Method and system for scenario and case decision management

Data processing: structural design – modeling – simulation – and em – Simulating nonelectrical device or system

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C166S060000, C166S380000, C166S302000, C166S300000, C166S263000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07835893

ABSTRACT:
A system and method may be configured to support the evaluation of the economic impact of uncertainties associated with the planning of a petroleum production project, e.g., uncertainties associated with decisions having multiple possible outcomes and uncertainties associated with uncontrollable parameters such as rock properties, oil prices, etc. The system and method involve receiving user input characterizing the uncertainty of planning variables and performing an iterative simulation that computes the economic return for various possible instantiations of the set of planning variables based on the uncertainty characterization. The system and method may (a) utilize and integrate highly rigorous physical reservoir, well, production flow, and economic models, and (b) provide a mechanism for specifying constraints on the planning variables. Furthermore, the system and method may provide a case manager process for managing multiple cases and associated “experimental runs” on the cases.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5103920 (1992-04-01), Patton
patent: 5838634 (1998-11-01), Jones et al.
patent: 5980096 (1999-11-01), Thalhammer-Reyero
patent: 5992519 (1999-11-01), Ramakrishnan et al.
patent: 6106561 (2000-08-01), Farmer
patent: 6236894 (2001-05-01), Stoisits et al.
patent: 6266619 (2001-07-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 6356844 (2002-03-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 6549854 (2003-04-01), Malinverno et al.
patent: 6715551 (2004-04-01), Curtis et al.
patent: 6735596 (2004-05-01), Corynen
patent: 6810332 (2004-10-01), Harrison
patent: 6853921 (2005-02-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 6980940 (2005-12-01), Gurpinar et al.
patent: 7010558 (2006-03-01), Morris
patent: 7047171 (2006-05-01), Sproch
patent: 7096172 (2006-08-01), Colvin et al.
patent: 7130761 (2006-10-01), Hall et al.
patent: 7277836 (2007-10-01), Netemeyer et al.
patent: 7349838 (2008-03-01), Summers
patent: 7379890 (2008-05-01), Myr et al.
patent: 7389209 (2008-06-01), Masiello et al.
patent: 7467045 (2008-12-01), Tabanou et al.
patent: 7474995 (2009-01-01), Masiello et al.
patent: 2001/0042642 (2001-11-01), King
patent: 2002/0013687 (2002-01-01), Ortoleva
patent: 2002/0016679 (2002-02-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 2002/0053430 (2002-05-01), Curtis et al.
patent: 2002/0067373 (2002-06-01), Roe et al.
patent: 2002/0099505 (2002-07-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 2002/0100584 (2002-08-01), Couet et al.
patent: 2002/0120429 (2002-08-01), Ortoleva
patent: 2002/0169589 (2002-11-01), Banki et al.
patent: 2002/0169785 (2002-11-01), Netemeyer et al.
patent: 2002/0177955 (2002-11-01), Jalali et al.
patent: 2003/0033184 (2003-02-01), Benbassat et al.
patent: 2003/0149571 (2003-08-01), Francesco et al.
patent: 2003/0204434 (2003-10-01), Linton et al.
patent: 2003/0205378 (2003-11-01), Wellington et al.
patent: 2003/0209348 (2003-11-01), Ward et al.
patent: 2003/0220775 (2003-11-01), Jourdan et al.
patent: 2004/0020642 (2004-02-01), Vinegar et al.
patent: 2004/0034465 (2004-02-01), Spiesberger
patent: 2004/0039622 (2004-02-01), Masiello et al.
patent: 2004/0122640 (2004-06-01), Dusterhoft
patent: 2004/0174357 (2004-09-01), Cheung et al.
patent: 2004/0181422 (2004-09-01), Brand
patent: 2004/0220790 (2004-11-01), Cullick et al.
patent: 2004/0220846 (2004-11-01), Cullick et al.
patent: 2004/0236709 (2004-11-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 2005/0004833 (2005-01-01), McRae et al.
patent: 2005/0015231 (2005-01-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 2005/0149307 (2005-07-01), Gurpinar et al.
patent: WO 00/48022 (2000-08-01), None
patent: WO 01/62603 (2001-08-01), None
Sameer Joshi, William E. Brigham, Louis Castanier Techno—Economic and Risk Evaluation of a Thermal Recovery Project Work Performed Under Contract DE-FG22-93BC14899, Mar. 1996 Prepared for Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy.
Alexaner Egyed A Scenario-Driven Approach to Traceability 0-7695-1050-7/01, IEEE 2001.
Sheldon Gorell, Robert Bassett Trends in Reservoir Simulation: Big Models Scalable Models? Will you Please Make up Your Mind?, SPE 71596, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Sep. 2001 SPE Annual Conference and Exhibition.
“TERAS Evaluation Module User Guide”, Landmark Graphics Corporation, 2000, Part No. 157607 R98.7, 215 pages.
Floris et al., “Integrated Scenario and Probabilistic Analysis for Asset Decision Support” Petroleum Geoscience, vol. 8 2002, pp. 1-6.
Owen, Art, B., “Controlling Correlations in Latin Hypercube Samples”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Dec. 1994, vol. 89, No. 428, pp. 1517-1522.
Stein, Michael, “Large Sample Properties of Simulation Using Latin Hypercube Sampling”, Technometrics, May 1987, vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 143-151.
Begg, et al., “Improving Investment Deicision Using a Stochastic Integrated Asset Model”, Landmark Graphics Corporation, and J.M. Campbell, International Risk Management, SPE71414 16 pages.
Pallister, I & D. Pointing: “Asset Optimization Using Multiple Realizations and Streamline Simulation” Apr. 25, 2000, SPE 59460, XP-002261290.
Fassihi et al., “Risk Management for the Development of an Onshore Prospect” Mar. 20, 1999, SPE 52975, XP-02261289.
Reynolds, W., “Economic Analysis of Drilling Plans and Contractors by Use of Drilling Systems Approach” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Jul. 1986, pp. 787-793, XP-002261288.
Narayanan, et al., “Better Field Development Decisions from Multiscenario, Interdependent Reservoir, well, and Facility Simulations” Feb. 2003, SPE 79703.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Appln. No. PCT/US2004/013371, mailed Sep. 22, 2004.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/183,836, entitled “Method for monitoring and controlling drainage of a petroleum reservoir”, by Vidya Verma, filed Feb. 22, 2000.
Yarus, J.M., K. Yang, and K. Kramer; “Practical Workflows for Reservoir Modelling”; Geostatistical Rio 2000: Proceedings of the Geostatistics Sessions of the 31st International Geological Congress, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Aug. 6-17, 2000, p. 69-84.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for scenario and case decision management does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for scenario and case decision management, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for scenario and case decision management will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4247303

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.