Method for improving cognition and motor timing

Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Eye or testing by visual stimulus

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C600S544000, C600S545000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08048002

ABSTRACT:
A method of training a subject to improve anticipatory timing includes presenting the subject with multiple sequences of stimuli, receiving sensor signals associated with responses by the subject to the stimuli, and recording response times in accordance with the sensor signals, wherein the recorded response times are associated with the responses by the subject to the multiple sequences of stimuli, and wherein the response times have an associated distribution. The method further includes analyzing the distribution of response times for the subject to determine variability in anticipatory timing of the subject with respect to the stimuli, and generating a subject feedback signal corresponding to a result of the analyzing so as to train the subject to improve anticipatory timing of the subject.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4332566 (1982-06-01), Mazeski et al.
patent: 4407299 (1983-10-01), Culver
patent: 4838681 (1989-06-01), Pavlidis
patent: 4889422 (1989-12-01), Pavlidis
patent: 5137027 (1992-08-01), Rosenfeld
patent: 5331969 (1994-07-01), Silberstein
patent: 5491492 (1996-02-01), Knapp et al.
patent: 5529498 (1996-06-01), Cassily et al.
patent: 5662117 (1997-09-01), Bittman
patent: 5743744 (1998-04-01), Cassily et al.
patent: 5867587 (1999-02-01), Aboutalib et al.
patent: 6090051 (2000-07-01), Marshall
patent: 6102870 (2000-08-01), Edwards
patent: 6162186 (2000-12-01), Scinto et al.
patent: 6542081 (2003-04-01), Torch
patent: 6575902 (2003-06-01), Burton
patent: 6603491 (2003-08-01), Lemelson et al.
patent: 2002/0099305 (2002-07-01), Fukushima et al.
patent: 2003/0225342 (2003-12-01), Hong et al.
patent: 2006/0270945 (2006-11-01), Ghajar
patent: 1726260 (2006-11-01), None
International Search Report, PCT/US2006/032773, Jan. 22, 2007, 5 pages.
Ball et al., “The Role of Higher-Order Motor Areas in Voluntary Movement as Revealed by High-Resolution EEG and fMRI,”NeuroImage, (1999) 10:682-694.
Barnes, et al., “Anticipatory Control of Hand and Eye Movements in Humans During Oculo-Manual Tracking,”J. of Physiology, (2002) 539.1:317-330.
Chan et al., “Are There Sub-types of Attentional Deficits in Patients with Persisting Post-Concussive Symptoms? A Cluster Analytical Study,”Brain Injury(2003) 17(2):131-148.
Gibbon et al., “Toward a Neurobiology of Temporal Cognition: Advances and Challenges,”Current Opinion in Neurobiology, (1997) 7:170-184.
Gredeback, G., et al., “The Development of Two-Dimensional Tracking: A Longitudinal Study of Circular Pursuit,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 163, No. 2, May 2005, pp. 204-213.
Green et al., “Deficits in Facial Emotion Perception in Adults with Recent Traumatic Brain Injury,”Neuropsychologia, (2004) 42:133-141.
Hulsmann et al., “From Will to Action: Sequential Cerebellar Contributions to Voluntary Movement,”NeuroImage, (2003) 20:1485-1492.
Kathmann, N., et al., “Deficits in Gain of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorder Patients and Their Unaffected Relatives,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 160, No. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 696-702.
Lewine et al., “Neuromagnetic Assessment of Pathophysiologic Brain Activity Induced by Minor Head Trauma,”ANJR Am. J. Neuroradiol., (May 1999) 20:857-866.
Lutz et al., “Guiding the Study of Brain Dynamics by Using First-Person Data: Synchrony Patterns Correlate with Ongoing Conscious States During a Simple Visual Task,”PNAS, (Feb. 5, 2002) 99(3):1586-1591.
Madelain et al., “Effects of Learning on Smooth Pursuit During Transient Disappearance of a Visual Target,”J. Neurophysiol., (2003) 90:972-982.
Mangels et al., “Effects of Divided Attention on Episodic Memory in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: A Function of Severity and Strategy,”Neuropsychologia, (2002) 40:2369-2385.
Mehta et al., “Forward Models in Visuomotor Control,”J. Neurophysiol., (2002) 88:942-953.
Pedersen et al., “Origin of Human Motor Readiness Field Linked to Left Middle Frontal Gyrus by MEG and PET,”NeuroImage, (1998) 8:214-220.
Perbal et al., “Relationships Between Time Estimation, Memory, Attention, and Processing Speed in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury,”Neuropsychologia, (2003) 41:1599-1610.
Smith et al., “A Right Hemispheric Frontocerebellar Network for Time Discrimination of Several hundreds of Milliseconds,”NeuroImage, (2003) 20:344-350.
Strauss et al., “Intraindividual Variability in Cognitive Performance in Three Groups of Older Adults: Cross-domain Links to Physical Status and Self-Perceived Affect and Beliefs,”J. of the International Neuropsychol. Soc., (2002) 8:893-906.
European Patent Office Communication for EP 06813639.9 dated May 31, 2011, 11 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/032773 dated Jan. 22, 2007, 14 pgs.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for improving cognition and motor timing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for improving cognition and motor timing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for improving cognition and motor timing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4300045

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.