1997 pp. 28-31.
Sack L “Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitionin

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for selecting conifer trees does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for selecting conifer trees, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for selecting conifer trees will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4311381

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.