Method for formation evaluation while drilling

Electricity: measuring and testing – Particle precession resonance – Using well logging device

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C324S300000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06242913

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed to a logging while drilling (LWD) and measuring while drilling (MWD) approach for obtaining nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data concerning petrophysical properties of a formation. More specifically, the invention is directed to a method and device for reducing the sensitivity of NMR measurements to tool motions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
U.S. Pat. No. 5,280,243 to Miller discloses an NMR apparatus and method of use for geophysical examination of a bore hole as it is being drilled. The patented apparatus is connected to the drill bit and follows it through the bore hole as it is being formed. In operation, the apparatus generates a gradient static magnetic field in a region of the bore hole adjacent the apparatus. This static field extends radially with respect to the longitudinal axis of the apparatus and has a generally uniform amplitude along the azimuth with respect to that axis. Next, a pulsed radio frequency magnetic field is generated to excite nuclei in a substantially cylindrical shell around the tool that defines in the formation a sensitive region extending along the length of the tool and having thickness of about 1 mm. Due to this relatively narrow sensitive region, standard wireline NMR relaxation time measurements are difficult to perform with this tool because lateral vibrations during the measurement time would reduce the accuracy of the measurement.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,557,201 to Kleinberg et al. discloses a pulsed NMR device in which the accuracy of the measurement with respect to lateral tool vibrations is enhanced by providing a larger sensitive region. This is achieved by a special tool architecture shown in
FIGS. 2A-B
, using two tubular permanent magnets
22
with same poles facing each other, and an antenna
26
positioned in the recess between the two magnets. In operation, this tool architecture provides a sensitive region in the formation which is larger laterally, but is greatly reduced along the borehole axis, because of the presence of a single stationary point in the formation. It is expected therefore that vertical tool motions would affect the accuracy of the tool measurements.
Accordingly, it is perceived that there is a need for improved sensitivity of pulsed NMR measurements using pulsed NMR tools with respect to tool motions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention concerns a novel method and device for formation evaluation while drilling a borehole using pulsed NMR tools with magnetic fields that are rotationally symmetric about the longitudinal axis of the borehole.
In a preferred embodiment, the method of the present invention is based on NMR relaxation time measurements determining longitudinal relaxation times T
1
. In particular, the method comprises the steps of generating at least one radio frequency pulse covering a relatively wide range of frequencies to saturate the nuclear magnetization in a cylindrical volume around the tool; transmitting a readout pulse at a frequency near the center of the range of covered frequencies, the readout pulse following a predetermined wait time; applying at least one refocusing pulse following the readout pulse; receiving at least one NMR echo corresponding to the readout pulse; repeating the above steps for a different wait time to produce a plurality of data points on a T
1
relaxation curve; and processing the produced T
1
relaxation curve to derive petrophysical properties of the formation.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3508438 (1970-04-01), Alger et al.
patent: 4710713 (1987-12-01), Taicher et al.
patent: 4717876 (1988-01-01), Masi et al.
patent: 4717877 (1988-01-01), Taicher et al.
patent: 4717878 (1988-01-01), Taicher et al.
patent: 4728892 (1988-03-01), Vinegar et al.
patent: 4933638 (1990-06-01), Kenyon et al.
patent: 5023551 (1991-06-01), Kleinberg et al.
patent: 5212447 (1993-05-01), Paltiel
patent: 5280243 (1994-01-01), Miller
patent: 5309098 (1994-05-01), Coates et al.
patent: 5349184 (1994-09-01), Wraight
