Data processing: vehicles – navigation – and relative location – Vehicle control – guidance – operation – or indication – Aeronautical vehicle
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-27
2004-03-16
Nguyen, Tan Q. (Department: 3661)
Data processing: vehicles, navigation, and relative location
Vehicle control, guidance, operation, or indication
Aeronautical vehicle
C701S004000, C455S061000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06708090
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to communications and in particular to line-of-sight communications for aircraft and other vehicles.
Aircraft rely on numerous radio signals for safe and efficient flight operations. These radio signals include voice communication channels, data link channels, and navigation signals. Except for certain high frequency (HF) spectrum signals capable of over-the-horizon propagation, most of the above referenced radio signals are limited to line-of-sight operations. The relative positions of the transmitter and receiver; as well as the power output of the transmitter thus control whether the line-of-sight signal will be received. An obstruction such as, for example, terrain located between the transmitter and receiver can prevent the reception of these signals.
In certain operations, knowing in advance if a signal can be received is extremely advantageous. For example, when navigating using a ground based navigation signal, the pilot must know when that signal can no longer be relied upon and the next navigation signal along the route must be tuned in. In current operations under instrument flight rules, the pilot accomplishes this task by reference to a paper instrument navigation chart that shows where along the airway the transition from one navigation facility to the next should occur. The chart additionally indicates minimum altitudes where radio reception from the associated navigation facility can be received with guaranteed minimum standards in a worse case environment. Actual performance may be different in various locations or under certain conditions, but the charts do not reflect this information.
However, this process is not without limitations. First, the indication of transition points and minimum reception altitudes are provided only along established air routes and only on instrument navigation charts. Charts used for flights operating under visual flight rules do not contain this information. For flights between points not on an established airway such as RNAV flights and/or flights conducted using visual flight rules charts, the pilot must independently determine whether the flight occurs within the reception limits of the desired navigation facility. The reception limits are set based on the “service volume” of the navigation facility. The “service volume” defines guaranteed areas of reception based on distance from and altitude above the navigation facility.
FIG. 1
depicts the standard service volumes for various classes of VOR navigation facilities. A standard high-altitude service volume
2
, a standard low altitude service volume
4
, and a standard terminal service volume
6
are shown. Table I also lists the standard service volumes for the various classes of nondirectional beacons (NDB).
TABLE I
NDB Service Volumes
CLASS
DISTANCE (RADIUS)
Compass Locator
15 NM
MH
25 NM
H
50 NM
HH
75 NM
The volumes in FIG.
1
and Table I are only a general standard. The actual service volume for a particular facility may be different due to local topography. The pilot must therefore consult yet a second document called the “Airport Facilities Directory” prior to flight to determine if the proposed flight can be made using that navigation facility. Theoretically, the pilot should also consult this document if a change in flight plan requires use of a navigation facility other than that originally anticipated.
Pilots also typically have a visual cue on the cockpit navigation instrument that indicates when a ground-based navigation signal is not being reliably received but have no ability to predict a future loss of signal.
FIG. 2
shows a course deviation indicator
7
used to track a VOR navigation signal. Indicator
7
of
FIG. 2
includes a course selector card
8
, a course deviation bar
9
, and a “nav flag”
10
. When the aircraft receiver cannot reliably receive the selected VOR station, nav flag
10
appears in the window and indicates that the pilot should not rely on that signal for navigation. The nav flag does not, however, provide the pilot with any information about why the desired signal cannot be received. Similar nav flag devices are used on cockpit indicators used to track glideslope and localizer signals.
Another operation in which relies upon line-of-sight signal reception is voice communications with ground stations. For example, the FAA operates a network of flight service stations throughout the United States. A pilot may contact flight service personnel via radio to activate a flight plan, obtain weather information, or advise of conditions encountered along the route. In practice, the pilot consults the navigation chart to locate the flight service frequency to be used. There may be one or more frequencies indicated on the chart for the region in which the pilot is flying. Often, the pilot tries to contact flight service on one of the indicated frequencies without result because line-of-sight communication is not available to the repeater using that frequency. The pilot must then try additional frequencies until communications are established or change altitude and/or position. This process divides the pilot's attention from the primary task of flying the airplane.
Aircraft and other vehicles also navigate and communicate using satellite-based navigation signals from, for example, GPS, or sat-com devices. For a satellite-based navigation system to provide accurate position information, the satellite receiver must be able to receive, via line-of-sight communications, a sufficient number of satellites and those satellites must be in a distributed geometry. Failure to meet either of these criteria will result in either a degraded or absent navigation solution.
Current GPS technology for instrument flight (IFR) includes RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring): an algorithm which looks ahead of own aircraft position based on the planned route of flight to ensure that there will be both a sufficient number and geometry of satellites in the GPS constellation. If a deficiency is predicted by the RAIM algorithm, the pilots are warned, causing them to either change their velocity or to change their flight routing.
The RAIM algorithm, however, takes into account only the relative positions of the satellites and aircraft and does not take into account the topography that will surround the aircraft as it makes it way along the planned flightpath. Consider, for example, a pilot flying from the Midwest, where the terrain is flat, to Missoula, Mont., which is closely surrounded by tall mountains. An on-board IFR GPS performs RAIM calculations and informs the pilot that there will be adequate satellite coverage for the entire route of flight. As the aircraft commences the IFR approach into Missoula, however, it is possible that one or more of the required satellites will be obscured by the mountains surrounding the airfield, leading to a loss of signal and subsequent loss of the navigation solution.
Aircraft flying instrument rules, or under positive control, are also handed off from one aircraft controller to another as the flight progresses. Frequently, the aircraft is unable to raise the next controller on the newly assigned frequency because the handoff has occurred prematurely, or in a region where communications cannot be completed on the newly assigned frequency due to signal blockage by terrain. Communications are thus temporarily lost until the aircraft comes into view of the new ground station. Not only does this present a potential safety hazard, but the controller must spend time trying to raise the aircraft on the radio. This process occasionally involves asking other aircraft to contact the intended aircraft on the assigned frequency. In certain circumstances, the aircraft must even revert to the previously assigned frequency and ask the prior controller for additional instructions.
Search and rescue operations also rely on line-of-sight communications when tracking emergency locator beacons. Emergency locator beacons can be carried by a person on the ground or, more commonly, a
Honeywell Int'l Inc.
Honeywell International , Inc.
Nguyen Tan Q.
Tran Dalena
LandOfFree
Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3200298