Electrolysis: processes – compositions used therein – and methods – Electrolytic coating – Involving measuring – analyzing – or testing
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-01
2003-06-03
King, Roy (Department: 1742)
Electrolysis: processes, compositions used therein, and methods
Electrolytic coating
Involving measuring, analyzing, or testing
C205S101000, C205S296000, C205S775000, C205S780500, C205S786500, C205S787000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06572753
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention is concerned with analysis of organic additives in plating baths as a means of providing control over the deposit properties.
2. Description of the Related Art
Electroplating baths typically contain organic additives whose concentrations must be closely controlled in the low parts per million range in order to attain the desired deposit properties and morphology. One of the key functions of such additives is to level or brighten the deposit by suppressing the electrodeposition rate at peaks in the substrate surface. Leveling/brightening of the deposit results from faster metal deposition within recessed areas where the additive, which is present at low concentration, is less effectively replenished by diffusion/bath agitation as it is consumed in the electrodeposition process. The most sensitive methods available for detecting leveling and brightening additives in plating baths involve electrochemical measurement of the metal electrodeposition rate under controlled hydrodynamic conditions for which the additive concentration in the vicinity of the electrode surface is well-defined.
Cyclic voltammetric stripping (CVS) analysis [D. Tench and C. Ogden, J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 194 (1978)] is the most widely used bath additive control method and involves cycling the potential of an inert electrode (e.g., Pt) in the plating bath between fixed potential limits so that metal is alternately plated on and stripped from the electrode surface. Such voltage cycling is designed to establish a steady state for the electrode surface so that reproducible results are obtained. Cyclic pulse voltammetric stripping (CPVS), also called cyclic step voltammetric stripping (CSVS), is a variation of the CVS method that employs discrete changes in voltage during the analysis to condition the electrode so as to improve the measurement precision [D. Tench and J. White, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 831 (1985)]. A rotating disk electrode configuration is typically employed for both CVS and CPVS analysis to provide controlled hydrodynamic conditions. Accumulation of organic films or other contaminants on the electrode surface can be avoided by periodically voltage cycling the electrode in the plating solution without organic additives and, if necessary, polishing the electrode using a fine abrasive. The metal deposition rate can be determined from the current or charge passed during metal electrodeposition but it is usually advantageous to measure the charge associated with anodic stripping of the metal from the electrode. The CVS method was first applied to control copper pyrophosphate baths (U.S. Pat. No. 4,132,605 to Tench and Ogden) but has since been adapted for control of a variety of other plating systems, including the acid copper sulfate baths that are widely used by the electronics industry [e.g., R. Haak, C. Ogden and D. Tench, Plating Surf. Fin. 68(4), 52 (1981) and Plating Surf. Fin. 69(3), 62 (1982)].
Acid copper sulfate electroplating baths require a minimum of two types of organic additives to provide deposits with satisfactory properties and good leveling characteristics. The suppressor additive is typically a polymeric organic species, e.g., high molecular weight polyethylene or polypropylene glycol, which adsorbs strongly on the copper cathode surface to form a film that sharply increases the overvoltage for copper deposition. This prevents uncontrolled copper plating that would result in powdery or nodular deposits. An anti-suppressor additive is required to counter the suppressive effect of the suppressor and provide the mass-transport-limited rate differential needed for leveling. Plating bath vendors typically provide additive solutions that may contain additives of more than one type, as well as other organic and inorganic addition agents. The suppressor additive may be comprised of more than one chemical species and generally involves a range of molecular weights.
Both the suppressor and the anti-suppressor additive concentrations in acid copper sulfate baths can be determined by CVS analysis methods based on the effects that these additives exert on the copper electrodeposition rate. For the suppressor analysis, the CVS rate parameter, usually the copper stripping peak area at a given electrode rotation rate (A
r
), is first measured in a supporting electrolyte having approximately the same composition as the plating bath to be analyzed but without organic addition agents. Additions of known volume ratios of the plating bath to the supporting electrolyte (or to a background electrolyte having known concentrations of other additives) produce decreases in the CVS rate parameter that reflect the concentration of the suppressor additive. This “standard addition” suppressor analysis is not significantly affected by the presence of the anti-suppressor, which exerts a relatively weak effect on the copper deposition rate at the plating bath dilution levels involved. For the anti-suppressor analysis, a sufficient amount of the suppressor additive, which may be comprised of a plurality of components or species, is added to the supporting electrolyte to produce a background electrolyte exhibiting substantially the maximum suppression of the copper deposition rate (minimum CVS rate parameter). Additions of known volume ratios of the plating bath to this fully-suppressed background electrolyte produce increases in the CVS rate parameter that can be related to the concentration of the anti-suppressor additive. The exact procedures for CVS analysis of acid copper sulfate baths can vary.
Analysis for the suppressor additive (also called the “polymer”, “carrier”, or “wetter”, depending on the bath supplier) typically involves generation of a calibration curve by measuring the CVS rate parameter A
r
in a supporting or background electrolyte (without organic additives or with known concentrations of interfering additives), termed A
r
(0), and after each standard addition of the suppressor additive. For the calibration curve, A
r
may be plotted against the suppressor concentration directly, or normalized as A
r
/A
r
(0) to minimize measurement errors associated with changes in the electrode surface, background bath composition, and temperature. For the suppressor analysis itself, A
r
is first measured in the supporting electrolyte and then after each standard addition of a known volume ratio of the plating bath sample to be analyzed. The suppressor concentration may be determined from the A
r
or A
r
/A
r
(0) value for the measurement solution (supporting electrolyte plus a known volume of plating bath sample) by interpolation with respect to the appropriate calibration curve (“response curve analysis”). Alternatively, the suppressor concentration may be determined by the “dilution titration” method from the volume ratio of plating bath sample (added to the supporting electrolyte) required to decrease A
r
or A
r
/A
r
(0) to a given value, which may be a specific numerical value or a minimum value (substantially maximum suppression) [W. O. Freitag, C. Ogden, D. Tench and J. White, Plating Surf. Fin. 70(10), 55 (1983)]. Note that the effect of the anti-suppressor on the suppressor analysis is typically small but can be taken into account by including in the background electrolyte the amount of anti-suppressor measured or estimated to be present in the plating bath being analyzed.
The concentration of the anti-suppressor additive (also called the “brightener”, “accelerator” or simply the “additive”, depending on the bath supplier) is typically determined by the linear approximation technique (LAT) or modified linear approximation technique (MLAT) described by R. Gluzman [Proc. 70
th
Am. Electroplaters Soc. Tech. Conf., Sur/Fin, Indianapolis, Ind. (June 1983)]. The CVS rate parameter, A
r
, is first measured in background electrolyte containing no anti-suppressor but with a sufficient amount of suppressor species added to substantially saturate suppression of the copper deposition rat
Bratin Peter
Chalyt Gene
Kogan Alex
Pavlov Michael
Perpich Michael James
ECI Technology Inc.
King Roy
Leader William T.
Tench D. Morgan
LandOfFree
Method for analysis of three organic additives in an acid... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for analysis of three organic additives in an acid..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for analysis of three organic additives in an acid... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3128342