Method for evaluation of energy utilities

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S014270, C705S014270

Reexamination Certificate

active

06988092

ABSTRACT:
A computer implemented method uses a database of detailed, comprehensive utility operating and financial information. The method comprises: (1) feature based matching or similarity based benchmark and focus group selection; (2) a performance assessment procedure comprising multi-perspective analysis; and (3) multi-attribute business profiling and performance improvement potential analysis. As part of the performance assessment step, data corresponding to different utilities in a selected benchmark group are compared with each other to find their strengths and weaknesses. Interpretation of these gaps provides the cause of such gaps. Composite ranking analysis is used so that a composite score of at least one utility business is obtained.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5819066 (1998-10-01), Bromberg et al.
patent: 5991741 (1999-11-01), Speakman et al.
patent: 6088676 (2000-07-01), White, Jr.
patent: 2003/0158749 (2003-08-01), Olchanski et al.
Charnes et al, Comparison of DEA and Existing Ratio and Regression Systems for Effecting Efficiency Evaluations of Regulate Electric Cooperatives in Texas, Research in Government And Nonprofit Accounting, vol. 5, pp. 187-210, Copyright 1989.
Charnes, A. et al., “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,”European Journal of Operations Research, 1978, 2, 429-444.
Farell, M. J., “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1957, Series A, 120(3), 253-281.
Dyson, R. G., “Data Envelopment Analysis,” Ali Emrouznejad's DEA HomePage, (www.warwick.ac.uk/˜bsrlu/dea/deat/deat.htm), 1 page, 1995.
Trick, M., “Data Envelopment Analysis for Consultants,” (www.mat.gsia.cmu.edu/mstc/dea/dea.html), 2 pages, 1996.
Beasley, J. E., “Data Envelopment Analysis,”OR-Notes, (www.mscmga.ms.ic.ac.uk/jeb/or/dea.html), 14 pages.
Coelli, T., “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program,” University of New England, Armindale, NSW, Australia (www.une.edu.au/econometrics/cepanews.htm), 2 pages.
Färe, R. et al., “The Relative Efficiency of Illinois Electric Utilities,”Resources and Energy, 1983, 5, 349-367.
Charnes, A. et al., “Comparisons of DEA and Existing Ratio and Regression Systems for Effecting Efficiency Evaluations of Regulated Electric Cooperatives in Texas,”Research in Government and Nonprofit Accounting, 1989, 5, 187-210.
Miliotis, P. A., “Data Envelopment Analysis Applied to Electricity Distribution Districts,”Journal of Operational Research Society, 1992, 43(5), 549-555.
Bagdadioglu, N. et al., “Efficiency and Ownership in Electricity Distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience,”Energy Economics, 1996, 18, 1-23.
Førsund, F. R. et al., “Productivity development of Norwegian electricity distribution utilities,”Resource anbd Energy Economics, 1998, 20, 207-224.
Hjalmarsson, L. et al., “Productivity in Swedish Electricity Retail Distribution,”Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1992, 94 (Supplement), S193-S205.
Kittelsen, S. A. C., “Using DEA to Regulate Norwegian Electricity Distribution Utilities,”Presentation at the Sixth European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Copenhagen, Denmark, Oct. 29-31, 1999, 10 pages.
Agrell, P. J. et al., “Efficiency and Incentives in Regulated Industries: The Case of Electricity Distribution in Scandinavia,”Presentation at the Sixth European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Copenhagen, Denmark, Oct. 29-31, 1999, 1-31.
“Choice of model and availability of data for the efficiency analysis of Dutch network and supply businesses in the electricity sector,”Netherlands Electricity Regulatory Service, Feb. 2000, 46 pages.
“Efficiency and benchmarking study of the NSW distribution businesses,”Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales, Feb. 1999, 105 pages.
Review of Public Electricity Suppliers 1998-2000, Distribution Price Control Review: Consultation Paper,Office of Electricity Regulation(OFFER), Birmingham, UK, May 1999.
UMS group Inc. HomePage (www.umsgroup.com).
DATAMONITOR Home Page (www.datamonitor.com).
POWERdat, Resource Data International, Boulder, CO, 1997.
Utility DATAPACK, Utility Data Institute, Fairfield, CT, 1997.
Cooper, W. W. et al.,Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000.
Norman, M. et al.,Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1991.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for evaluation of energy utilities does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for evaluation of energy utilities, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for evaluation of energy utilities will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3563410

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.