Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Maintaining blood or sperm in a physiologically active state...
Reexamination Certificate
2002-07-09
2004-09-21
Lankford, Jr., Leon B. (Department: 1651)
Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
Maintaining blood or sperm in a physiologically active state...
C435S004000, C435S018000, C435S029000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06794125
ABSTRACT:
This invention relates to a method of determining spermatozoa qualities, and is particularly useful for determining the viability and fertilising ability of avian spermatozoa.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
Methods for assesing the quality of spermatozoa from domestic fowl and other animals, and estimations of their value as predictors of sperm fertilizing ability have been established for many decades (Cooper and Rowell, 1958; Wilson et al., 1979).
Earlier tests (Cooper and Rowell, 1958; Wilson et al., 1979) were perceived to be highly subjective, involving operator-dependent ‘scoring’ of a particular sperm parameter, with poor agreement between operators. More recently, this criticism has been answered by the introduction and application of a range of objective tests of chicken sperm quality (Bilgilli and Renden, 1985; Wishart and Palmer 1986; Chaudhuri and Wishart, 1988; Froman and McLean, 1996; Barbato et al., 1997). These tests have additionally shown that sperm quality in individual domestic fowl is a ‘trait’ which is repeatable between ejaculates in the short and longer term and can be linked to fertilizing ability (Wishart and Palmer, 1986; Chaudhuri et al., 1988; Froman et al., 1997; 1998).
A limitation of these objective tests of sperm quality is that they require laboratory facilities such as centrifuges and/or lack the robustness required for use ‘on the farm’. The INT-tetrazolium dye test introduced by Chaudhuri and Wishart (1988) is relatively robust, and its outcome is easily interpreted as the intensity of colour produced by spermatozoa during a short incubation. INT-reduction was also strongly correlated with other tests of sperm ‘quality’, including their fertilizing ability (Chaudhuri et al., 1988). However, reagents involved in the test are unstable and some (e.g. cyanide) are highly toxic. An additional disadvantage is that samples require to be centrifuged before they are sufficiently optically clear to be read with a colorimeter. These problems have limited the practical applicability of the INT-reduction assay.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method of assessing sperm quality comprising determining whether (and optionally, to what extent) the sperm being assessed can reduce a tetrazolium dye, wherein the dye reduction is determined by monitoring colour changes at a pH above 4.0.
The tetrazolium dye is preferably MTT, which can be added to the sperm in the reaction mixture, or vice versa.
The reaction between the sperm and the dye is preferably carried out for about 1 hr at 37-40° C., and preferably at near neutral pH such as pH 6-8, e.g. pH 7.4.
The method preferably includes the step of adding a solubilizing agent such as a detergent such as SDS, or some other agent capable of solubilizing the sperm cells. Solubilizing the sperm cells or otherwise releasing their contents enables colorimetric assessment of the extent of reduction of the tetrazolium dye without centrifugation of the reaction mixture. The solubilizing agent conveniently also stops the reaction.
The colorimetric assessment of dye reduction is preferably carried out as a separate step in slightly more acidic conditions than the reaction of the dye with the sperm, such as pH 5-7 and in an especially preferred embodiment the colorimetric assessment of the dye reduction is carried out at around pH 6.
In a preferred embodiment the invention provides an assay comprising exposing spermatozoa to a tetrazolium dye (preferably MTT), solubilizing the spermatozoa to release their contents into the reaction mixture, and measuring the colour change in the reaction mixture as a result of the reduction of the tetrazolium dye, wherein at least some of the steps are carried out at a pH above pH 4.0, and typically at around pH 6.0.
The results of the colorimetric measurement of the dye reduction can be quantified against a standard of known sperm quality assayed by other means.
The sperm quality assessed is typically viability, but indicators of fertilizing ability and other characteristics of the sperm may be obtained from the colourimetric assessment of the dye reduction.
The sperm is typically avian sperm, but the method is suitable for use on other types of sperm, e.g. mammalian sperm.
Certain embodiments of the invention avoid the need for unstable and toxic reagents such as cyanide and/or the requirement for laboratory facilities like centrifuges. The addition of a reagent such as SDS clears the sperm suspension sufficiently for direct reading of the optical density of the colour produced, thereby enabling a test that can be performed on farm premises without laboratory facilities.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5434057 (1995-07-01), Dorian
G.J. Wishart and L.K. Wood, “Evaluation of Tetrazolium Reduction Assays For Assessing Poultry Sperm Metabolism and Predicting Fertilizing Ability,” World Poultry Science Assoc., vol. I, pp 310-311 , (1994).
