Data processing: artificial intelligence – Knowledge processing system – Knowledge representation and reasoning technique
Reexamination Certificate
2010-09-10
2011-11-01
Chaki, Kakali (Department: 2122)
Data processing: artificial intelligence
Knowledge processing system
Knowledge representation and reasoning technique
Reexamination Certificate
active
08051027
ABSTRACT:
A computer implemented method including determining whether a predetermined condition is satisfied with respect to a case-based dataset stored within memory accessible by at least one processor; generating, for each of a plurality of rule-based classifiers, rule-based classification data identifying class boundaries between the records upon determining that the predetermined condition has been satisfied; computing a structural risk of the rule-based classification data for each of the rule-based classifiers with respect to the records identified within the record data; selecting rule-based classifiers having generated rule-based classification data identifying class boundaries between the records with a structural risk below a predetermined threshold; identifying selected rule-based classifiers having rule-based classification data that is within a predetermined degree of similarity with the case-based classification data; and replacing the case-based dataset stored within the memory with rule-based classification data of at least one of the identified rule-based classifiers, wherein determining whether the predetermined condition is satisfied comprises determining whether the number of records identified within the record data exceeds a predetermined record threshold.
REFERENCES:
patent: 6138115 (2000-10-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6389436 (2002-05-01), Chakrabarti et al.
patent: 2001/0056362 (2001-12-01), Hanagan et al.
patent: 2002/0038307 (2002-03-01), Obradovic et al.
patent: 2004/0066966 (2004-04-01), Schneiderman
Examiner Interview Summaryfrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 mailed May 27, 2010.
Final Office Actionfrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 mailed Nov. 9, 2009.
Non Final Office Actionfrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 mailed May 6, 2009.
Non Final Office Actionfrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 mailed Dec. 18, 2008.
Notice of Allowancefrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 mailed May 27, 2010.
Non FinalOffice Actionfrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 dated Mar. 17, 2008.
Pre-Brief Appeal Conference Decisionfrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 mailed Apr. 8, 2010.
“Programs, Junk and Other Things That Get in the Way”,PC MagazineSep. 23, 2004, pp. 1-26.
Giacinto, Giorgio et al., “Dynamic Classifier Selection Based on Multiple Classifier Behavior”,Pattern Recognition 34, The Journal of Pattern Recognition Society, pp. 1879-1881 2001.
Talwadker, Ameet S., “Survey of Performance Issues in Parallel Database Systems”,Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Mississippi, University, MS, (662) 915-7310, ameet@cs.olemiss.edu Jun. 6, 2003 , 5 pages.
Final Office Actionfrom U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637 mailed Aug. 18, 2008.
Wahba, Grace , “Soft and Hard Classification by Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Methods”,Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Oct. 29, 2002, pp. 1-20.
Chiranjit; U.S. Appl. No. 11/387,637, filed Mar. 22, 2006.
Chaki Kakali
Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery
Rifkin Ben
Sony Corporation
Sony Electronics Inc.
LandOfFree
Method and system for transitioning from a case-based... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and system for transitioning from a case-based..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for transitioning from a case-based... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4276840