Internal-combustion engines – Poppet valve operating mechanism – Electrical system
Reexamination Certificate
2001-01-29
2002-01-22
Lo, Weilun (Department: 3748)
Internal-combustion engines
Poppet valve operating mechanism
Electrical system
C251S129010, C251S129150
Reexamination Certificate
active
06340008
ABSTRACT:
An electromagnetic actuator for actuating a cylinder valve in a piston-type internal-combustion engine essentially comprises two spaced electromagnets, whose pole faces face one another, and between which an armature that acts on the cylinder valve to be actuated is guided to move back and forth, counter to the force of at least one restoring spring, between an open position and a closed position for the cylinder valve. One of the electromagnets serves as a closing magnet, by means of which the cylinder valve is held in the closed position, counter to the force of the opening spring, while the other electromagnet serves as an opening magnet, by means of which the cylinder valve is held in the open position by way of the armature, counter to the force of the associated closing spring.
The arrangement is such that, in the resting position, the armature assumes a center position between the two pole faces. When the two electromagnets are alternately supplied with current, the armature comes into contact with the pole face of the respective supplied, and therefore capturing, electromagnet, counter to the force of a restoring spring. If the retaining current to the retaining electromagnet is turned off, the force of the restoring spring accelerates the armature in the direction of the other electromagnet, which is acted upon with a correspondingly high capturing current during the armature movement, so after overshooting the center position, the armature comes into contact due to the magnetic force, counter to the force of the restoring spring associated with the respective capturing electromagnet.
The electromagnetic actuator is controlled as a function of the operating data of the piston-type internal-combustion engine, essentially the load requirement and the rpm, which are available to the engine control unit. If the cylinder valve is, for example, in its closed position, i.e., the armature rests against the closing magnet, the control is a function of time - in other words, the engine control unit effects the control with consideration of the crankshaft position and the parameters from the load specification, which respectively determine the opening and closing times for the cylinder valve. The turn-off of the relatively low retaining current initiates the beginning of the armature movement, so the capturing current to the capturing electromagnet can be turned on after a predeterminable delay following the turn-off of the retaining current to the capturing electromagnet. The delay can be determined by way of previous empirical data, or theoretical data.
The time of the turn-off of the retaining current must be determined precisely, but is not identical to the time of the beginning of the armature movement, because the electromagnetic processes, such as the slow breakdown of the retaining magnetic field, and external influences, such as gas counterpressure counter to the cylinder valve to be opened, frictional resistances, etc., result in a so-called “sticking time” for the armature. The actual armature movement therefore does not begin until after a specific delay following the turn-off of the retaining current.
If the capturing current is now initiated, as the armature continues to approach the pole face of the capturing electromagnet with a constant current supply, the magnetic force increases progressively, whereas the force of the restoring spring acting in the opposite direction only increases linearly. Consequently, the armature accelerates increasingly in the end phase, shortly before impacting the pole face of the capturing electromagnet, so the armature impacts the pole face hard, which is undesirable for several reasons: It produces physical or airborne sound and consequently promotes the development of noise. To avoid this, an appropriate control of the capturing current is aimed at reducing the current shortly before the armature impacts the pole face of the respective capturing electromagnet; a sensor element is used to detect the armature approach. This can be effected in that, when a predetermined armature position in the vicinity of the pole face is reached, a corresponding control signal is emitted, or the armature movement in this region is detected. The engine control unit, or a separate current control for the actuator, can use these approach values for the actuator for reducing the capturing current such that the armature impacts the pole face gently, i.e., at a speed only slightly greater than “zero,” so the impacting electromagnet is only acted upon by the low retaining current.
These known control means are, however, inflexible, and do not take into account the numerous external interfering forces that act on the system comprising the armature and the cylinder valve, on the one hand, and on the other hand, they do not sufficiently minimize the development of noise.
It is the object of the invention to create a method that permits a much more precise control of an electromagnetic actuator.
In accordance with the invention, this object is accomplished by a method for controlling an electromagnetic actuator for actuating a cylinder valve in a piston-type internal-combustion engine, having two spaced electromagnets, between which an armature acting on the cylinder valve is guided to move back and forth between the pole faces of the two electromagnets, counter to the force of at least one restoring spring, with the electromagnets being alternately acted upon with a capturing current by way of a control, and with a sensor element detecting the movement of the armature on its path from the one pole face to the other pole face, specifically such that, in a first phase beginning with the initiation of the detachment of the armature from the pole face of the retaining electromagnet, the sensor element detects the actual values of the armature movement; in a second phase, as a function of the detected actual values of the armature movement, the control actuates the capturing electromagnet with regard to the current supply such that the armature is moved, at a predetermined speed and an acceleration approaching “zero,” in a predeterminable spacing range from the pole face of the capturing magnet; and in a third phase, the current supply to the capturing electromagnet is controlled such that the armature impacts the pole face at a predeterminable minimum speed. The “initiation of the detachment of the armature” is defined by the time of the turn-off, preferably the purposeful reduction, of the retaining current. The term “actual values of the armature movement” encompasses not only the time of the turn-off of the retaining current in the first phase, but also the respective position, speed and acceleration of the armature in at least the first and second phases. Depending on the nature of the sensor element, in addition to the armature position, the armature speed can be detected directly, or, like the acceleration, derived from the path derivation over time, which results from the detection of position.
The division of the armature movement into three phases takes into account the physical qualities of the actuator, namely its individual mechanical qualities and the qualities that change over the course of operation of the piston-type internal-combustion engine. In the first phase, the armature movement is only “observed,” during which the energetic initial position of the armature movement is detected, the position being essentially predetermined by the actual time of the detachment from the pole face and by the force of the restoring spring that accelerates the armature, as well as by the counteracting frictional forces and gas-pressure forces. When the armature is detached, unavoidable energy losses in the mechanical system occur in the vicinity of the electromagnet due to the residual field acting in the opposite direction. These negative electromagnetic force influences can be minimized through the use of a low-eddy-current armature and/or the supply of a current of a different polarity, which generates a magnetic field that has a repelling effect on the arma
Boie Christian
Corde Gilles
Kather Lutz
Kemper Hans
FEV Motorentechnik GmbH
Kelemen Gabor J.
Lo Weilun
LandOfFree
Method for controlling an electromagnetic actuator for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for controlling an electromagnetic actuator for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for controlling an electromagnetic actuator for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2833963