Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Product assembly or manufacturing
Reexamination Certificate
2001-03-02
2004-01-20
Picard, Leo (Department: 2125)
Data processing: generic control systems or specific application
Specific application, apparatus or process
Product assembly or manufacturing
C702S108000, C702S119000, C714S724000, C700S079000, C700S081000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06681142
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to testing methods and systems for electronic devices. In particular, the present invention relates to computerized testing of mobile telephones.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
The increasing quality demands regarding technical devices, particularly electronic devices, as well as the ever increasing demand for such technical devices, has created a need for efficient test methods in order to determine the operativeness of the test pieces.
Since production of such devices is automatically carried out primarily, automatically running test methods are also desired. These methods are a part of a production process running on a production line, mostly at the end of the production process in order to determine the quality of the end product. Intermediate products can be potentially checked as well concerning their operativeness in order to eliminate rejected goods early from the production process.
The test methods can also be utilized for an individual testing position, whereby the test itself is carried out fully automatic, but the responsible quality control staff must arrange for feeding and carrying-off of test pieces to the test modules. This type of testing is primarily used for apparatuses which have been returned by the user to the manufacturer due to an error that has occurred during the operation.
As a result of the increasing complexity of the test pieces, it is often necessary to distribute the testing tasks to two or more test modules, which are optimally suitable for a specific part of the entire test due to their construction. This distribution, however, additionally requires utilization of a central control computer for assignment of test orders for the individual parts of the test to the respective test modules.
The test modules themselves comprise interfaces with respect to the input units and output units of the test pieces and are extremely versatile due to the large bandwidth of functions of technical devices.
Some examples of input units include: mechanical input units such as switches, keys, keyboards, touch screens; potentiometers or the like; radio receiver interfaces operating according to the GSM standard or DECT standard; optical input units such as an infrared receiver interface; acoustic input units such as microphones; electrical input units such as serial interfaces or parallel interfaces; optical input units, such as solar cells; and electrical input units, such as the load socket of a device operated by accumulators.
Some examples of output units include: mechanical output units such as printer heads or devices for Braille printing; radio transmitter interfaces operating according to the GSM standard or the DECT standard; optical output units such as an infrared transmitter interface; acoustic output units, primarily loudspeakers; and electrical output units, for example transmitters of serial interfaces or parallel interfaces; mechanical output units, such as a computer-controlled cutter head or milling head of a metals processing milling machine; and electrical output units, such as the output of a current inverter for transforming alternating current into direct-current.
It is expressively pointed out that, as a result of the versatileness of technical possibilities of the method and system of the present invention, the aforementioned are only an extract of conceivable input units and output units upon which the method and system of the present invention is useful on.
Test modules can comprise input units and output units at the same time, therefore transmitters and receivers of a bi-directional infrared transmission path, for example. In any case, a test module must always contain the proper counter-piece of the input unit or output unit present on the test piece. For example, when a microphone is provided on the test piece for the input unit, the test module must have a loudspeaker for testing this input unit. For example, when keyboards contained on the test piece are to be tested, rams that are pneumatically or electromagnetically operated and that operate the corresponding keys by a defined pressure are expedient.
It is known from WO 98/45720, which is directed to a test system and method, that electrical test pieces can be tested concerning their electrical functions. On the basis of a test rule to be fixed by the user, the test process is controlled by a control module, whereby the individual sub-tests, which are carried out by the test modules, are sequentially executed. The total duration of a test process therefore derives as sum of the times necessary for the respective sub-tests.
If the total duration for the function testing of a technical device is greater than the time necessary for its production, a plurality of testing positions must be potentially provided for one and the same product. In order to avoid this extremely involved method, only sample-like tests are often carried out as a result thereof, so that a degradation of the produced merchandise results.
Due to the individual tests running at the same time, the total duration for testing a test piece is equal to the time outlay for the longest individual test. If specific individual tests can only run sequentially as a result of their manner, the time span for the longest lasting combination is to be used. In any case, time is saved vis-à-vis purely sequentially running individual tests.
Field bus systems are particularly suitable for the communication between the control computer and the test modules or, respectively, for the communication of the test modules among one another, for example for chronologically synchronizing specific sub-tests. Furthermore, field bus systems are extremely secure regarding interferences and possibly occurring errors can be easily localized due to the bus structure. Embodiments of a field bus system are the professional bus or the CAN bus, for example. In addition to the already mentioned advantages, the ease of modifying an already existing test system, which is frequently required in practical operation, plays a deciding role. As a result of the bus structure, addresses of the test modules are freely definable and are available in large numbers.
Field bus systems primarily work with electrical signals, whereby it is also conceivable to use optical transmission media or, radio transmission paths. Moreover, it is also possible to simultaneously use different embodiments of a field bus system within a test system.
According to the method and system of the present invention, the input units and output units of the test piece are tested with at least two different test modules, performing at least two different functions. The process of the test is controlled by a control program running in a central control computer.
A particularly advantageous embodiment of the invention provides a method, wherein the control program running in the central control computer comprises a user-specific part and this user-specific part of the control program is independent of the test modules and transport modules that are connected to the central control computer.
The author of a rule controlling the test process does not need detailed knowledge about the structure of the test system, since only global indications must be made for this part of the program running in the control computer. The adaptation to the actual givens ensues separately from this independent test rule. In this way, one and the same program can be utilized unmodified for a test process in a production line or given an individual testing position. Furthermore, the test system can be easily modified in this respect, for example an exchange of a test module against a more modern one, since only the device-specific part of the program running in the central control computer is subject to this modification.
It is also advantageous to have the test modules and transport modules connected to the central control computer be recognized with the aid of the control program running in the central control computer
Lee Douglas S.
Picard Leo
Schiff & Hardin & Waite
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
LandOfFree
Method and system for testing a test piece does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and system for testing a test piece, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for testing a test piece will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3203217