Method and system therefor for ensuring a true activation of...

Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – With particular system function

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C340S507000, C340S527000, C340S529000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06294991

ABSTRACT:

FILED OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to distributed restoration algorithm (DRA) networks, and more particularly to a method and system therefor of ensuring that the triggering of the distributed restoration process in a telecommunications network is not due to false alarms or failures.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A telecommunications network may employ a combination of several approaches for restoring traffic flow interrupted by equipment failure or malfunction. For example, a network may rely upon a 1:1 automatic protect switching for some portions, distributed restoration (DRA) for other portions or domains of the network, and finally a centralized control of rerouting for situations not readily handled by the other approaches or schemes.
The automatic protection switching (APS) scheme, although wasteful of bandwidth, nonetheless is useful in some cases where simplicity and speed are required. The DRA scheme, on the other hand, takes slightly longer and may conceivably be considered more complex. But the DRA scheme is also more adaptable than APS and can leverage mesh restorability. For both APS and DRA schemes, restoration is triggered by the detection of transmission alarm conditions that result from occurred failures.
In a network where there are a number of schemes such as APS and DRA, even though the failure may quickly be circumvented by the APS scheme, the DRA provisioned nodes of the network may also begin to respond to the same failure, all of the while oblivious to the activities being carried on by the APS process. Such unnecessary triggering of the DRA process is undesirable, insofar as the DRA provisioned portion of the network, while the DRA process is ongoing, becomes vulnerable as the DRA process seeks to reserve spare links for the distributed restoration. Accordingly, any subsequent real failures could be precluded from complete and timely restoration due to this false triggering of the DRA process. To overcome this shortcoming, the DRA scheme must verify the genuineness of the failure before taking action.
It would appear that a simple solution is the provision of a timer. However, the provision of a timer for such multi-restoration schemes is inadequate because there are numerous links that interconnect the nodes of the network, and any one of those links can generate an alarm condition. It is therefore possible for two or more separate short duration alarm events to overlap enough so that those events would appear to be a single long duration alarm event, thereby activating the DRA process.
There is therefore a need for a robust method for determining when a DRA process may be activated.
Moreover, there is a need to have the DRA process start as quickly as possible, when it is needed, and yet not be triggered by false alarms.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
To ensure that a true activation of the DRA process takes place in the DRA provisioned domains of a network, each port of a node, or for example the digital cross-connect or an intelligent device, of the network is provided with a defect validation timer. This timer is user programable and could be preset, for example, with a nominal value of 100 ms. When an alarm condition is received, the timer is started. And if the alarm condition persists until the timer expires, then the alarm is deemed validated. In other words, the alarm is deemed to be a true alarm that merits the activation of the DRA process.
Once validated, an alarm can only be idled if it becomes inactive and remains inactive for a period of time. In practice, the same defect validation timer can be used for idling an alarm. Thus, when an alarm goes inactive, it starts the timer and the inactive state of the alarm is validated when the inactive alarm persists until the defect validation timer expires.
In the meantime, the quantity of the validated alarms is maintained by a defect counter, which is programmed with a predetermined threshold value. If the number of validated alarms, as counted by the counter, exceeds the preset threshold, the DRA process is initiated.
As alarms can come and go in a network, there may actually be continuous incrementing, as well as decrementing, of the count in the defect counter. But so long as the summed validated alarms remains above the preset threshold, the DRA process continues.
The present invention therefore achieves the objective of providing a more reliable, yet timely, initiation of the DRA process in a network so that the DRA process can coexist with other restoration processes such as the APS and central restoration schemes.
The instant invention achieves the further objective of adapting the initiation of the DRA process to the access/egress ports of the nodes of the network.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4648088 (1985-08-01), Cagle et al.
patent: 4853927 (1989-05-01), Wenzel
patent: 4884263 (1989-11-01), Suzuki
patent: 4956835 (1990-09-01), Grover
patent: 5070497 (1991-12-01), Kleine-Altekamp
patent: 5146452 (1992-09-01), Pekarske
patent: 5173689 (1992-12-01), Kusano
patent: 5189662 (1993-02-01), Kleine-Altekamp
patent: 5218601 (1990-12-01), Chujo et al.
patent: 5233600 (1993-08-01), Pekarske
patent: 5235599 (1994-06-01), Nishimura
patent: 5319632 (1995-07-01), Iwasaki
patent: 5325366 (1994-06-01), Shinbashi
patent: 5435003 (1995-07-01), Chng et al.
patent: 5455832 (1995-10-01), Bowmaster
patent: 5479608 (1995-12-01), Richardson
patent: 5493273 (1996-02-01), Smurlo et al.
patent: 5495471 (1996-02-01), Chow et al.
patent: 5537532 (1996-07-01), Chng et al.
patent: 5548639 (1996-08-01), Ogura
patent: 5586112 (1996-12-01), Tabata
patent: 5590118 (1996-12-01), Nederlof
patent: 5590119 (1996-12-01), Moran et al.
patent: 5598403 (1995-06-01), Tatsuki
patent: 5623481 (1997-04-01), Russ et al.
patent: 5636203 (1997-06-01), Shah
patent: 5636206 (1997-06-01), Amemiya et al.
patent: 5646936 (1997-07-01), Shah et al.
patent: 5657320 (1997-08-01), Russ et al.
patent: 5680326 (1997-10-01), Russ et al.
patent: 5710777 (1998-02-01), Gawne
patent: 5721727 (1998-02-01), Ashi et al.
patent: 5734687 (1998-03-01), Kainulainen
patent: 5748611 (1998-05-01), Allen et al.
patent: 5748617 (1998-05-01), McLain, Jr.
patent: 5757774 (1998-05-01), Oka
patent: 5781535 (1998-07-01), Russ et al.
patent: 5802144 (1998-09-01), Laird et al.
patent: 5812524 (1998-09-01), Moran et al.
patent: 5832196 (1998-11-01), Croslin et al.
patent: 5838660 (1998-11-01), Croslin
patent: 5841759 (1997-01-01), Russ et al.
patent: 5850505 (1998-12-01), Grover et al.
patent: 5852600 (1998-12-01), Russ
patent: 5862125 (1999-06-01), Russ
patent: 5862362 (1999-01-01), Somasegar et al.
patent: 5867689 (1999-02-01), McLain, Jr.
patent: 5933422 (1999-08-01), Kusano et al.
patent: 5943314 (1999-08-01), Croslin
patent: 5991338 (1999-11-01), Trommel
patent: 5999286 (1999-12-01), Venkatesan
patent: 6026077 (2000-02-01), Iwata
patent: 6044064 (2000-03-01), Brimmage et al.
patent: 6049529 (2000-04-01), Brimmage et al.
patent: 6104695 (2000-08-01), Wesley et al.
patent: 6108309 (2000-08-01), Cohoe et al.
patent: 6137775 (2000-10-01), Bartlett et al.
patent: 6154448 (2000-11-01), Peterson et al.
patent: 6167025 (2000-12-01), Hsing et al.
patent: 96/41440 (1996-12-01), None
patent: 97/48189 (1997-12-01), None
Bouloutas et al. “Alarm Correlation and Fault Identification in Communication Networks”; 1994 IEEE Transactions and Communications.
Manione et al.; “An Inconsistencies Tolerant Approach in the Fault Design of Telecommunications Network”; Feb. 14, 1994.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system therefor for ensuring a true activation of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system therefor for ensuring a true activation of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system therefor for ensuring a true activation of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2526023

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.