Harvesters – Motorized harvester – With condition-responsive operation
Reexamination Certificate
2000-07-07
2002-01-22
Pezzuto, Robert E. (Department: 3671)
Harvesters
Motorized harvester
With condition-responsive operation
Reexamination Certificate
active
06339916
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates in general to electrically powered mowers and relates more particularly to such a mower with the ability to maintain a constant speed on inclines and declines.
2. Background of the Invention
Mowing golf courses requires a precise mower designed is and engineered to ensure a closely cropped and consistently cut green. In addition, because of the time required to grow a mature green and the cost associated with starting and maintaining a golf course, it is extremely important that the greens mower operate properly and not damage the green.
Golf course greens maintenance equipment traditionally has utilized internal combustion engines. A number of greens mowers are known in the art. Some are discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,429,110, and 4,021,996. Riding greens mowers with multiple or gang cutting units are the subject of U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,511,033, 3,668,844, 4,866,917, and 5,042,236. The mowers discussed in these patents all rely on an internal combustion engine as a source of power, and a complex drive mechanism or hydrostatic system for supplying power to the ground engaging wheels and the reel mowing units. However, there are a number of problems associated with the use of a golf course vehicle incorporating an internal combustion engine. First, fuel or hydraulic fluid can leak from the vehicle onto the green and damage the grass. Furthermore, it is inconvenient to service internal combustion engines, and it is inconvenient and hazardous to obtain and store the necessary fuel. Finally, internal combustion engines are a source of both noise and air pollution, and many U.S. cities have recently enacted noise and air pollution prevention statutes that severely limit the time of day and the duration that internal combustion golf course vehicles may be operated.
Taking into consideration the above noted risks and concerns associated with internal combustion engines, battery-powered mowers have become a viable alternative to conventional internal combustion powered greens mowers. Historically, most electric vehicles have utilized series motor designs because of their ability to produce very high levels of torque at low speeds. The current electric greens mowers, however, have a distinct disadvantage relative to internal combustion engine mowers: since they operate by electric motor, their speed varies is on inclines and declines that are greater than about 5 degrees. Such a variation in speed is undesirable because the cutting reels are typically operating at a constant speed. A reel mower is designed to have a certain frequency of clip, wherein a reel blade passes across the bedknife at a certain rate as the machine moves forward. For example, if the height of cut is 0.250 inches, a reel blade will pass the bedknife every 0.250 inches of forward travel. Therefore, since riding Greens Mowers typically have fixed reel speed, any increase in ground speed will cause the machine to move forward farther than what is optimal and cause an uneven, wavy cut that is called marcelling.
Two of the main goals of any type of riding greens mower, whether electrically powered or otherwise, are maintaining the desired cutting height and sustaining an even quality of cut provided by the reels. The ability of the cutting reels to maintain the desired quality of cut depends upon the consistency of the ground speed of the mower. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that variations in terrain and turf conditions affect the ground speed and the quality of cut of an electric greens mower such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,406,777.
Internal combustion or hydraulically powered greens mowers incorporate dynamic braking to ensure that the mower maintains a constant ground speed. Dynamic braking is a technique in which retarding force is supplied by the same device that originally was the driving motor. Such braking occurs in an hydraulic system when the operator releases the acceleration pedal. The hydraulic circuit builds pressure internally, creating the braking action, and the motor turns relative to the speed of the hydraulic pump and not faster. The engine, therefore, acts as a brake.
In an electrically powered greens mower, however, dynamic braking, as previously described, is not possible. Rather, when the operator releases the pedal, the voltage applied to the motor drops and the motor enters into a free wheel mode, where the revolution of the electric motor is not inhibited as in the hydraulic motor. As long as the electric mower is coasting on a decline, the electric motor will continue to increase speed. When the mower reaches level ground or an incline, the electric motor will begin to slow gradually until it stops, thus stopping the mower. When operating a mower using this sort of electric motor, the operator must constantly monitor and adjust the ond speed. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the varying speed of the mower is a detraction from using the electrically powered greens maintenance devices of the prior art since the relationship between ground speed and reel speed is not always constant, and marcelling will often result.
Accordingly, there is a need for an electric greens mower that includes a constant speed control mechanism that will prevent the electric motor from entering a free wheel mode, minimize marcelling, and improve the quality of the cut provided by the electric mower.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, there is provided an electrically driven degrees mower having a novel traction speed control mechanism.
The present invention provides a traction speed control mechanism for an electrically powered mower to allow the mower to travel at a fixed speed over varying turf conditions. The mechanism includes a separately excited shunt, motor, a feedback loop system from the motor, and a controller to electrically adjust the field and armature current to regulate the speed of the mower. This feature allows the mower to run at a near constant speed and to provide a high quality cut, and it does not require the operator to manually regulate the speed.
These and other advantages and features which characterize the present invention are pointed out with particularity in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, the drawings and the claims.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1401156 (1921-12-01), Jenkins
patent: 2057417 (1936-10-01), Clapper
patent: 2192468 (1940-03-01), Gore
patent: 2417613 (1947-03-01), Radabaugh
patent: 2567065 (1951-09-01), Ginsterblum
patent: 2586273 (1952-02-01), Steven
patent: 2597735 (1952-05-01), Jepson
patent: 2792898 (1957-05-01), Mast
patent: 2959174 (1960-11-01), Anderson
patent: 3003586 (1961-10-01), Loef et al.
patent: 3027961 (1962-04-01), Rogant
patent: 3061031 (1962-10-01), Packard
patent: 3090184 (1963-05-01), Hadek
patent: 3103090 (1963-09-01), Campbell
patent: 3103909 (1963-09-01), Campbell
patent: 3106811 (1963-10-01), Heth et al.
patent: 3169358 (1965-02-01), Ertsgaard et al.
patent: 3212244 (1965-10-01), Wilgus
patent: 3217824 (1965-11-01), Jepson
patent: 3229452 (1966-01-01), Hasenbank
patent: 3230695 (1966-01-01), West
patent: 3339353 (1967-09-01), Schreyer
patent: 3404516 (1968-10-01), Carlson
patent: 3404518 (1968-10-01), Kasper
patent: 3410063 (1968-11-01), Speiser
patent: 3425197 (1969-02-01), Kita
patent: 3429110 (1969-02-01), Strasel
patent: 3472005 (1969-10-01), Profenna
patent: 3496706 (1970-02-01), Mattson
patent: 3511033 (1970-05-01), Strasel
patent: 3511034 (1970-05-01), Strasel
patent: 3511035 (1970-05-01), Strasel
patent: 3516233 (1970-06-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 3550714 (1970-12-01), Bellinger
patent: 3563011 (1971-02-01), Ramley et al.
patent: 3563012 (1971-02-01), Strasel
patent: 3570226 (1971-03-01), Haverkamp et al.
patent: 3570227 (1971-03-01), Bellinger
patent: 3572455 (1971-03-01), Brueske
patent: 3581480 (1971-06-01), O'Conner et al.
patent: 3602772 (1971-08-01), Hundhausen et al.
patent: 3603065 (1971-09-01), Weber
patent: 3608284 (1971-09-01), Erdman
patent: 3608285 (1971-09-01), Berk
patent
Harness Dickey & Pierce PLC
Lafata Joseph M.
Pezzuto Robert E.
Textron Inc.
LandOfFree
Method for constant speed control for electric greens mower does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for constant speed control for electric greens mower, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for constant speed control for electric greens mower will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2865413