Method and system for valuing advertising content

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S014410, C705S014430

Reexamination Certificate

active

08036932

ABSTRACT:
Methods and media are provided for objectively valuing advertising content (or the potential viewer impact thereof) that occur during the course of an event or other presentation (such as TV sitcom). In one embodiment the method includes receiving a source of media, indexing a set of sponsorship images within the media to provide a set of indices, and providing valuation factors by aggregating the indices so that valuation factors can be derived that indicate a viewer's potential awareness of the advertising content or images therein. The valuation factors can be used in connection with a benchmark, such as the 30-second spot rate or time, to determine a value associated with the media source, including a monetary value.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5512933 (1996-04-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5748263 (1998-05-01), Ball
patent: 5819259 (1998-10-01), Duke-Moran et al.
patent: 5870151 (1999-02-01), Korber
patent: 6021231 (2000-02-01), Miyatake et al.
patent: 6038554 (2000-03-01), Vig
patent: 6100925 (2000-08-01), Rosser et al.
patent: 6286005 (2001-09-01), Cannon
patent: 6292688 (2001-09-01), Patton
patent: 6431985 (2002-08-01), Kim
patent: 6469749 (2002-10-01), Dimitrova et al.
patent: 6671676 (2003-12-01), Shacham
patent: 6698020 (2004-02-01), Zigmond et al.
patent: 6760916 (2004-07-01), Holtz et al.
patent: 6820277 (2004-11-01), Eldering et al.
patent: 2001/0020236 (2001-09-01), Cannon
patent: 2002/0056124 (2002-05-01), Hay
patent: 2002/0062250 (2002-05-01), Nagano et al.
patent: 2002/0072971 (2002-06-01), DeBusk et al.
patent: 2002/0107721 (2002-08-01), Darwent et al.
patent: 2003/0050827 (2003-03-01), Hennessey et al.
patent: 2003/0070167 (2003-04-01), Holtz et al.
patent: 2003/0091237 (2003-05-01), Cohen-Solal et al.
patent: 2003/0099459 (2003-05-01), Yanagita et al.
patent: 2003/0101144 (2003-05-01), Moreno
patent: 2003/0135460 (2003-07-01), Talegon
patent: 2003/0226141 (2003-12-01), Krasnow et al.
patent: 2003/0229536 (2003-12-01), House et al.
patent: 2004/0073916 (2004-04-01), Petrovic et al.
patent: 2004/0093296 (2004-05-01), Phelan et al.
patent: 2004/0098744 (2004-05-01), Gutta
patent: 2006/0230053 (2006-10-01), Eldering
patent: 0593202 (1977-03-01), None
patent: 0377515 (1990-07-01), None
patent: 1137281 (2001-09-01), None
patent: 1333666 (2003-08-01), None
patent: WO 96/27983 (1996-09-01), None
patent: WO 98/41934 (1998-09-01), None
patent: WO 00/64165 (2000-10-01), None
patent: WO 01/03041 (2001-01-01), None
patent: WO 01/07985 (2001-02-01), None
patent: WO 01/48665 (2001-07-01), None
patent: WO 01/99416 (2001-12-01), None
patent: WO 02/01471 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO 02/05121 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO 02/17146 (2002-02-01), None
patent: WO 02/067587 (2002-08-01), None
patent: WO 02/087244 (2002-10-01), None
patent: WO 03/014949 (2003-02-01), None
patent: WO 03/030011 (2003-04-01), None
patent: WO 03/054654 (2003-07-01), None
patent: WO 03/063041 (2003-07-01), None
patent: WO 03/093930 (2003-11-01), None
patent: WO 2004/004351 (2004-01-01), None
patent: WO 2004/036352 (2004-04-01), None
patent: WO 2004/068317 (2004-08-01), None
Homer, Pamela M. (1995), “Ad Size as an Indicator of Perceived Advertising Cost and Effort: The Effects on Memory and Perceptions,” Journal of Advertising, Winter 95, vol. 24, p. 1.
Rossiter, John, “Brain-Imaging Detection of Visual Scene Encoding in Long-Term Memory for TV Commercials,” Journal of Advertising Research, Mar./Apr. 2001, vol. 41, Issue 2, p. 13.
Janiszewski, Chris, Meyvis, Tom, “Effects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research; Jun. 2001, vol. 28, p. 18.
Unnava, H. Rao, Sirdeshmukh, Deepak, “Reducing Competitive Ad Interference,” Journal of Marketing Research, Aug. 1994, vol. 31, p. 403.
Zhao, Xinshu, “Clutter and Serial Order Redefined and Retested,” Journal of Advertising Research, Sep./Oct. 1997, p. 57.
