Method for producting a filter

Electrolysis: processes – compositions used therein – and methods – Electrolytic erosion of a workpiece for shape or surface... – With irradiation or illumination

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C205S656000, C205S674000, C205S666000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06328876

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention concerns a process for the production of a filter.
Such a process is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,624. In this process, the filter is produced by etching a p- or n-doped silicon blank. The silicon blank forms the underside of a vessel, filled with etching liquid, wherein an O-ring and a pressure clamp, which press the silicon blank against the vessel, are provided for the sealing. During the etching process, the silicon blank is connected to the anode of a current source, and a cathode is immersed in the etching liquid. The silicon blank thus forms a “working electrode,” which is electrochemically perforated as a function of the doping, the current density, and the composition of the etching liquid.
DE 4202454 C1 describes a similar etching process, in which an n-doped silicon disk is additionally radiated with light for the purposeful production of minority charge carriers. The minority charge carriers move to the side of the silicon disk, which is wetted with etching liquid—preferably to the surface recesses, on which the electrical field strength is increased and the etching erosion is particularly strong. Holes are formed at these places and their formation can be influenced by the illumination.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,348,627 describes a semiconductor etching process, in which lenses or other optical devices, such as reflecting or partially absorbing masks, are also provided, through which the irradiation of the silicon blank can take place. The masks are used for the production of collimated irradiation, and the lenses, for the variation of the light intensity. The optical devices are therefore used for the purposeful “control” of the direction of the light rays, wherein it becomes possible for only certain “zones”—that is, for only certain partial areas of the silicon blank which are to be etched, to be irradiated, which involves a great technical outlay.
A similar etching process for the production of holes or pits in n-doped silicon is described in EP 0 296 348 A1, in which the substrate is also connected as an anode, is located on the underside of a vessel filled with a hydrofluoric acid-containing electrolyte, and is irradiated with light.
With the process of the state of the art, in which the blank to be etched is located on the underside of the etching vessel, a sealing of the chemically very aggressive etching liquid is difficult and involves an undesired great outlay and high costs.
In such arrangements, the case may also arise that on the boundary areas of the blank, the etching takes place at an angle to the surface, which is undesirable. In order to obtain a filter surface of a defined size, the boundary areas must be cut off after the etching treatment, wherein the production expense is further increased.
Another problem, which appears, in particular with the mass or serial production of filters, is the maintenance of identical production parameters—that is, the production of filters with identical characteristics (pore diameter, surface density of the pores, filter area, etc.). With the other processes, namely, the finished filter must be removed from the etching vessel. This requires an emptying and a subsequent refilling of the vessel, which is not desired with regard to the maintenance of constant process parameters.
Other filters for the separation of various substances in media, such as fluids, are, for example, membrane filters, network filters, deep-bed filters, or ultrafilters, which are made, for example, of mixtures of cellulose acetate and cellulose nitrate, cellulose polymers, woven nylon or metal threads, metallic silver, glass fibers, and microglass fibers.
The disadvantage with these filters is that they do not have an exactly defined hole structure and in particular, their pore diameters are not clearly defined. Liquid is kept in channel-like structures of the filter due to surface tension and when using a certain pressure, the liquid is expelled. In the so-called bubble test for the integrity test of filters, the corresponding formula is as follows:
P
=
K
·
4

σ



cos



θ
d
P: Bubble point pressure
d: Diameter of the pores
K: Shape correction factor
è: Angle of contact between the liquid and the solid
ó: Surface tension
The pore diameter d goes into this experimentally obtained formula. From the formula, it is clear, however, that the influence of the other parameters leads, nevertheless, to undesirable substances or particles with dimensions that are larger than the approximation value d for the hole diameters passing through the filter.
Another disadvantage of the known filters is that they are not resistant chemically and are attacked, for example, by diverse acids, such as concentrated nitric acid, concentrated sulfuric acid, or concentrated hydrochloric acid, numerous solvents, such as, among others, methylene chloride, perchloroethylene, etc., and gases, such as ozone, which renders their use problematic or in some application cases, impossible.
Furthermore, many known filters are also not temperature-resistant. For example, traditional membrane filters made of polyvinyl dichloride can be autoclaved only up to ca. 130° C. according to the manufacturer's data. Nylon network filters are resistant between −45° C. and +115° C. only when dry, but not during the filtration. Isopore membrane filters are temperature-resistant only up to ca. 140° C.
Moreover, the costs of such filters rise considerably with the filter diameter in a direction transverse to the flow direction of the fluid.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The goal of the invention is therefore to indicate a process for the production of filters which makes possible a series production with defined filter surface size, a constant and exactly definable hole diameter, and, if especially desired, uniformly distributed or structured hole configurations, and is a process which can be used at low cost. The filters should have good chemical resistance and good temperature resistance.
The basic principle of the invention consists in an electrochemical etching process, in which a weak n- or p-doped semiconductor, and in particular, silicon, is connected as an anode or cathode, depending on the doping, and is etched with an etching solution, wherein a holding element is affixed to the semiconductor, with this element being chemically resistant with respect to the etching solution. For the etching, the semiconductor affixed to the holding element is immersed in the etching liquid, until one side of the semiconductor is wetted with etching liquid. The holding element “bounds” hereby the area of the semiconductor wetted by the etching liquid—that is, an arbitrarily “sharply delimited” filter area can be produced by the shape of the holding element.
The electrolytic etching is based on the fact that the electrical field in the doped semiconductor is “bent” by even the smallest recesses or irregularities in the planar surface of the blank toward their peaks or bottoms. Minority charge carriers follow the electrical field, which leads to the etching taking place primarily on the bottoms or peaks of the recesses. The etching of the existing recesses is therefore preferred and creates well-defined channels in the blank.
Minority charge carriers can be produced by illumination with a light source, which can be constant or is controllable. The current flowing in the blank or the concentration of the minority charge carriers is thus dependent on the intensity of the illumination. By adjusting the process parameters:
etching time
concentration of the etching solution
doping of the blank
applied potential
intensity of the illumination,
it is possible to adjust the distribution of the individual channels and their diameters. Depending on the doping, one attains channel diameters down to 1-2 nm. The doping substance concentration of the weakly doped silicon is thereby in the range of 10
15
to 10
18
cm
−3
. With doping substance concentrations greater than 10
19
cm
−3
, channel diameters of

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for producting a filter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for producting a filter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for producting a filter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2581269

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.