Plastic and nonmetallic article shaping or treating: processes – With measuring – testing – or inspecting
Reexamination Certificate
2001-07-11
2004-06-22
Lechert, Jr., Stephen J. (Department: 1732)
Plastic and nonmetallic article shaping or treating: processes
With measuring, testing, or inspecting
C264S115000, C264S118000, C264S120000, C264S122000, C264S123000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06752939
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The subject invention relates to an apparatus for fabricating small compacts, and a method for determining if a drug candidate, alone or in a formula mix, is suitable for dry granulation by a roller compactor based on test results generated in part from such small compact. The method is particularly useful when large quantities necessary to run a conventional roller compactor are difficult and/or costly to acquire. The subject invention permits accurate prediction of full-scale production results from relatively small sample sizes of drug candidate.
2. Background of the Related Art
In order for medicinal substances to be compressed into a solid dosage form, such as a tablet, it is necessary that the material possess a number of physical characteristics. These characteristics include the ability to flow freely, cohesiveness, and lubrication.
Free flow of material is necessary to prevent clogging of a conventional compression press. Material to be made into a compact must freely flow from the source of the material to the die. The material must also possess some degree of cohesiveness to keep the compact from crumbling and falling apart on handling. Lastly, the material must have a degree of lubrication in order to minimize friction and to allow for the removal of the compact. With regard to compactions to be used as final dosage forms, they must also possess a suitable degree of hardness, disintegration ability and uniformity.
While certain materials (such as potassium salts, ammonium chloride and methenamine) may be directly compressed into final dosage forms without modifying the physical nature of the material itself, or are therapeutically effective in such low amounts that they may be compressed into a solid dosage form merely by mixing with a diluent possessing suitable compression characteristics, most materials require regimented processing prior to compression. For example, a fine powder may not flow properly into a tablet press or the resulting tablet may not possess the required hardness to maintain integrity during packaging and shipping. Methods of formulation and preparation have been developed to impart desirable characteristics to materials that can not be compressed directly into a final dosage form. Among the methods used to improve the physical characteristics of materials are: forming an admixture with one or more inert substances, communition of the material, and granulation of the material or material formulation.
Addition of one or more inert substances (e.g. excipients) can significantly improve the qualities of a material which is desired to be compressed. Excipients that provide a specific function are well known. In diluting the active with inert substances, it is important that the blend of ingredients for production be homogeneous and provide good powder flow characteristics.
Comminution in its broadest sense is the mechanical process of reducing the size of particles or aggregates and embraces a wide variety of operations including cutting, chopping, grinding, crushing, milling, micronizing and trituration. Materials are often comminuted to improve flow properties and compressibility. Flow properties and compressibility of materials are influenced significantly by particle size or surface area of the particle.
Conversion of powders to granules (a small cohesive mass made up of a plurality of powder particles) frequently offers a number of advantages including improving uniformity of the blend, improving uniformity of particle size, reducing dust hazards, allowing improved product flow, improving uniform bulk density, controlling particle hardness and improving dispersability. Two of the most commonly employed granulation methods are wet-granulation and dry-granulation.
In wet-granulation, a liquid binder solution is combined with a bed of mixed powders to mass the particles together into granules. The damp mass is then screened, dried and milled (as through a comminuting mill or tornado mill) to the desired size. The mass may also be dry screened, lubricated and compressed or extruded through a perforated screen and then dried. In drying, it is often desirable to maintain a residual amount of moisture in the granulation in order to maintain a hydrated state and to reduce static electric charges on the particles. Moisture content of the granulation should be uniform.
Wet granulation suffers from a number of disadvantages. A chief disadvantage is the number of separate steps involved, as well as the time and labor necessary to carry out the procedure. Further, the use of aqueous solvents is limited by the stability of the product to be granulated. Explosion concerns and environmental regulations may limit the use of certain organic solvents.
Dry granulation is used when materials have sufficient inherent binding or cohesive properties to form granules. Dry granulation refers to the process of granulating without the use of liquids. In order for a material to be dry granulated at least one of its constituents, either the active ingredient or a diluent, must have cohesive properties.
Dry granulation may be performed by a process known as “slugging.” In “slugging” the material to be granulized is first made into a large compressed mass or “slug” typically by way of a tablet press using large flat-faced tooling (an example of a linear press is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,880,373 to Balog et al. which is incorporated by reference herein). A fairly dense slug may be formed by allowing sufficient time for the air to escape from the material to be compacted. Compressed slugs are then comminuted through a desired mesh screen manually or automatically as, for example, by way of a comminuting mill. Formation of granules by “slugging” is also known as precompression. When tablets are made from the granulated slugged material, the process is referred to as the “double compression method.”
Dry granulation may also be performed using a “roller compactor.” In a roller compactor material particles are consolidated and densified by passing the material between two high-pressure rollers. The densified material from a roller compactor is then reduced to a uniform granule size by milling. The uniform granules may then be mixed with other substances, such as a lubricant, to tablet the material (as, for example, by way of a rotary tableting machine). In addition to pharmaceutical use, roller compaction is used in other industries, such as the food industry, animal feed industry and fertilizer industry.
Dry granulation has several advantages over wet granulation including its usefulness with respect to ingredients that are sensitive to moisture or unable to withstand elevated temperatures during drying, and because it does not use organic solvents which may pose health and environmental hazards. There are also fewer steps involved in dry granulation than wet granulation. Dry granulation by means of roller compaction is an efficient and useful method of granulation capable of handling a large amount of material in a short period of time (dry granulation by “slugging,” on the other hand, may be slow, inefficient, and many times requires several attempts at a successful formulation to ensure material flow).
An early understanding of the compaction properties of a candidate drug substance is important. The need for viable dosage forms of candidate drug substances for pharmacological testing purposes, often significantly precedes the ability of a company to synthesize large quantities of the candidate drug. Unfortunately in early-stage pharmaceutical development it is often the case that only small batch sizes of candidate drug substances are available for pharmaceutical and pharmacological characterization. With limited supply of a drug substance available, losses due to the employment of less than efficient formulation techniques may not be easily tolerated.
As stated above, the ability of a material to be dry granulated by a roller compactor offers many advantages. Unfortunately conventional roller compactors require a
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Bottino Anthony P.
Lechert Jr. Stephen J.
Raymond Robert P.
Witkowski Timothy X.
LandOfFree
Method for predicting the suitability of a substance for dry... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for predicting the suitability of a substance for dry..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for predicting the suitability of a substance for dry... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3347952