D.M. Cooper, J.G. Rowell, “Relations Between Fertility, Embryonic Survival and Some Semen Characteristics in the Chicken,” Poultry Science, 37, pp 699-707 (1958).
G.F. Barbato, P.G. Cramer, R. H. Hammerstedt, “A Practical In Vitro Sperm-Egg Binding Assay That Detects Subfertile Males,” Biology of Reproduction, 58(3):686-99 (1998).
S.F. Bilgili, J.A. Renden, K.J. Sexton, “Fluorometry of Poultry Semen: Its Application in the Determination of Viability, Enzyme Leakage, and Fertility,” Poultry Science 64:1227-1230 (1985).
D. Chaudhuri, G.J. Wishart, P.E. Lake, O. Ravie, “Predicting The Fertilising Ability of Avian Semen: Comparison Of A Simple Colourimetric Test With Other Methods For Predicting The Fertilising Ability of Fowl Semen,” British Poultry Science, 29:847-851 (1988).
D.P. Froman, D.J. McLean, “Objective Measurement of Sperm Motility Based Upon Sperm Penetration of Accudenz,” Poultry Science 75:76-784 (1996).
D.P. Froman, A.J. Feltmann, D.J. McLean, “Increased Fecundity Resulting from Semen Donor Selection Based Upon In Vitro Sperm Motility,” Poultry Science 76:73-77 (1997).
David P. Froman, Allen J. Feltmann, “Sperm Mobility: A Quantitative Trait of the Domestic Fowl (Gallus domesticus),” Biology of Reproduction 58:379-384 (1998).
P.E. Lake, J.M. Stewart, “Artificial Insemination in Poultry,” Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Bulletin 213, pp 30-32 (Appendix A—“The Examination of the Morphology of Spermatozoa of Domestic Fowl”).
C.D. McDaniel, J.L. Hannah, H.M. Parker, T.W. Smith, C.D. Schultz, C.J. Zumwalt, “Use of a Sperm Analyzer for Evaluating Broiler Breeder Males. I. Effects of Altering Sperm Quality and Quantity on the Sperm Motility Index,” Poultry Science 77:888-893 (1998).
Tim Mosmann, “Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays” Journal of Immunological Methods, 65:55-63 (1983).
Dominic A. Scudiero, Robert H. Shoemaker, Kenneth D. Paull, Anne Monks, Siobhan Tierney, Thomas H. Nofziger, Michael J. Currens, Donna Seniff, Michael R. Boyd, “Evaluation of a Soluble Tetrazolium/Formazan Assay for Cell Growth and Drug Sensitivity in Culture Using Human and Other Tumor Cell Lines,” Cancer Research 48:4827-4833 (1988).
L. Robertson, Y.I. Wilson, C. Lindsay and G.J. Wishart, “Evaluation of Semen From Individual Male Domestic Fowl by Assessment of Sperm: Perivitelline Interaction in vitro and in vivo,” British Poultry Science 39:278-281 (1998).
H.R. Wilson, N.P. Piesco, E.R. Miller, W.G. Nesbeth, “Prediction of the Fertility Potential of Broiler Breeder Males,” World Poultry Science Journal, vol. 35:91-118 (1979).
G.J. Wishart, “Maintenance of ATP Concentrations in and of Fertilizing Ability of Fowl and and Turkey Spermatozoa in vitro,” Journal of Reproduction & Fertility Ltd., 66:457-462 (1982).
G.J. Wishart, “Quantitation of the Fertilising Ability of Fresh Compared With Frozen and Thawed Fowl Spermatozoa,” British Poultry Science 26:375-380 (1985).
G.J. Wishart, “Physiological Changes in Fowl and Turkey Spermatozoa During in vitro Storage,” British Poultry Science 30:443-454 (1989).
Graham J. Wishart, “Techniques for Semen Quality Determination,” Thi
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Lankford , Jr. Leon B.
University of Abertay Dundee
LandOfFree
Method for assessing fowl sperm quality does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for assessing fowl sperm quality, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for assessing fowl sperm quality will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3249545