Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices – circuits – and – Specific input to output function – Combining of plural signals
Reexamination Certificate
2002-05-15
2003-12-23
Callahan, Timothy P. (Department: 2816)
Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices, circuits, and
Specific input to output function
Combining of plural signals
C455S326000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06667649
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to a superheterodyne receiver and more particularly to utilizing a mixer as such a receiver.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1
illustrates a conventional superheterodyne receiver. The typical superheterodyne receiver
10
includes a low noise amplifier (LNA)
12
which is placed near an antenna (not shown) for receiving the signal. The signal typically is at a level that is comparable to a noise component therein. The LNA
12
is coupled to an image-rejection filter
14
. The image-rejection filter
14
is coupled to an active mixer
16
.
FIG. 2
illustrates a conventional LNA
14
. The low noise amplifier includes first and second transistors coupled to a current source. The gain stage is degraded from the Miller Effect capacitance.
FIG. 3
illustrates a typical active mixer
16
. The active mixer includes four switching devices coupled to the LNA to provide the differential output voltage. Typically the gain of mixer
16
is reduced and the noise is increased due to commutation of the switching devices that decreases the signal level and provides an image noise simultaneously. Each of the stages (LNA
12
, filter
14
and mixer
16
) provides both gain (G) and noise factor (F) the receiver
10
.
In a typical receiver, the noise factor is strongly influenced by the gain distribution, i.e.,
F
Total
=F
1st
+(
F
2nd
−1)/
G
1st
+(
F
3rd
−1)/
G
1st
/G
2nd
(1)
Where F
1st
is the LNA
12
, F
2nd
is the filter
14
, and F
3rd
represents the mixer
16
. In general, the mixer
16
is a noisy stage and the filter
14
is required to reject image noise from entering the mixer
16
. The filter
14
typically provides a loss to the receiver.
In a receiver, the sensitivity is determined by the ratio of the received signal and F
Total
at the antenna. Since the received signal is dictated by the antenna design, so the designer is limited to noise reduction option in order to maximize the sensitivity. A common approach to minimize the noise factor of the receiver is to provide a LNA
12
with good noise performance and high gain to keep F
Total
low.
In this configuration, the LNA
12
provides high gain to suppress the noise contributions from the filter
14
and the mixer
16
. However, the problem is that with a conventional receiver there is always a compromise between noise and linearity. To further describe this problem, refer now to the following. In a typical receiver there are intermodulation distortion products (IDPs) which are produced by signals that are not of the same frequency but which create spurious signals within the frequency band.
In a typical receiver, the IDPs are produced by two strong signals at one and two times the frequency offset from the frequency of interest interacting with each other in a manner which provides intermodulation distortion at the exact frequency of interest in operation. For example, if the channel is
3
and there are two strong signals, one at channel
10
and one at channel
17
, those two signals have a frequency spacing of
7
. This frequency spacing of
7
can cause two spurious signals or intermodulation products at the same frequency range of the signal that is desired, i.e., channel
3
and
24
. These spurious signals, or IDPs, then interfere with the signal that is desired. Accordingly, a figure of merit for the spurious signals is called IIP3, which stands for input third order intercept point.
IIP3, as is well known, describes how strong the IDPs are. The system IIP3 is degraded by the added gain stage that is meant to improve the system noise figure. For example, if an LNA whose gain is 15 dB is added in, the the IIP3 of the system will be degraded by no less than 15 dB. Accordingly, equation (2) describes the strength of the IDPs of the system.
1/IIP3
Total
=1/IIP3
1st
+G
1st
/IIP3
2nd
(2)
Accordingly, while added gain will improve system noise figure for better receiver sensitivity, the added gain could degrade the total IIP3 and therefore adversely affect the performance of the system.
In order to solve the dilemma, the traditional approach is to add the LNA
12
(gain stage
1
), and improve the IIP3 of the mixer
16
(gain stage
2
). In so doing, in an ideal environment an increase on the G
1st
(numerator) should be matched by an increase on the IIP3
2nd
(denominator) to maintain good IIP3
Total
., as suggested by the second term in Eq.2. However, improving the IIP3 means either higher power consumption or more feedback (gain reduction) for the mixer. Since higher power consumption is not a preferred solution in general, the designer would end up with a situation that extra gain is added in the front but some gain has to be thrown out in the following stage, thus requires even more stages to be inserted in the system thereby adding to the inefficiency of the system.
Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method for overcoming the above-identified problem. The present invention addresses such a need.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A mixer is disclosed. The mixer comprises a high isolation gain stage and an impedance transformation network coupled to the gain stage. The mixer includes a plurality of switching devices coupled to the network and a phase shifter coupled to the plurality of switching devices. The mixer is utilized as a receiver and a low noise amplifier is not needed.
A receiver in accordance with the present invention achieves high gain and low noise in the mixer and therefore eliminates the need for a separate LNA. In so doing, an isolation gain stage achieves high gain, and image noise is rejected before entering the mixer stage.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4999589 (1991-03-01), DaSilva
patent: 5271276 (1993-12-01), Katakura et al.
patent: 5517687 (1996-05-01), Niehenke et al.
patent: 6094084 (2000-07-01), Abou-Allam et al.
patent: 6157822 (2000-12-01), Bastani et al.
patent: 6308058 (2001-10-01), Souetinov et al.
patent: 6486824 (2002-11-01), Shupe
Callahan Timothy P.
Cox Cassandra
Ralink Technology, Inc.
Sawyer Law Group LLP
LandOfFree
Method and system for utilizing a high-performance mixer as... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and system for utilizing a high-performance mixer as..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for utilizing a high-performance mixer as... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3170886