Method and system for scaling network traffic managers using...

Multiplex communications – Data flow congestion prevention or control – Control of data admission to the network

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C370S401000, C370S395320, C709S227000, C709S238000, C718S105000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08004971

ABSTRACT:
A method and system is directed to distributing a flow of packets over a network to multiple traffic management devices. An apparatus receives each packet from a network and may act as a layer 2 switch, or router, to distribute the packet to one of a group of traffic management devices. The apparatus also may receive packets from servers for which the traffic management devices are managing communications. When distributing packets, a target traffic management device is selected from the group of traffic management devices. A connection key associated with the received packet and an identifier associated with the selected traffic management device are saved such that subsequent received packets in the flow of packets are delivered to the same traffic management device.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5884040 (1999-03-01), Chung
patent: 6064671 (2000-05-01), Killian
patent: 6157950 (2000-12-01), Krishnan
patent: 6173384 (2001-01-01), Weaver
patent: 6182146 (2001-01-01), Graham-Cumming, Jr.
patent: 6253230 (2001-06-01), Couland et al.
patent: 6330602 (2001-12-01), Law et al.
patent: 6359879 (2002-03-01), Carvey et al.
patent: 6424992 (2002-07-01), Devarakonda et al.
patent: 6493341 (2002-12-01), Datta et al.
patent: 6601084 (2003-07-01), Bhaskaran et al.
patent: 6651099 (2003-11-01), Dietz et al.
patent: 6665702 (2003-12-01), Zisapel et al.
patent: 6742045 (2004-05-01), Albert et al.
patent: 6775235 (2004-08-01), Datta et al.
patent: 6788692 (2004-09-01), Boudreau et al.
patent: 6792461 (2004-09-01), Hericourt
patent: 6792463 (2004-09-01), Lamberton et al.
patent: 6807179 (2004-10-01), Kanuri et al.
patent: 6832252 (2004-12-01), Cieslak et al.
patent: 6880089 (2005-04-01), Bommareddy et al.
patent: 6909713 (2005-06-01), Magnussen et al.
patent: 6980521 (2005-12-01), Jarvis
patent: 7010611 (2006-03-01), Wiryaman et al.
patent: 7020713 (2006-03-01), Shah et al.
patent: 7051066 (2006-05-01), Albert et al.
patent: 7065569 (2006-06-01), Teraslinna
patent: 7088710 (2006-08-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 7774473 (2010-08-01), Elving et al.
patent: 2002/0062372 (2002-05-01), Hong et al.
patent: 2002/0114326 (2002-08-01), Mahalingaiah
patent: 2002/0138618 (2002-09-01), Szabo
patent: 2003/0021230 (2003-01-01), Kuo et al.
patent: 2003/0229809 (2003-12-01), Wexler et al.
patent: 2004/0090919 (2004-05-01), Callon et al.
patent: 2005/0008017 (2005-01-01), Datta et al.
patent: 2005/0114186 (2005-05-01), Heinrich
“Amendment to Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications—Aggregation of Multiple Link Segments”, IEEE Std. 802.3ad-2000, Mar. 30, 2000, pp. 1-173.
Thaler, D., et al., “Multipath Issues in Unicast and Multicast Next-Hop Selection”, The Internet Society, Nov. 2000, pp. 1-9.
Hopps, C., “Analysis of an Equal-Cost Multi-Path Algorithm”, The Internet Society, Nov. 2000, pp. 1-8.
Moy, J., “OSPF Version 2”, The Internet Society, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-53.
Hewitt, John R. et al., “Securities Practice And Electronic Technology,” Corporate Securities Series (New York: Law Journal Seminars-Press) 1998, title page, bibliography page, pp. 4.29-4.30.
Reardon, Marguerite, “A Smarter Session Switch: Arrowpoint's CS Session Switches Boast The Brains Needed For E-Commerce,” Data Communications, Jan. 1999, title page, pp. 3, 5, 18.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/644,692, Official Communication mailed Oct. 30, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/469,843, Official Communication mail date Apr. 1, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/469,843, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 17, 2009.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 10/119,433, mailed Mar. 30, 2006.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 10/119,433, mailed Jun. 14, 2006.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 10/644,692, mailed May 18, 2007.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 10/644,692, mailed Feb. 26, 2008.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 11/469,843, mailed Feb. 1, 2010.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,603, mailed Aug. 25, 2009.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,603, mailed Feb. 16, 2010.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,567, mailed Oct. 7, 2010.
F5 Networks, Inc., Big/ip Controller Administrator Guide, Version 3.1, 2000.
F5 Networks, Inc., Big/ip. Controller Reference Guide, Version 3.1, 2000.
F5 Networks, Inc., Big/ip Controller Release Note, Version 3.1, Apr. 28, 2000 http://support,f5.com/kb/en-us/archived—products/big-ip/releasenotes/product/relnotes3—1.
Foundry Networks, Inc., Application Note: Firewall Load Balancing with Servertron, created Mar. 3, 2000 http://www.foundrynet.com/pdf/an-firewall-load-bal.pdf.
Foundry Networks, Inc., Foundry Products, http://www.foundrynet.com/appnotes, archived on May 10, 2000 http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20000510161749/http://wwvv.noundrynet.com/appnotes.
Wolf et al., Design Tradeoffs for Embedded Network Processors, Washington University in St. Louis, Jul. 10, 2000.
F5 Networks, Inc., BIG/ip Controller Getting Started Guide, Version 3.1, 2000.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,102,996, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,511, filed Dec. 13, 2010.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,697,427, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,509, filed Dec. 13, 2010.
Request far Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,395,349, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,510, filed Dec. 13, 2010.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,702,809, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,508, filed Dec. 13, 2010.
Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,511, mailed Jan. 31, 2011.
Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,510, mailed Feb. 4, 2011.
Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,508, mailed Feb. 14, 2011.
Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,509, mailed Feb. 14, 2011.
“Foundry Servertron Switch Firewall Load Balancing Guide,” Foundry Networks, Inc., Jun. 2003, 308 pgs.
Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.927 to Review the Examiner's Refusal to Order Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent. No. 7,102,996, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,511 filed Mar. 10, 2011.
Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.927 to Review the Examiner's Refusal to Order Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent. No. 7,395,349, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,510 filed Mar. 4, 2011.
Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.927 to Review the Examiner's Refusal to Order Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent. No. 7,702,809, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,508 filed Mar. 14, 2011.
Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.927 to Review the Examiner's Refusal to Order Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent. No. 7,697,427, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,509 filed Mar. 14, 2011.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for scaling network traffic managers using... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for scaling network traffic managers using..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for scaling network traffic managers using... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2720820

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.