Method for dynamically computing a switching schedule

Multiplex communications – Data flow congestion prevention or control

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07496033

ABSTRACT:
Methods and systems for dynamically computing a schedule defining interconnections between ports in a switching system. In one embodiment, a switching core requests demand reports from the ingress ports. In response to this request, the ingress ports generate a series of suggested port schedules, beginning with a first choice, then a second choice, and so on. The schedules are transmitted to the switching core, beginning with the first choice. The switching core receives the first choice for each of the ports and determines whether the aggregate schedule defined by the first choices is valid. If the aggregate schedule is valid, then this schedule is implemented. If the aggregate schedule is not valid, portions of it are discarded and the next choice from each of the ports is examined to identify connections to replace the discarded portions. This process is repeated until a valid schedule is obtained.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5416769 (1995-05-01), Karol
patent: 5469284 (1995-11-01), Haas
patent: 5486943 (1996-01-01), Sasayama et al.
patent: 5734486 (1998-03-01), Guillemot et al.
patent: 5737106 (1998-04-01), Sansonetti et al.
patent: 6160812 (2000-12-01), Bauman et al.
patent: 6304552 (2001-10-01), Chapman et al.
patent: 6345040 (2002-02-01), Stephens et al.
patent: 6477169 (2002-11-01), Angle et al.
patent: 6658579 (2003-12-01), Bell et al.
patent: 6665495 (2003-12-01), Miles et al.
patent: 6747971 (2004-06-01), Hughes et al.
patent: 7023840 (2006-04-01), Golla et al.
patent: 7023841 (2006-04-01), Dell et al.
patent: 7106697 (2006-09-01), Best et al.
patent: 7110358 (2006-09-01), Clinton et al.
patent: 7184444 (2007-02-01), Posey, Jr.
patent: 2002/0029238 (2002-03-01), Okuhata
patent: 2003/0026287 (2003-02-01), Mullendore et al.
patent: 2003/0067653 (2003-04-01), Aicklen et al.
patent: 2005/0276263 (2005-12-01), Suetsugu et al.
patent: 2006/0239288 (2006-10-01), Posey, Jr.
G. Depovere, et. al., Philips Research Laboratories, “A Flexible Cross-Connect Network Using Multiple Object Carriers” all pages, unknown.
John M. Senior, et al., SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, “All-Optical Networking 1999: Architecture, Control, and Management Issues” vol. 3843, pp. 111-119, Sep. 19-21, 1999.
Jonathan S. Turner, Journal of High Speed Networks 8 (1999) 3-16 IOS Press, “Terabit Burst Switching”, pp. 3-16.
Ken-ichi Sato, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, No. 1, Jan. 1994 “Network Performance and Integrity Enhancement with Optical Path Layer Technologies”, pp. 159-170.
F. Callegati, et al., Optical Fiber Technology 4, 1998 “Architecture and Performance of a Broadcast and Select Photonic Switch*”, pp. 266-284.
Soeren Lykke Danielsen, et al., “WDM Packet Switch Architectures and Analysis of the Influence of Tuneable Wavelength Converters on the Performance”, Jun. 1998.
Soeren L. Danielsen, et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 10, No. 6, “Optical Packet Switched Network Layer Without Optical Buffers”, unknown.
John M. Senior, et al., SPIE—The International Society of Optical Engineering,All-Optical Networking: Architecture, Control and Management Issuesvol. 3531, pp. 455-464, Nov. 3-5, 1998.
M.C. Chia, et al., Part of SPIE Conference on All-Optical Networking: Architecture, Control and Management Issues, “Performance of Feedback and Feedforward Arrayed—Waveguide Gratings-Based Optical Packet Switches with WDM Inputs/Outputs”, Nov. 1998.
Wu et al, Simulation-based test algorithm generation and port scheduling for multi-port memories, AMC Press, Proceedings of the 38thconference on Design automation, pp. 301-306, Jun. 2001.
Mattson et al, Communication Scheduling, AMC Press, ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems ASPLOS-IX, vol. 28, 34 issue 5, 5, pp. 82-92, Nov. 2000.
McKeown et al., Designing and Implementing a Fast Crossbar Scheduler, IEEE, pp. 20-28, 1999.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for dynamically computing a switching schedule does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for dynamically computing a switching schedule, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for dynamically computing a switching schedule will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4120205

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.