Method and system for the automatic recognition of deceptive...

Data processing: speech signal processing – linguistics – language – Linguistics – Natural language

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C704S001000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07853445

ABSTRACT:
A system for identifying deception within a text includes a processor for receiving and processing a text file. The processor includes a deception indicator tag analyzer for inserting into the text file at least one deception indicator tag that identifies a potentially deceptive word or phrase within the text file, and an interpreter for interpreting the at least one deception indicator tag to determine a distribution of potentially deceptive word or phrases within the text file and generating deception likelihood data based upon the density or distribution of potentially deceptive word or phrases within the text file. A method for identifying deception within a text includes the steps of receiving a first text to be analyzed, normalizing the first text to produce a normalized text, inserting into the normalized text at least one part-of-speech tag that identifies a part of speech of a word associated with the part-of-speech tag, inserting into the normalized text at least one syntactic label that identifies a linguistic construction of one or more words associated with the syntactic label, inserting into the normalized text at least one deception indicator tag that identifies a potentially deceptive word or phrase within the normalized text, interpreting the at least one deception indicator tag to determine a distribution of potentially deceptive word or phrases within the normalized text, and generating deception likelihood data based upon the density or frequency of distribution of potentially deceptive word or phrases within the normalized text.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5438511 (1995-08-01), Maxwell, III et al.
patent: 6721734 (2004-04-01), Subasic et al.
patent: 6963830 (2005-11-01), Nakao
patent: 7020607 (2006-03-01), Adachi
patent: 7058566 (2006-06-01), Shaw
patent: 7260519 (2007-08-01), Polanyi et al.
patent: 7356463 (2008-04-01), Isabelle
patent: 7369985 (2008-05-01), Polanyi et al.
patent: 7386442 (2008-06-01), Dehlinger et al.
patent: 7424420 (2008-09-01), Polanyi et al.
patent: 7689410 (2010-03-01), Chang et al.
patent: 2003/0212546 (2003-11-01), Shaw
Bachenko et al. “Verification and Implementation of Language-based Deception Indicators in Civil and Criminal Narratives,” Proceedings of the 22ndInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics, Manchester, United Kingdom, pp. 41-48 (Aug. 2008). (XP002536462).
“SCAN: Deception Detection by Scientific Content Analysis” by Tony Lesce, reprinted with permission from ‘Law and Order’. vol. 38, No. 8, Aug. 1990.
“Basis Technology and TEMIS join to deliver multilingual text mining solutions”, Press Release, 2005.
“A Maximum Entropy Approach to Identifying Sentence Boundaries”, by Jeffrey C. Reynar and Adwait Ratnaparkhi, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, pp. 16-19, Apr. 3, 1997.
A Stochastic Parts Program and Noun Phrase Parser for Unrestricted Text,Proceedings of the 2ndConference on Applied Natural Language Processing(ANLP '88), Garside, R., G. Leech and A. McEnery, 1988, pp. 136-143.
“Deceptive Communication”, by Gerald Miller and James B. Stiff, Sage Publications, 1993, pp. 50-67; pp. 102-117.
“Detecting Lies and Deceit”, by Aldert Vrij, 2000, pp. 103-155, pp. 209-225.
“The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception”, by Roger W. Shuy, Sage Publications, pp. 74-79, 1998.
“Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for Detecting Deception in Text-based Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication”, by Lina Zhou,Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 13, pp. 81-106, 2004.
“The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts”, edited by Par Anders Granhag and Leif A. Stromwall, Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-66, 2004.
“The Language of Deceit: An Investigation of the Verbal Clues to Deception in the Interrogation Context”, by Stephen Porter and John C. Yuille,Law and Human Behaviour, vol. 20, No. 4, 1996, pp. 443-458.
“Reality Monitoring”, by Marcia K. Johnson and Carol L. Raye,Physchological Review, 1981, vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 67-85.
“Investigation and Evaluation of Voice Stress Analysis Technology”, by Darren Haddad et al., Mar. 20, 2002,U.S. National Department of Justice.
“Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank”, by Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, 1993,Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 313-330.
“Periods, Capitalized Words, Etc.”, by Andrei Mikheev, 1994,Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1-32, vol. 16, No. 1.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for the automatic recognition of deceptive... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for the automatic recognition of deceptive..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for the automatic recognition of deceptive... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4219694

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.