Method and system to verify data received, at a server...

Information security – Monitoring or scanning of software or data including attack... – Intrusion detection

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

08032938

ABSTRACT:
A method and system to compare rendered publication data. The publication data are accessed from a database and then rendered to produce rendered publication data. The rendered publication data are stored to provide a reference version. After a periodic time interval, the publication data are accessed again and rendered to product a second version of rendered publication data. The reference version and the second version of rendered publication data are compared and a notification is generated when a difference exists.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6088803 (2000-07-01), Tso
patent: 6272641 (2001-08-01), Ji
patent: 6289460 (2001-09-01), Hajmiragha
patent: 6366575 (2002-04-01), Barkan et al.
patent: 6560329 (2003-05-01), Draginich et al.
patent: 6721721 (2004-04-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6785732 (2004-08-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6829708 (2004-12-01), Peinado et al.
patent: 6952776 (2005-10-01), Chess
patent: 7013298 (2006-03-01), De La Huerga
patent: 7080407 (2006-07-01), Zhao et al.
patent: 7096215 (2006-08-01), Bates et al.
patent: 7096500 (2006-08-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 7107618 (2006-09-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 7237265 (2007-06-01), Reshef et al.
patent: 7260847 (2007-08-01), Sobel et al.
patent: 7269735 (2007-09-01), Raley et al.
patent: 7328454 (2008-02-01), Strickland et al.
patent: 7418731 (2008-08-01), Touboul
patent: 7526810 (2009-04-01), Lalonde et al.
patent: 2002/0174341 (2002-11-01), Logue et al.
patent: 2003/0018779 (2003-01-01), Hughes et al.
patent: 2003/0023708 (2003-01-01), Jung
patent: 2003/0074574 (2003-04-01), Hursey et al.
patent: 2003/0097591 (2003-05-01), Pham et al.
patent: 2003/0120952 (2003-06-01), Tarbotton et al.
patent: 2003/0144904 (2003-07-01), Beckman et al.
patent: 2003/0212913 (2003-11-01), Vella
patent: 2003/0226033 (2003-12-01), Zinda et al.
patent: 2004/0078569 (2004-04-01), Hotti
patent: 2004/0078580 (2004-04-01), Hsu et al.
patent: 2004/0088570 (2004-05-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 2004/0148281 (2004-07-01), Bates et al.
patent: 2004/0260676 (2004-12-01), Douglis et al.
patent: 2004/0268145 (2004-12-01), Watkins et al.
patent: 2005/0005107 (2005-01-01), Touboul
patent: 2005/0005160 (2005-01-01), Bates et al.
patent: 2005/0021994 (2005-01-01), Barton et al.
patent: 2005/0283833 (2005-12-01), Lalonde et al.
patent: 2005/0283835 (2005-12-01), Lalonde et al.
patent: 2005/0283836 (2005-12-01), Lalonde et al.
patent: 10126752 (2001-12-01), None
patent: 2368163 (2002-04-01), None
patent: WO-02099689 (2002-12-01), None
patent: WO-2006009961 (2006-01-01), None
patent: WO-2006009961 (2006-01-01), None
U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443 Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 19, 2008, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443 Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2007, 13.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443 Response filed Apr. 7, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2007, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443 Response filed Oct. 2, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2008, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2008, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134 Response filed May 22, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2008, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134 Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2008, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134 Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2008, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336 Response filed Jun. 2, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2008, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336 Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2009, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134 Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 18, 2008, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2008, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336 Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2008, 8 pgs.
“Regular expression”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular—expression, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, (Apr. 3, 2008).
“Regular Expression—Definitions from Dictionary.com”, http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/regular%20expression, (2008).
“Regular Expressions—The Single UNIX Specification, Version 2”, http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xbd/re.html, The Open Group, (1997).
“What is Active Content?”,A word definition from the Webopedia Company,(Visited Jun. 13, 2005), 1-2.
Carr, Katherine, “Active content: Friend or foe?”,2002 Sophos Plc.,(Jan. 2002), 10 pages.
Ioannidis, Sotiris, et al., “Sub-Operating Systems: A New Approach to Application Security”,Technical Report MS-CIS-01-06, University of Pennsylvania,(Feb. 2000), 12 pages.
Josang, Audun, et al., “Web Security: The Emperor's New Armour”,Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems(ECIS2001), (Jun. 2001), 11 pages.
Schmall, Markus, “Heuristic Techniques in AV Solutions: An Overview”, SecurityFocus.com, http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1542, (Feb. 2002).
Wallach, Dan S., et al., “Extensible Security Architectures for Java”,16th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles,(Oct. 1997), 26 Pages.
Westermann, Erik, “Learn XML in a Weekend”,ISBN 159200-010-x,(Oct. 2002).
Woods, Bob, “Active Internet Content Dangerous—Report”,Instant Messaging Planet:Security,(Sep. 19, 2002), 1-2.
Zdziarski, Jonathan, “A Plan for Spam”, www.paulgraham.com/spam.html, (Aug 2002).
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 27, 2007”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 14, 2006”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Appeal Brief filed Sep. 10, 2007”, 32 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2007”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 24, 2006”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 18, 2005”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 18, 2006”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Preliminary Amendment mailed Aug. 5, 2005”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Response filed Jan. 18, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 18, 2006”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Response filed Feb. 7, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 18, 2005”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Response filed Jun. 6, 2007 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2007”, 25 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,443, Response filed Jun. 26, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 24, 2006”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 4, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 5, 2005”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Response filed Jan. 21, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2008”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Response filed Feb. 19, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2009”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Response filed Aug. 4, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 4, 2010”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 4, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Apr. 29, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336, Response filed Aug. 24, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2010”, 10 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05762657.4, Supplementary European Search Report mailed Jul. 26, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,134, Response filed Jul. 17, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2009”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,336, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system to verify data received, at a server... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system to verify data received, at a server..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system to verify data received, at a server... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4266643

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.