Method for run-time performance tuning of an inserter system

Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Article handling

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C700S219000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06311103

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the preparation of large mailings and the like. More particularly it relates to systems and apparatus for the preparation of documents and the assembly of multiple mailpieces including such documents.
The term “mailpieces” as used herein means items intended to be delivered by a postal service or private courier service. Typically preparation of mailpieces includes, but is not limited to, printing or otherwise providing documents including variable information pertaining to addressees of the mailpieces and the assembly of such documents with other elements of the mailpiece. The term “assembly” as used herein means the execution of actions to incorporate the documents into mailpieces. Typically, such actions can include: accumulating documents with other materials such as preprinted inserts, folding and inserting the resulting accumulations into envelopes, printing addresses and other information on the outside of the envelopes, and franking the mailpiece with an appropriate postage amount.
Inserter systems for the assembly of mailpieces are well known. Typically such systems will comprise a document feeder for providing accumulations of documents and a plurality of stations (hereinafter sometimes a “chassis”) for carrying out assembly operations with such accumulations to form mailpieces. The chassis will operate cyclically, at a constant speed with accumulations advancing to the next station at fixed intervals at the end of each cycle. The document feeder will also operate at a fixed speed but will provide accumulations to the chassis at varying intervals since the number of sheets in each accumulation will vary. The general operation of such inserter systems is well known and is described, for example, in commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. application Ser. No.: 09/124,501; titled: System, Method and Apparatus for Preparation of Mailpieces; filed: Jul. 29, 1988. Except as is set forth below by way of illustration of preferred embodiments of the subject invention a more detailed description of the operation of such inserter systems is not necessary to an understanding of the subject invention.
While systems such as those described above have proven highly successful certain disadvantages remain. In particular the fact that chassis cycle at fixed intervals while documents are delivered at varying intervals means that a potential exists that no documents will be available for a particular cycle. Clearly the possibility of such “dry holes” can be eliminated simply by operating the chassis slowly enough to assure that the maximum number of sheets can be accumulated in one cycle but, equally clearly, operating at that minimal speed will be highly inefficient in the general case where relatively few accumulations with a maximum number of sheets are expected. Conversely, in mailing jobs having a relatively large number of large accumulations, running too fast will cause a large number of dry holes and a higher throughput is achieved by operating the chassis at a slower speed. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that accumulation size will vary with within mailing jobs.
Heretofore efforts to improve the operating efficiency of inserter systems have not addressed this problem in a direct, simple and cost effective manner. Thus, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,987,547 and 5,083,281; to: Rabindran et al. teach a method for optimizing system speed to minimize time lost to jams and stoppages; while U.S. Pat. No. 5,826,869; to: Nyffenegger teaches a non-standard, buffered, variable speed document feeder which it is believed would substantially add to the cost and complexity of an inserter system.
Thus it is an object of the subject invention to provide a simple, cost-effective method for tuning the performance of an inserter system during the run-time of a mailing job.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The above object is achieved and the disadvantages of the prior art are overcome in accordance with the subject invention by means of method for preparing mailpieces and an inserter system controlled in accordance with that method. The inserter system includes a chassis for assembling mailpieces, the chassis operating cyclically with successive accumulations advancing at the end of each cycle, and a document feeder for feeding accumulations of documents to the chassis, the accumulations containing varying numbers of documents the document feeder operates at a fixed linear speed, so that accumulations are available for input to the chassis at varying intervals substantially depending upon the number of documents in corresponding accumulations. Thus there is a possibility that no accumulation will be available for particular cycles of the chassis. Initially the chassis operates at a selected speed. Periodically a measure of the fraction of the cycles for which one of the accumulations is available is determined and compared to a selected value. If the comparison indicates that the fraction is too low the chassis speed is decreased; and if the fraction is too high the chassis speed is increased.
In accordance with one aspect of the subject invention, the chassis speed is increased or decreased by a predetermined fixed amount.
In accordance with another aspect of the subject invention, the fixed amount is a predetermined function of a system parameter.
In accordance with another aspect of the subject invention, the measure is the average difference, over a selected number of cycles, between the time one of the accumulations is input to the chassis and the time the chassis requested input, and the value is a selected time value.
In accordance with another aspect of the subject invention, during each of the cycles one of the accumulations can be input to the chassis during a window and the time value is selected to be slightly less than the duration of the window.
In accordance with still another aspect of the subject invention, the fraction is measured directly.
In accordance with another aspect of the subject invention, the value is a percentage slightly less than 100 percent.
Other objects and advantages of the subject invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the attached drawings and the detailed description set forth below.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3484100 (1969-12-01), Sather et al.
patent: 4194685 (1980-03-01), Hill et al.
patent: 4381447 (1983-04-01), Horvath et al.
patent: 4790119 (1988-12-01), McDaniels
patent: 4797830 (1989-01-01), Baggarly et al.
patent: 4800505 (1989-01-01), Axelrod et al.
patent: 4987547 (1991-01-01), Rabindran et al.
patent: 5220770 (1993-06-01), Szewczyk et al.
patent: 5317654 (1994-05-01), Perry et al.
patent: 5359544 (1994-10-01), Suwahara
patent: 5467434 (1995-11-01), Hower, Jr. et al.
patent: 5493106 (1996-02-01), Hunter
patent: 5618037 (1997-04-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5659481 (1997-08-01), Qutub et al.
patent: 5710874 (1998-01-01), Bergen
patent: 5730299 (1998-03-01), Helsley
patent: 5768132 (1998-06-01), Cordery et al.
patent: 5798930 (1998-08-01), van Oosten
patent: 5816715 (1998-10-01), Harman et al.
patent: 5818724 (1998-10-01), Brewster, Jr. et al.
patent: 5826869 (1998-10-01), Nyffenegger et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for run-time performance tuning of an inserter system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for run-time performance tuning of an inserter system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for run-time performance tuning of an inserter system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2578278

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.