Method for measurement of total analyte

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving antigen-antibody binding – specific binding protein...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C435S007200, C435S007800, C435S007900, C435S174000, C435S180000, C436S501000, C436S518000, C436S523000, C436S524000, C436S533000, C436S534000, C436S536000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06692921

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
A The present invention relates to the field of immunoassays. The invention provides a simple and convenient method suitable for the measurement of a range of different types of analyte which occur, either totally or partially complexed with soluble binding proteins or receptors, in serum or plasma. The invention also relates to kits of reagents suitable for performing measurements of analytes using separation-based or homogeneous immunoassays.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
For more than thirty years, immunoassays have been the method of choice for measuring low analyte concentrations in complex biological fluids. The procedure is equally applicable to the measurement is of low molecular weight compounds such as drugs, steroids and the like, as well as large molecular weight compounds such as protein molecules. The technique combines sensitivity and specificity and have been used in basic biological research to investigate the physiological and possible pathological role of a wide range of potent biologically active substances, including cytokines, steroid hormones, cyclic nucleotides, prostaglandins, leukotrienes and growth factors. Assay designs have proliferated over the last thirty years, as have the different types of signal reagents and detection systems. Sophisticated instruments with associated computer hardware have been developed with the aim of increasing sample throughput. Further background information relating to immunoassay techniques can be found in ‘The Immunoassay Handbook’, (Wild, D. G. Ed, Stockton Press, New York, [1994]).
The earliest methods were those which involved a step of separating the bound analyte from the free, in order to be able to measure the amount of bound analyte. Various separation methods have been described, including charcoal absorption, ammonium sulphate precipitation. More recently, solid supports have been utilised for immunoassay procedures, including magnetic particles and the walls of microtitre well plates. A recent development has been the introduction of homogeneous radioimmunoassay technology, e.g. the technique of scintillation proximity assays (SPA) covered by U.S. Pat. No.4,568,649.
As an alternative to radioisotopically-based immunoassay methods, non-radioactive systems have been introduced. Today, enzymes are the most widely used tracers in such immunoassay systems as ELISAs and EIAs. When used in combination with colourimetric end-points, they provide highly sensitive, robust, precise, accurate and convenient immunoassays. A major breakthrough came with the introduction of ninety-six well microtitre plates. Inexpensive automatic colourimetric multiwell plate readers are available. A number of other non-isotopic labels have been described, of which luminescent and fluorescent labels are the most popular.
Despite the widespread use of immunoassays, there are still difficulties in the measurement of analytes derived from particular sample types, notably plasma and serum, in which the analyte may be totally or partially complexed with a soluble receptor or binding protein. Engelberts et al (The Lancet, 338, 515∝6, 1991) have compared the results of the measurement of TNF&agr; in plasma samples from septic shock patients using a range of assay types and have noted a marked variation in the amount of TNF detected. In this context, it has been suggested that TNF binding proteins present in biological fluids prevent the biological activity of TNF and cause discrepancies between various assay measurements. The difficulty in measuring analytes in the form of their complexes with soluble receptors or binding proteins, may be due to the masking of antibody binding sites.
This problem has been addressed previously by the development of an “oligoclonal” assay system (Medgenix), in which up to three non-neutralising monoclonal antibodies are used in a standard ELISA assay for the measurement of cytokines. In this assay format, monoclonal antibodies are selected to recognise epitopes which are recognisably different from the binding site of the receptor or binding protein. As a result the assay is claimed to suffer no interference from soluble receptors or inhibitors and is capable of measuring total cytokine.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,121,975 (Ullman and Lavine) describes a method for pre-treatment of serum samples prior to the determination by immunoassay of polyiodothyronine, particularly thyroxine. In this assay, alkaline salicylate is added to serum as an agent to release thyroxine from its binding protein. Alpha-cyclodextrin is also included in the serum sample to complex naturally occurring, endogenous interfering molecules such as free fatty acids, lipids, and drugs. Cyclodextrin was not added to serum to sequester the salicylate or to safeguard the antibody components of the immunoassay. Moreover, the method is described for use with only one analyte.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,798,804 (Khanna and Pearlman) describe a method for serum pre-treatment prior to digoxin immunoassay. The method comprises contacting the serum sample to be analysed with &bgr;-cyclodextrin or &bgr;-cyclodextrin polymer in an amount and under conditions sufficient to allow a substantial portion of digoxin in the sample to bind to the &bgr;-cyclodextrin. The &bgr;-cyclodextrin-digoxin complex is separated from the other components of the medium by filtration or centrifugation, and the digoxin from the sample is thus highly concentrated. The digoxin is released from the &bgr;-cyclodextrin complex using cyclohexanol to provide a digoxin sample which may be analysed by a number of immunoassay techniques.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In view of the needs of the prior art, the present invention provides a method of assaying for an analyte which occurs at least partially bound as a complex with its soluble receptor or binding protein. The method includes the step of forming a fluid mixture by mixing a biological fluid sample containing the analyte to be determined with a detergent for dissociating the complex. The method also includes mixing the fluid mixture obtained from the forming step with reagents, including a specific binding partner of the analyte for binding to the analyte, and performing a specific binding assay for the analyte. The method further includes the step of mixing the fluid mixture obtained from the forming step with a sequestrant and a detergent, whereby the specific binding assay of the mixing step is performed in the presence of the sequestrant. The present invention also provides a kit adaptable for performing the method of the present invention.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5516647 (1996-05-01), Husain et al.
patent: 5558986 (1996-09-01), Lundin
patent: 5646005 (1997-07-01), Kudsk
patent: 5705345 (1998-01-01), Lundin et al.
patent: 0301847 (1988-07-01), None
patent: 0348173 (1989-07-01), None
patent: 9212253 (1992-07-01), None
Park et al Archives of biochemistry and biophysics Aug. 15, 1984 233 1 290-8.*
Nelson Analytical Biochem 165, 287-293 (1987).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for measurement of total analyte does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for measurement of total analyte, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for measurement of total analyte will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3279502

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.