Textiles: fluid treating apparatus – Machines – Liquid supply or vapor supply to liquid
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-25
2003-09-09
Einsmann, Margaret (Department: 1751)
Textiles: fluid treating apparatus
Machines
Liquid supply or vapor supply to liquid
C068S184000, C068S189000, C008S475000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06615620
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to generally to textile dyeing and more particularly to the introduction of dyes and other chemicals into a process for dyeing a textile material in a supercritical fluid.
BACKGROUND ART
It will be appreciated by those having ordinary skill in the art that conventional aqueous dyeing processes for textile materials, particularly hydrophobic textile materials, generally provide for effective dyeing, but possess many economic and environmental drawbacks. Particularly, aqueous dyebaths that include organic dyes and co-solvents must be disposed of according to arduous environmental standards. Additionally, heat must be applied to the process to dry the textile material after dyeing in an aqueous bath. Compliance with environmental regulations and process heating requirements thus drive up the costs of aqueous textile dyeing to both industry and the consuming public alike. Accordingly, there is a substantial need in the art for an alternative dyeing process wherein such problems are avoided.
One alternative to aqueous dyeing that has been proposed in the art is the dyeing of textile materials, including hydrophobic textile materials like polyester, in a supercritical fluid. Particularly, textile dyeing methods using supercritical fluid carbon dioxide (SCF—CO
2
) have been explored.
However, those in the art who have attempted to dye textile materials, including hydrophobic textile materials, in SCF—CO
2
have encountered a variety of problems. These problems include, but are not limited to, “crocking” (i.e. tendency of the dye to smudge when the dyed article is touched) of the dye on the dyed textile article; unwanted deposition of the dye onto the article and/or onto the dyeing apparatus during process termination; difficulty in characterizing solubility of the dyes in SCF—CO
2
; difficulty introducing the dyes into the SCF—CO
2
flow; and difficulty in preparing the dyes for introduction into the dyeing process. These problems are exacerbated when attempts to extrapolate from a laboratory process to a plant-suitable process are made.
PCT Publication No. WO 97/13915, published Apr. 17, 1997, designating Eggers et al. as inventors (assigned to Amman and Söhne GmbH and Co.) discloses a system for introducing dye into a CO
2
dyeing process which comprises a bypass flow system associated with the main circulation system that includes a color preparing vessel. The bypass is opened, after a certain temperature and pressure are reached, so that SCF—CO
2
flows through the color preparing vessel and dissolves the previously loaded dye(s). The SCF—CO
2
-containing dissolved dye flows from the bypass back into the main circulation system where it joins the bulk of the SCF—CO
2
flow that is used to accomplish dyeing.
PCT Publication No. WO 97/14843, published Apr. 24, 1997, designating Eggers et al. as inventors (assigned to Amman and Söhne GmbH and Co.) discloses a method for dyeing a textile substrate in at least one supercritical fluid, wherein the textile substrate is preferably a bobbin and the fluid is preferably SCF—CO
2
. The disclosed invention attempts to prevent color spots from forming on the textile substrate during dyeing and is directed to ways of incorporating the dye material into the supercritical fluid using the basic bypass system as described above in PCT WO 97/13915.
The method involves the use of at least one dye which is contacted with the supercritical fluid as a dye bed, dye melt, dye solution, and/or dye dispersion before and/or during actual dyeing in an attempt to form a stable solution of dye in the supercritical fluid. A stated goal is avoiding the formation of dye agglomerates having a particle size of more than 30 microns, preferably more than 15 microns, in the solution.
This invention attempts to accomplish these aims through a variety of embodiments. In one embodiment, the dye bed is provided with inert particles, in particularly glass and/or steel balls, to prevent agglomeration. Alternatively, the dye bed itself can consist of inert particles coated with the dye. SCF—CO
2
is then passed through the dye bed to incorporate the dye within the SCF—CO
2
.
However, there are a number of significant drawbacks to this embodiment of the dye introduction method disclosed by Eggers et al. PCT Publication No. WO 97/14843. For example, use of a fixed or fluidized bed to introduce dye into the dyeing system can be hindered if appropriate flow conditions are not present. The dye particles must be at all times in intimate and vigorous contact with the supercritical fluid for effective dissolution. If this is not the case, the dissolution rate will be low and will likely not be complete by the end of the dyeing cycle.
Moreover, promotion of a high convective mass transfer coefficient (i.e., intimate and vigorous mixing) can result in substantial pressure losses through the dye-add vessel. Because of their relatively low viscosity values, supercritical fluids are easily diverted to areas of lower resistance, which can lead to mechanical problems such as channeling and stagnation. Channeling refers to the development of a fluid path, or channel, through a particulate bed that circumvents uniform flow throughout the bed; i.e., a stream of fluid develops through the bed such that the flow in the region where the stream exists is greater than the flow of fluid in the rest of the bed. In this case, the particles not in the channel are not properly contacted by the fluid. These conditions, in turn, result in dye particles not being contacted in a manner that will allow substantially complete dissolution.
Insuring the proper flow conditions when using fluidized dye beds, fixed dye beds, or dye bed holding devices requires very careful and complex design of the internals of the dye-add vessel in order to assure good mixing and to avoid mechanical flow problems without excessive pressure drop. Indeed, it is likely that dye bed holding devices that are chambered to force uniform flow of fluid through the bed, such as those proposed for use in dye introduction by Eggers et al., PCT Publication No. WO 97/14843, also suffer very high pressure losses.
Another drawback arises when the fluidized and fixed dye bed is installed in the system in a bypass loop. Since the dye dissolution process is rate limiting, this arrangement couples the dyeing process to the dye dissolution process, which is generally undesirable. In contrast, the dye should be introduced at a rate consistent with dyeing the textile material as rapidly as possible but also in a level manner.
An alternative embodiment of the dye injection method disclosed by Eggers et al. PCT Publication No. WO 97/14843 involves injection of the dye as a melt incorporated in an inert gas, preferably nitrogen or carbon dioxide (with property of being inert for these two gases being a function of the process conditions). It has been observed by the present applicants that melting of disperse dyes can lead to decreased solubility in SCF—CO
2
. This circumstance indicates that the applicability of this embodiment of the disclosed dye injection method is limited.
Yet another embodiment of the dye introduction method disclosed by Eggers et al. PCT Publication NO. WO 97/14843 involves delivery of the dye into the supercritical fluid flow as a solution or suspension. When a solution is being injected and water-soluble dyes are being used, the recommended injection solvent is water. For water-insoluble dyes, a variety of common nontoxic injection solvents are suggested, with acetone, which readily dissolves disperse dyes, being foremost. The water-insoluble dyes are injected as a solution or suspension in the chosen solvent. In the case that a suitable nontoxic solvent cannot be found or the required amount of solvent is so great that it adversely affects the dyeing process, injection of a dispersion, preferably an aqueous dispersion, is recommended.
This embodiment of the method disclosed by Eggers et al. PCT Publication No. WO 97/14843 also suffers from several drawbacks. Firstly, water is an ant
Butcher Donald L.
Hendrix Walter A.
Montero Gerardo A.
Smith C. Brent
Einsmann Margaret
North Carolina State University
LandOfFree
Method for introducing dyes and other chemicals into a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for introducing dyes and other chemicals into a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for introducing dyes and other chemicals into a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3052892