Mineral oils: processes and products – Chemical conversion of hydrocarbons – Cracking
Patent
1998-05-12
1999-12-07
Griffin, Walter D.
Mineral oils: processes and products
Chemical conversion of hydrocarbons
Cracking
20812001, 208125, 208126, 208127, 585653, 422139, 422140, 422141, 422144, 422142, 422145, 422147, C10G 1100
Patent
active
059977264
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention concerns a process and device for catalytic cracking of a hydrocarbon charge in a descending bed, utilizing an improved contact zone between the charge and the catalyst.
It is known that, in the petroleum industry, "Fluid Catalytic Cracking", or "FCC," has come to occupy an increasingly important place in refining, since it allows the composition of crude oils to be adjusted to respond to the demand of the refined products market.
In these processes, the charge is cracked in the gas phase in the absence of hydrogen. The reaction temperature is about 500.degree. C. and pressure generally approaches atmospheric pressure. During the cracking reaction, the catalyst becomes covered with coke and traces of heavy hydrocarbons, and the heat generated from the combustion of this coke during the regeneration operation in the presence of air or oxygen makes it possible to heat the catalyst to the desired temperature in order to supply the necessary calories to the cracking reaction after the catalyst has been reinjected into the reactor.
These FCC processes are habitually carried out in ascending flux reactors, thus giving the English-derived term of "riser reactor." However, this method of operation poses a number of problems: the catalyst particles in the fluidized bed exist in an unstable equilibrium, since they tend, first, to rise because of the ascent of the gases which ensure fluidized bed sintering and vaporization of the charge, and second, to fall because of the weight thereof.
As a result, the C/O ratio between the catalyst flow rate C and the flow rate O of the charge to be processed is limited to a maximum value normally of between 3 and 7 in current reactors, and usually of about 5.
Furthermore, in ascending flux reactors particles accumulate near the reactor walls, thus producing an excess cracking of the hydrocarbons in these locations, a phenomenon which forms coke, hydrogen, methane, and ethane instead of the products having the desired high octane number, while, in the center of the reactor, where fewer particles are found, insufficient conversion of the charge occurs.
Finally, while, overall, the catalyst grains rise in the reactor, some of them may fall back in certain places in proximity to the wall, because of the accumulation phenomenon explained above. This occurrence, known in English as "back-mixing," also leads to a localized reduction of conversion, since the grains which fall back are partially deactivated and produce less effect on the charge than the grains which rise. This phenomenon is especially troublesome because the aforementioned C/O ratio drops.
In order to remedy the problems posed by the riser, it was long ago suggested that reactors exhibiting downward catalyst flow, or "downers" be used (see, in this regard, U.S. Pat. No. 2,420,558).
In fact, it is known that the basic difference between these two types of reactors lies in the fact that the relative positions of the catalyst and of the charge remain substantially the same along the entirety of the downer, since the vapor and solid phases are placed in motion by the effect of gravity.
Accordingly, there is an absence of back-mixing, the radial homogeneity of the catalyst in the reactor is preserved, and the flow in this reactor is of the piston type. This makes it possible to impart good selectivity to the cracking reaction.
Furthermore, reaction times can apparently be reduced substantially as compared with the riser and may be substantially shorter than 1 second, and it appears possible to increase freely the flow rate of the catalyst with no adverse effect on particle movement, as is the case in a riser.
However, the use of a downer poses many difficulties, with the result that no one has as yet truly risked conversion from an ascending to a descending flow on an industrial scale.
Indeed, while the downer is supposed to allow very short reaction times, it is technically very difficult to produce the mixture and achieve vaporization and separation of the hydrocarbons from
REFERENCES:
patent: 5660716 (1997-08-01), Bourgogne et al.
Del Pozo Mariano
Fersing Marc
Gauthier Thierry
Griffin Walter D.
Preisch Nadine
Total Raffinage Distribution , S.A.
LandOfFree
Method for fluid catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon feedstock does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for fluid catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon feedstock, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for fluid catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon feedstock will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-819922