Liquid purification or separation – Processes – Treatment by living organism
Reexamination Certificate
2000-10-19
2002-06-18
Upton, Christopher (Department: 1724)
Liquid purification or separation
Processes
Treatment by living organism
C210S605000, C210S617000, C210S630000, C210S903000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06406627
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to a system and method for removing pollution from water.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It has long been desirable to remove pollutants from water in a safe, efficient and cost-effective manner.
Agricultural, industrial, and street run-off, among other polluted water flows, require treatment before being released into the environment. The high concentration or synthetic chemistry of these wastes can overwhelm self-purifying mechanisms in the receiving environment. When this occurs, the result is contaminated ground water and/or surface water.
In high-density population areas, it is typical to have a public waste water treatment system. In less densely populated areas, where public sewage treatment is not available, many homes and businesses use a septic system, implemented on-site, for the treatment and disposal of waste water or sewage. A typical on-site waste fluid treatment system or septic system includes a mound or drain field portion and a septic tank. Waste fluids may include such things as waste from washers and dryers, showers and bathtubs, toilets, disposals, disposal waste, sink waste water and commercial operations. In a typical on-site septic system, the waste water generally drains into a septic tank before being routed to the mound or drain field. A septic tank typically functions to separate the solid and liquid fractions of the waste water, and then typically introduces the effluent back into the ecosystem with significant and undesirable nutrients and other pollution.
The average life of a conventional on-site waste water treatment system is typically only seven to 10 years. A failing system can lead to public health concerns and non-point source pollution. Another concern of the conventional on-site water treatment facility beyond its finite life, is the inability to quickly assess the proper functioning of the system. Untreated waste water may be leaking into the ecosystem with little or no surface indication.
A primary concern with any on-site septic system or waste water treatment system is to ensure that nutrients and other pollutants are removed from the waste water before the waste water is introduced back into nature. If the water is not sufficiently pollutant-free, the effluent may contaminate surface or subsurface water creating water quality problems.
Natural wetlands have been used as waste water discharge sites for a long period of time, and the ability of wetland plants to remove pollutants from waste water is fairly well known. Constructed wetlands have made limited use of natural wetland potential.
Existing constructed wetlands, including surface water and subsurface flow systems, utilize wetland plants and atmospheric diffusion to transfer oxygen into the water column. These naturally aerated (aerobic) zones support populations of bacteria which require oxygen to support their metabolisms. Other areas within the constructed wetland are anaerobic, and support populations of bacteria which do not require oxygen. It is known that aerobic metabolic pathways are much more efficient than anaerobic pathways. Consequently, aerobic bacteria are capable of consuming, and thus removing, more of a pollutant than anaerobic bacteria for a given treatment cell size. In existing constructed wetlands, aerobic zones are typically only found at the top of the water column, in those regions where there is sufficient atmospheric diffusion, and in the immediate vicinity of wetland plant root hairs, where oxygen transported by wetland plants diffuses out through the root membrane. Therefore, in current constructed wetland systems, aerobic zones occupy only a small fraction of the constructed wetland. This lack of aerobic zones places a constraint on the overall treatment capacity of the wetland, particularly in subsurface flow constructed wetlands.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to more fully utilize the pollution and nutrient reducing characteristics of wetland plants in a constructed system to treat polluted water.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a safe, efficient and cost-effective manner to reduce the pollutant level in polluted water or other fluids.
It is also an object of this invention to provide a constructed subsurface flow wetland system that can be used efficiently, effectively and safely to remove pollutants from polluted water.
It is a further object of this invention to provide for the calculated variable water level management of the water in the constructed wetland subsurface treatment system to promote a faster establishment of wetland vegetation, to promote thicker and deeper root growth of the wetland vegetation, and to thereby promote more effective pollutant removal processes.
It is a further object of this invention to provide for staged anaerobic and aerobic zones within the constructed wetland subsurface treatment cell to promote a systematic and more efficient treatment of polluted water.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3770623 (1973-11-01), Seidel
patent: 3925206 (1975-12-01), Dea
patent: 4169050 (1979-09-01), Serfling et al.
patent: 4333837 (1982-06-01), Plosz et al.
patent: 4415450 (1983-11-01), Wolverton
patent: 4793929 (1988-12-01), Kickuth et al.
patent: 4839051 (1989-06-01), Higa
patent: 4855040 (1989-08-01), Kickuth
patent: 4872985 (1989-10-01), Dinges
patent: 5017040 (1991-05-01), Mott
patent: 5050341 (1991-09-01), Breezer et al.
patent: 5087353 (1992-02-01), Todd et al.
patent: 5156741 (1992-10-01), Morrison et al.
patent: 5273653 (1993-12-01), Kikuth
patent: 5389257 (1995-02-01), Todd et al.
patent: 5601236 (1997-02-01), Wold
patent: 5676828 (1997-10-01), Kallenbach et al.
patent: 5690827 (1997-11-01), Simmering et al.
patent: 5762801 (1998-06-01), Jönsson et al.
patent: 5906745 (1999-05-01), Eto
patent: 5993649 (1999-11-01), DeBusk et al.
patent: 6126827 (2000-10-01), Johnson, Jr. et al.
patent: 6159371 (2000-12-01), Dufay
patent: 6264838 (2001-07-01), Nivens, Jr.
patent: 300015 (1992-05-01), None
patent: 4119835 (1992-12-01), None
patent: 260187 (1988-03-01), None
patent: 3052696 (1991-03-01), None
Onsite Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems,Design Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 327; 332-333; Oct. 1980.
Design and Performance of PVC Dosing Siphons, Mote et al., Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 809-813; 1983.
Wetland Vegetation, Guntenspergen et al. In Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural , Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chapter 5, pp. 73-88; 1989.
Integrated Wastewater Treatment Using Artificial Wetlands: A Gravel Marsh Case Study, Gersberg et al. In Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural, Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chapters 10, pp. 145-152; 1989.
Configuration and Substrate Design Considerations for Constructed Wetlands Wastewater Treatment, Steiner et al. In Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural, Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chapter 29, pp. 363-367; 1989.
Domestic Wastewater Treatment Using Emergent Plants Cultured in Gravel and Plastic Substrates, Burgoon et al. In Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural, Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chapter 38f, pp. 536-541; 1989.
General Design, Construction, and Operation Guidelines: Constructed Wetlands Wastewater Treatment Systems for Small Users Including Individual Residences,2d Ed. Technical Support Series, Water Management Resources Group, Tennessee Valley Authority, pp. 29-30; May 1993.
Pilot-Scale Nitrification Studies Using Vertical-Flow and Shallow Horizontal-Flow Constructed Wetland Cells, Watson et al., In Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement, CRC Press, Inc., Chapter 31, pp. 301-302, 312; 1993.
Phosphorus Removal from Wastewater in a Constructed Wetland, Davies et al., In Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement, CRC Press, Inc., Chapter 32, pp. 315-320; 1993.
Macrophyte-Mediated Oxygen Transfer in Wetlands: Transport Mechanisms and Rates, Brix,
North American Wetland Engineering, Inc.
Patterson Thuente Skaar & Christensen P.A.
Upton Christopher
LandOfFree
Method for removing pollutants from water does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for removing pollutants from water, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for removing pollutants from water will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2897078