Cutting – Processes – With subsequent handling
Reexamination Certificate
1999-10-04
2001-08-21
Goodman, Charles (Department: 3724)
Cutting
Processes
With subsequent handling
C083S098000, C083S099000, C083S100000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06276246
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to a punch which forms holes in thin sheet material and, more particularly, to an improved punch with a positive slug removal feature to facilitate punching in materials such as green ceramic sheets.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A plurality of unfired (green) ceramic sheets or tapes are used in the manufacture of multilayer ceramic substrates for integrated circuit semiconductor package structures. Via holes are punched in the ceramic green sheets to form the paths for electrical interconnections through the sheets. The step of punching the via holes in ceramic green sheets presents formidable engineering problems in view of the small size and density of the holes and of the complex hole patterns needed. The sheets themselves are typically thin: only about 0.2 mm (8 mils) thick.
It is convenient to punch via holes with a tool of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,425,829 issued to Kranik et al. In this type of tool, a plurality of punch elements are arranged in a grid on a punch head and are indexed over the green sheet which is covered by an interposer mask. The interposer mask contains openings where holes will be punched. When the punch elements contact the interposer mask, as the punch head is moved downwardly, a hole will be punched where the openings occur because the punch element will pass through the openings in the interposer mask and then through the ceramic green sheet. In other areas covered by the interposer mask (i.e., where holes are not desired), the interposer mask will cause the punch element to be retracted into the head. The green sheet is sequentially indexed through a predetermined number of positions to complete the punching of a sheet.
It is essential that the punching operation produce products free from defects. A single defect can potentially render a green sheet unsuitable for further processing. It is also essential that the punching operation be rapidly and accurately performed. Each green sheet can contain over 100,000 punched holes. Of particular concern is the adherence to the tip of the punch of a slug punched from the sheet. The inherent adhesion characteristics of the unfired green sheet are amplified by the large punching force applied over the small area of the punch tip. The diameter of the punch tip can be as small as 0.13 to 0.15 mm (5 to 6 mils) in current application and is expected to be 0.10 mm (4 mils) or less for advanced substrates, resulting in a pressure at the punch tip on the order of 2,700 kg/cm
2
. If the punch slug adheres to the punch, the slug may be drawn back into the punched hole, causing a substrate defect. To eliminate the likelihood of such defects, it has been standard practice to use two punch strokes for each hole. This practice greatly increases green sheet processing time.
The problem of slug adhesion to the punch is not limited to the punching of ceramic green sheets; rather, the problem has been discussed in other punching application references. One method adopted in punching apparatus for the removal of punch slugs is the use of either pressurized air or a vacuum to force the slug from the punch. Certain references disclose apparatus in which air is channeled through the punch to remove the slug from the tip of the punch. An example of such a reference is U.S. Pat. No. 4,628,780 issued to Hicks. This method is not practical, however, for punching extremely small diameter holes. Other applications either direct air into or apply a vacuum to a chamber below the punch to clear the slugs and do not directly address the problem of slug adherence.
The use of air flow slug removal methods in ceramic green sheet punching to achieve single stroke punching is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,111,723 issued to Andrusch et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 4,425,829 issued to Kranik et al. Kranik et al. teach a tube protruding into the die bushing which upwardly injects air into the die cavity below the punching area. This air flow induces circulation in the die bushing cavity which assists in forcibly removing slugs from the punch. The arrangement does not provide the repeatability necessary to achieve single stroke punching.
Andrusch et al. teach a single stroke punch apparatus which includes a punch and a bushing retention die plate. A support bushing is mounted in the die plate and provides support for the workpiece. The support bushing has a clearance for a punch. The apparatus also has a nozzle (or “slug removal bushing”) mounted in the die plate which provides an internal passage for the removal of punch slugs from the apparatus. A slug is punched from the workpiece through an opening in an end wall of the support bushing disposed in an aperture of the die plate. The nozzle, the support bushing, and the bushing retention die plate define a flow passage allowing gas to flow in the die plate to the opening in the support bushing. The flow passage includes a slot clearance between the end wall at the top of the nozzle and the support bushing. The gas flow impinges on the slug attached to the punch tip proximate to the end wall of the support bushing and at the top of the nozzle to remove the slug from the punch through a slug removal passage in the nozzle.
The shape of the slot clearance helps to direct the gas flow downward and away from the punch and the green sheet. U.S. Pat. No. 5,111,723 at column 5, lines 36-37. Therefore, the gas flow is parallel to the direction of travel of the punch and slug when the gas flow impinges on the slug attached to the punch tip. The tangential force of the gas flow on the slug is sometimes insufficient to blow the slug from the punch tip. In addition, the slot clearance prevents a sealed surface between the support bushing and the nozzle, thus allowing the rapid expansion of gas (air) as it enters the region immediately below this interface. Without a sealed interface, the gas tends to expand too quickly into the volume surrounding the punch tip and slug and is sometimes ineffective for blowing the slug from the punch tip.
These same problems arise for the punching tool disclosed in Japan Patent No. 5-057687 issued to Takumi et al. The die bushing of the punching tool has an air lead groove and an air passage port formed in its periphery. The die bushing also has a central hole into which the punch and slug pass. Air flows inward from the periphery of the die bushing and toward the punch through the air passage port. The air passage port is formed obliquely so that it directs the air flow downward and at a tangential angle into the central hole of the die bushing and onto the punch. In addition, the air rapidly expands in the central hole of the die bushing once it leaves the air passage port.
The punching tool disclosed in Japan Patent No. 5-261454 issued to Tomohiro similarly incorporates a slanted bore in the periphery of the die bushing. The angle of the bore is specifically set at about 10-80 degrees to assure that the air flow is directed downward toward the punch. The diameter of the bore is 1 mm or less and the force of the air flow is apparently 0.5 to 5 kg.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,214,991 issued to Shimizu et al. discloses a punching apparatus in which compressed air is made to flow at high speed parallel to the direction of travel of the punch and through the hole just formed by the punch in the green sheet. A gap is formed between the punch pin and the peripheral wall of the opening (through which the punch passes) in the stripper member disposed above the green sheet. The air flows downward through that gap where it is then sucked toward the base of the die by a suction mechanism. The downward air flow can blow a slug off the punch tip and carry the slug toward the suction mechanism.
Although the configurations discussed above have been useful in removing slugs from the punch tip, none of the configurations provide the 100% slug removal which is required for single stroke punching. A 99.9% slug removal rate on a green sheet containing 100,000 holes results in 100 defects per sheet, any one of which renders the sheet unacceptable
Bezama Raschid J.
Economikos Laertis
LaPlante Mark J.
Long David C.
O'Neil Keith C.
Blecker, Esq. Ira D.
Goodman Charles
International Business Machines - Corporation
Ratner & Prestia
LandOfFree
Method for punching slug from workpiece does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for punching slug from workpiece, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for punching slug from workpiece will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2532400