Metal treatment – Process of modifying or maintaining internal physical... – Magnetic materials
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-04
2002-08-13
Sheehan, John (Department: 1742)
Metal treatment
Process of modifying or maintaining internal physical...
Magnetic materials
C148S113000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06432222
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method for producing a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet used mainly for iron cores of transformers and the like.
2. Description of the Related Art
Various technologies have been proposed for stably producing a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties with a magnetic flux density B
8
(magnetic flux density in a magnetic field of 800 A/m) exceeding 1.9 T. The technologies can be classified, generally, into the following three groups.
The first group of technologies consists of a method of heating a slab to an ultra high temperature of 1,350 to 1,450° C., at the maximum, and retaining the slab at the heating temperature for a period of time sufficient for heating (soaking) the entire slab. The object of this method is to change substances uniformly acting as inhibitors, such as MnS, AlN, etc., into complete solutions in order to activate them as inhibitors necessary for secondary recrystallization. Since the complete solution heat treatment is also effective as a measure to eliminate a difference in the intensity of the inhibitors in different parts of a slab, the above method is reasonable in this respect for realizing stable production of the products.
In the above method, however, the heating temperature necessary for the complete solution of substances having the inhibition capacity, or the complete solution temperature, is very high. Since the slab has to be heated, in actual production practices, to a temperature equal to or above the complete solution temperature (an ultra high temperature) in order to secure the amounts of inhibitors necessary for secondary recrystallization, the method involves various problems in actual production practice.
The problems include, for example, the following: {circle around (1)} it is difficult to secure a desired rolling temperature during hot rolling and, when the desired temperature is not achieved, poor secondary recrystallization occurs because inhibitor intensity becomes uneven in a slab; {circle around (2)} coarse grains form during the heating for hot rolling and the portions with the coarse grains fail to re-crystallize at the secondary recrystallization, leading to streaks; {circle around (3)} slab surface layers melt into slag, which in turn requires a large amount of manpower for the maintenance of reheating furnaces; and {circle around (4)} product yield decreases because huge edge cracks occur in the hot rolled steel strips.
As improvements to the first group technologies, methods intended to stabilize the secondary recrystallization by applying a nitriding treatment after primary recrystallization based on the above method are known, such as those disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. H1-168817, etc. The problem this method can solve, however, is only the one described in {circle around (1)} above, and the solution of the problems in field production practices described in {circle around (2)} to {circle around (4)} above still remains difficult.
The second group of technologies combine the use of AlN as an inhibitor, heating of a slab to below 1,280° C. and a nitriding treatment after a decarburization annealing and before the commencement of the secondary recrystallization, as disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publications Nos. S59-56522, H5-112827 and H9-118964, etc. In a method like the above, it is very important, to obtain a satisfactory secondary recrystallization, to control the mean size of primary recrystallization grains after the decarburization annealing within a prescribed range, usually 18 to 35 &mgr;m, as shown, for example, in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. H2-182866.
Besides the above, Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. H5-295443 discloses a method to control the steel composition, etc., in order to minimize solute nitrogen, etc., at heating during hot rolling, for the purpose of homogenizing the size of the primary recrystallization grains in a coil, based on the fact that the solid solution amount in steel of the substances having the inhibition capacity such as solute nitrogen at heating during hot rolling, etc., determines the growth of the primary recrystallization grains.
By this method, although, however accurately controlled the steel composition may be, uneven distribution of the solute nitrogen, etc., remains in a slab, and it is impossible to eliminate, in the strict meaning of the word, the uneven distribution of the inhibition intensity, or that of the primary recrystallization grain size, within a coil. This results in a problem that it is sometimes difficult to obtain homogeneous secondary recrystallization within a coil (skid mark). Thus the above method is not an industrially stable production method.
The third group of technologies consist of a method to use Cu
x
S (x=1.8 or 2) as an inhibitor and heat a slab to a temperature equal to or above the complete solution temperature of Cu
x
S and equal to or below the complete solution temperature of MnS, as disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. H6-322443, etc. The characteristics of this method lie in lowering the slab heating temperature and making additional process steps, such as the nitriding treatment employed in the second group of technologies, unnecessary.
This method, however, has a problem similar to the one involved in the second group of technologies (skid mark), because the slab heating temperature is equal to or below the complete solution temperature of MnS, and thus it is not an industrially stable production method, either. Besides, although Cu
x
S is widely known as an inhibitor to control the secondary recrystallization, it is inappropriate for the production of a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet having high magnetic flux density especially when a final cold rolling reduction ratio exceeds 80% (Tetsu-to-Hagané, p. 2049, No. 15, Vol. 70, 1984).
Generally speaking, whether or not it is possible to obtain a secondary recrystallization having good magnetic properties is determined mainly by the grain diameter of the primary recrystallization and secondary inhibitors to control the secondary recrystallization. While the grain diameter of the primary recrystallization by the first group technologies is about 10 &mgr;m, for example, the same by the second group technologies is 18 to 35 &mgr;m. The fact that it is possible to obtain a good secondary recrystallization by either the first or the second group of technologies, in spite of the fact that the diameter of the primary recrystallization grains is greatly different by the two groups of technologies as the examples above, indicates that the combination of the grain diameter of the primary recrystallization and the secondary inhibitors necessary to obtain a sharp Goss (the {110}<001> orientations) secondary recrystallization, is not unique.
In view of the above fact, the present inventors carried out a series of studies based on an idea that it was possible to obtain a sharp Goss secondary recrystallization by controlling the secondary inhibitors, regardless of the size of the primary recrystallization grains.
For the purpose of establishing a method to stably produce the product under the above facts, the present inventors classified the inhibitors indispensable for the production of a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, by the process step where they function, into two groups, namely primary inhibitors to control the size of the primary recrystallization grains and secondary inhibitors to control that of the secondary recrystallization grains, and studied them in relation to the production of a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties.
It has to be noted here that, although it is true that the combination of the primary recrystallization grain size and the secondary inhibitors necessary, for obtaining a sharp Goss secondary recrystallization, is not uniquely defined, if the primary recrystallization grain size is different in differe
Fujii Norikazu
Kumano Tomoji
Mogi Hisashi
Ohata Yoshifumi
Yamamoto Norihiro
Nippon Steel Corporation
Sheehan John
LandOfFree
Method for producing a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for producing a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for producing a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2925537