Borresen, C. Robert, Kauth, M, “Perception of Objects from Selected Parts,” Journal of Psychology, vol. 126 (1), p. 93.
“Mass Media,” Communications Daily, Apr. 25, 2002, vol. 22.
Shreve, Jenn, “Sites Unseen,” Industry Standard, Mar. 19, 2001,vol. 4, p. 91.
Manning, Ric, “Publisher Pulls the Plug on Pioneer Portal Site,” Boardwatch Magazine, Aug. 1, 1999, vol. 13, p. 32.
Nash, Jim, “Turning the Tide with Technology: EDI Could Transform the TV Ad Business, but it won't be Smooth Sailing,” Computer World, Dec. 24, 1990, vol. 24, p. 47.
“TNS to Take on Evaliant Ad Monitoring in Acquisition,” New Media Age, Jun. 13, 2002, p. 3.
Hardcastle, S., “Canned Goods: Leading Brands in the UK,” Grocer, 2002, vol. 225, pp. 43-44.
Roberts, A., “Measuring the Short-Term Sales Effects of TV Adverstising,” AdMap, 1998, vol. 33, pp. 50-52.
Gofton, Ken, “Charting the Market,” Marketing, Sep. 24, 1998, pp. 45-51.
Pollack, Judann, “Marketers Slap Network TV on Survey on ROI,” Advertising Age, vol. 74, Oct. 13, 2003, pp. 0, 66.
Paletta, L., A. Goyal, C. Greindl, “Selective Visual Attention in Object Detection Processes,” Proceedings of the Spie—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2003, vol. 5015, pp. 11-21.
Thomas, Daniel, “Sponsors' Data Breaks Down in an F1 Pit-Stop: A Review of Formula One Audience Data has Seen Viewer Numbers Slashed, Leaving Many Sponsors Doubting the Value of their Deals. But with No Industry Standard, Chaos Reigns,” Marketing Week, Mar. 18, 2004.
“TV Doesn't Sell Package Goods Study Shows Medium Fails to Deliver ROI for Mature Brands,” Advertising Age, May 24, 2004, vol. 75, p. 1.
Whitthaus, Michele, “Stakes are High when Tv Channel Rates Rise,” Precision Marketing, Aug. 4, 1997, p. 18.
Hendickson, Paula, “With '96 Ratings Slippage, Nets' Time Values Softens,” Advertising Age, May 12, 1997, p. S8.
“Firms Using Research to Assess Sponsorship Value,” Marketing News, Oct. 26, 1992, vol. 26, p. 13.
Flack, J.A., “Sports Sponsorship is a Team Game: Assessing the Value of Event Sponsorship,” Marketing Week, Jul. 25, 2002, pp. 35-37.
Tyler, D., “Sponsorship: Why Bother?” Management Accounting, 1999, vol. 77, pp. 20-21.
Cornwell, B., S. Pruitt, R. Van Ness, The Value in Winning in Motorsports: Sponsorship Linked-Marketing, Journal of Advertising Research, Jan. 1, 2001, vol. 41, pp. 17-31.
“BIZ360 Secures Six New Partners to Extend Global Footprint and Real-Time Broadcast and Online Monitoring Capabilities Industry's Most Extensive Partner Network for Global Reputation and Brand Analysis Services,” PR Newswire, Jun. 7, 2004.
LexisNexis and BIZ360 Form Alliance to Help Executives Manage Corporate Reputation and Build Brands; LexisNexis to Stream Access to XML News Content Into BIZ360's Market Intelligence Application, PR Newswire, Jun. 7, 2004.
IBM and National Football League Team for Sponsorship and Information Technology Agreement, Business Wire, Jul. 23, 2003.
Atlas DMT Unveils First-Ever Brand Exposure Duration Metric that Quantifies the Value of Rich Media Campaigns for Brand Advertisers, Business Wire, Jul. 14, 2003.
IDG's Computerworld.com Ranks Among Top Media Venues For Advertising Value; Recognition Validates Online Resource as ‘Go to Site’ for Enterprise IT News, Research, Business Wire, May 14, 2003.
“West Glen Communications Breaks Through Industry Measurement and Analysis Obstacles with Brand Dashboard (TM) from Cymfony; Only Broadcast PR Agency to Employ Advanced Analytics Software that Delivers Immediate Results,” PR Newswire, Apr. 14, 2003.
“Super Bowl Advertising: KN Research Reveals How Captivated Viewers Deliver Big Win for Marketers; New Study Shows 65% Say Ads are as Interesting as Game,” PR Newswire, Jan. 31, 2003.
HookMedia's Artemis Revolutionizes the Managment of Digital Advertising Campaigns; New Patent-Pending Data Mangement and Reporting

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for valuing advertising content does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for valuing advertising content, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for valuing advertising content will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4261998

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.