patent: 5350925 (1994-09-01), Watson
patent: 5363041 (1994-11-01), Sezginer
patent: 5376884 (1994-12-01), Sezginer
patent: 5379216 (1995-01-01), Head
patent: 5381092 (1995-01-01), Freedman
patent: 5387865 (1995-02-01), Jerosch-Herold et al.
patent: 5412320 (1995-05-01), Coates
patent: 5432446 (1995-07-01), Macinnis et al.
patent: 5486761 (1996-01-01), Sezginer
patent: 5486762 (1996-01-01), Freedman et al.
patent: 5497087 (1996-03-01), Vinegar et al.
patent: 5498960 (1996-03-01), Vinegar et al.
patent: 5517115 (1996-05-01), Prammer
patent: 5557200 (1996-09-01), Coates
patent: 5557201 (1996-09-01), Kleinberg et al.
patent: 5565775 (1996-10-01), Stallmach et al.
patent: 5680043 (1997-10-01), Hurlimann et al.
patent: 5796252 (1998-08-01), Kleinberg et al.
patent: 5936405 (1999-08-01), Prammer et al.
patent: 6051973 (2000-04-01), Prammer
patent: 0 581 666 A3 (1994-02-01), None
patent: 0 649 035 B1 (1995-04-01), None
International Publication Number WO 98/25164, Publication Date Jun. 11, 1998; from International Application Number PCT/US97/21889, Filed Nov. 26, 1997; Priority Data: Serial No. 08/759,829, Filed Dec. 4, 1996.
Morriss et al., “Hydrocarbon Saturation and Viscosity Estimation from NMR Logging in the Belridge Diatomite,” 35th SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium (Jun. 19-22, 1994), pp. 1-24.
Carr et al., “Effects of Diffusion on Free Precision in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments,”Physical Review,vol. 94, No. 3 (May 1, 1954), pp. 630-638.
Schlumberger Wireline & Testing, “Combinable Magnetic Resonance tool reliably indicates water-free production and reveals hard-to-find pay zones,” (Jun. 1995).
Morriss et al., “Field Test of an Experimental Pulsed Nuclear Magnetism Tool,” SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium (Jun. 13-16, 1993), pp. 1-23.
Coates et al., “Core Data and the MRIL Show—A New Approach to 'Formation Factor,” National SPWLA Convention (Jun. 15, 1992), pp. 1-15.
Kleinberg et al., “Novel NMR Apparatus for Investigating an External Sample,”Journal of Magnetic Resonance,(1992) pp. 466-485.
Coates et al., “An Investigation of a New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Log,” National SPWLA Convention (Jun. 18, 1991), pp. 1-24.
Howard et al., “Proton Magnetic Resonance and Pore-Size Variations in Reservoir Sandstones,”Society of Petroleum Engineers(1990), pp. 733-741.
Miller et al., “Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Logging: Porosity and Free Fluid Index Determination,”Society of Petroleum Engineers(1990), pp. 321-334.
Kenyon et al., “Pore-Size Distribution and NMR in Microporous Cherty Sandstones,” SPWLA Thirtieth Annual Logging Symposium (Jun. 11-14, 1989), pp. 1-24.
Schlumberger Technology News—Oilfield Bulletin, “Fifth Generation Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging Tool:A Major Advance in Producibility Measurement Technology,” (Jul. 1995) (2 pp.).
Akkurt et al., “NMR Logging of Natural Gas Reservoirs,” SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium (Jun. 26-29, 1995).
Prammer, M.G., “NMR Pore Size Distributions and Permeability at the Well Site,”Society of Petroleum Engineers(Sep. 25, 1995) pp. 55-64.
Chandler et al., “Improved Log Quality with a Dual-Frequency Pulsed NMR Tool,”Society of Petroleum Engineers(1994) pp. 23-35.
Straley et al., “NMR in Partially Saturated Rocks: Laboratory Insights on Free Fluid Index and Comparison with Borehole Logs,” SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium (Jun. 27, 1991) pp. 40-56.
Jackson et al., “Western Gas Sands Project Los Alamos NMR Well Logging Tool Development,” Los Alamos National Laboratory (Oct. 1981—Sep. 1982) pp. 1-28.
Clavier et al., “The Theoretical and Experimental Bases for the ‘Dual Water’ Model for the Interpretation of Shaly Sands,”Journal of Petroleum Technology(Apr. 1984), pp. 3-15.
Waxman et al., “Electrical Conductivities in Oil-Bearing Shaly Sands,”Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal(1968) pp. 107-122.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for formation evaluation while drilling does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for formation evaluation while drilling, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for formation evaluation while drilling will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2505040

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.