Electricity: measuring and testing – Electrolyte properties – Using a conductivity determining device
Reexamination Certificate
1999-06-15
2001-05-15
Brown, Glenn W. (Department: 2858)
Electricity: measuring and testing
Electrolyte properties
Using a conductivity determining device
C324S071100, C324S444000, C073S061410, C073S019100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06232783
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of fluid contamination monitors and, in particular, to methods and apparatus for detecting specific contaminants in potable and non-potable water flows using selective film.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) mandates that municipal water utilities monitor their water. Under the SDWA, the number of monitoring sites in the outgoing distribution system depends upon the number of customers served by the utility. For example, in large utilities serving more than 100,000 customers, the utilities must provide monitoring at 100 sites in the distribution system.
In the drinking water filtration industry, common contaminants of concern are trihalomethanes, biological contamination, nitrate and heavy metals, such as lead. Each are removed by different means within the filtration system. Trihalomethanes are effectively removed with charcoal. Biological contamination such as cysts are removed with fine mesh mechanical filtration. Nitrate and lead are removed by either of two methods, reverse osmosis (RO) or ion exchange resins.
RO systems are effective for removing nitrates and heavy metals. Most quality systems offer a monitor that indicates that there is a rupture in the RO membrane and thus the system requires membrane replacement. Such monitors generally measure the conductivity of the input water and the output water. When the membrane is intact, the conductivity of the input water will differ from that of the output water to the extent that the system is removing inorganic contaminants from the water. When the membrane ruptures, allowing the input water to flow through the membrane, the difference between the conductivity of the input water and the output water will lessen beyond a pre-set threshold and trigger a signal to the user. A disadvantage to RO systems is that they require about five gallons of water to back-flush the membrane for every filtered gallon available for use. For a typical system delivering five gallons of water per day, an RO system will use up to 25 gallons of water per day to back-flush. Thus, while effective for removing inorganic contaminants, RO systems are very wasteful of water.
Ion exchange resins come from the manufacturer in the form of beads, having ion exchange sites on the beads. Cation resins commonly have sodium on the exchange sites and anion resins commonly have chloride ions on the exchange sites. In ion exchange resins, heavier ions displace lighter ions. The following table sets forth a list of cations together with their selectivity coefficients. Selectivity coefficients are indicators of the preference of the resin for each of the ions relative to hydrogen.
TABLE 1
Cation Selectivity Coefficients of Four Cation Resins
selectivity coefficients
Cross-linking, wt %
Ion
symbol
4
8
12
16
hydrogen
H
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
iron
Fe
2.4
2.55
2.7
2.9
zinc
Zn
2.6
2.7
2.8
3.0
cadmium
Cd
2.8
2.95
3.3
3.95
calcium
Ca
3.4
3.9
4.6
5.8
strontium
Sr
3.9
4.95
6.25
8.1
copper
Cu
3.2
5.3
9.5
14.5
mercury
Hg
5.1
7.2
9.7
14.0
lead
Pb
5.4
7.5
10.1
14.5
As can be seen from the chart, cations such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn) and calcium (Ca) have lower preference ratings than mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb). For example, in a cation resin bed having Ca on the exchange sites, if Hg were introduced into the bed, the Hg ions would displace the Ca ions, since Hg is more highly preferred by the ion exchange resin than Ca. If Pb were subsequently introduced, the Pb would displace lighter ions on the resin, and so on.
There are some batch on-line analyzers available on the market that can detect and quantify the presence of contaminants. However, each of these systems is extremely expensive. One system, ChemScan Process Analyzers, available from Applied Spectrometry Associates, Inc. of Waukesha, Wis., uses ultraviolet-visible spectrometry to detect contaminants. This analyzer costs in the $20,000-$40,000 range depending on the contaminants being detected. Ionics, Inc. of Watertown, Mass. offers the OVA 3000 series Trace Chemical Analyzers using the Wet Chemical method for lighter metals and Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for heavier metals. Those systems cost about $40,000. For a large system, having 100 sites, the capital cost of installing such systems would be $4,000,000, which, for a utility serving 100,000 customers, would effect a $40 per customer one time charge for water monitoring. Thus, there is a need for a continuous, on-line system that is economical.
Though water is monitored when it leaves the municipal water plant, some contaminants may get into the water before the water is dispensed from the household tap. One contaminant of special note, lead, is highly toxic. It is present in lead solder in household plumbing, sometimes in the plumbing itself and sometimes in the water's delivery system. Water filtration systems that rely on cation exchange resin technology to remove lead or other toxic heavy metals can work effectively until the ion exchange system is no longer able to capture all of the heavy metals. This point is called the break-through stage. Therefore, it is necessary to detect when the break-through stage is reached. However, the monitor used to detect rupture in an RO membrane will not work in this application as exchange resins saturate gradually with no clearly detectable event such as occurs when an RO membrane ruptures. Thus, there is a need for a monitor to detect the presence of a specific ion, which is a threshold ion in a water filtration system.
Referring to the table, the logical stage to detect cation breakthrough in water from municipal water systems is at the copper level, having the effect of maximizing the longevity of the filtration cartridge and minimizing the health risks. However, an earlier stage threshold ion of cation breakthrough, such as zinc, is preferred for well water users to protect from such harmful ions as cadmium, which would be removed by municipal systems but may be present in wells.
Until recent years, standard anion exchange resins were used to remove nitrate from water. However, sulfates, which are common in nature, had higher selectivity coefficients than nitrate. The result was nitrate sloughing or dumping. That is, if an anion resin column was saturated with nitrate and sulfate was introduced into the column, the sulfates would displace the nitrates, thus, dumping the previously accumulated nitrates into the output water of a filter. Since nitrate has no taste, color or smell, the user was unaware of this event. To correct the problem, ion exchange resin manufacturers developed nitrate selective anion exchange resins which reversed the selectivity coefficients of nitrate and sulfates and thus the problem was solved. However, a disadvantage to using nitrate selective anion resins is that they are about 33% less efficient, i.e., the nitrate selective resins last about a third less long than a conventional anion exchange resin column. Thus, a monitor using nitrate as a target ion would allow the use of the more efficient conventional anion resin, maximize its longevity, and provide an alert to the user that the filter cartridge needed replacement.
In addition to the SDWA, the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that wastewater treatment plants monitor the influent to their plants for specified contaminants. The CWA also specifies that industrial companies monitor their effluent that feeds into the wastewater stream. Such companies are referred to as Significant Industrial Users or SIU's. These SIU's will typically enter into pre-treatment agreements with their wastewater treatment plants covering the frequency of their monitoring requirement and the contaminants to be monitored.
The following table shows the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL's) in parts per million (ppm) of selected inorganic contaminants as mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Water Act:
Contaminant
Symbol
MCL (ppm)
Copper
Cu
1.3
Lead
Pb
0.015
Zinc
Zn
5.0
Mercury
Hg
0.002
Arsenic
As
0.050
The frequency of monitoring of
Brown Glenn W.
Hamdan Wasseem
Ritchie William B.
LandOfFree
Method for monitoring an aqueous flow using selective film does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for monitoring an aqueous flow using selective film, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for monitoring an aqueous flow using selective film will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2468614