Method and system for providing source/drain-gate spatial...

Active solid-state devices (e.g. – transistors – solid-state diode – Physical configuration of semiconductor – Mesa structure

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C257S344000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06646326

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to semiconductor devices, and more particularly to a method and system for controlling the spatial overlap between the source or drain and the gate.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A conventional semiconductor device typically includes a number of cells, each having a source, a drain, and at least one gate.
FIG. 1
depicts such a conventional semiconductor device
10
. The semiconductor device
10
includes a substrate
11
. The semiconductor device includes conventional cells
15
and
17
. The conventional cells
15
and
17
include conventional gates
20
and
26
, which are separated from the semiconductor substrate
11
by a tunneling barrier
13
. Although only a single conventional gate
20
and
26
is shown for each conventional cell
15
and
17
, respectively, each conventional cell
15
and
17
may have multiple conventional gates in a gate stack. The conventional gates
20
and
26
are typically formed of polysilicon. Also depicted in
FIG. 1
are conventional sources
12
and
16
and a conventional drain
14
. As depicted in
FIG. 1
, the conventional sources
12
and
16
and the conventional drain
14
each has a particular shape. The conventional sources
12
and
16
extend under and have a spatial overlap with the gates
20
and
26
, respectively. Similarly, the conventional drain
14
extends under and has a spatial overlap with the conventional gates
20
and
26
.
FIG. 2A
depicts a conventional method
50
for forming the conventional semiconductor device
10
. The method
50
depicted in
FIG. 2A
will be described in conjunction with
FIGS. 2B-2D
. Referring to the
FIGS. 2A-2D
, the tunneling barrier
13
is provided, via step
52
. The timing barrier
13
is typically a very thin insulator, often less than 100 Angstroms. In addition, the tunneling barrier
13
may be made of a nitride. Currently, either NO or N
2
O are often used. The conventional gates
20
and
26
are then provided, via step
54
. Step
54
typically includes providing a layer of polysilicon and then defining the conventional gates from the layer of polysilicon. The conventional gates are typically 1500-3000 Angstroms in thickness.
FIG. 2B
depicts the conventional semiconductor device
10
after the conventional gates
20
and
26
have been defined. An optional halo implant is then typically provided, via step
56
. The halo implant typically utilizes the dopants having the same conductivity type as the channel and, therefore, the underlying substrate. Thus, the halo implant has conductivity type as the opposite of the source
12
or
16
and the drain
14
. The halo implant is typically provided a high angle, so that will be under the gate and between the source and the drain for a particular memory cell. This angle is depicted by the direction of the arrows in FIG.
2
B.
A first conventional source and drain implant, for the extensions of the source and drain, is provided, via step
58
. The implant is typically and LDD implant. In some conventional methods
50
the dopant used in step
58
is phosphorus. Also step
58
, the first conventional source and drain implant is driven to ensure that the input extends over the desired area. However, typically the step drives the first source and drain implant under the gates. For example,
FIG. 2C
depicts the conventional semiconductor device
10
after the step
58
has been completed. The portions of the sources
12
and
16
and the portion of the drain
14
formed by the conventional first source and drain implant are depicted by areas
12
A,
14
A, and
16
A. These areas
12
A,
14
A and
16
A are shallow and extend under the conventional gates
20
and
26
. Thus, the portions of the areas
12
A,
14
A and
16
A that extend under the gates
20
and
26
are typically called the source extensions and drain extensions.
After the first conventional source and drain implants are provided and driven in step
58
, conventional spacers are provided, via step
60
. The conventional spacers
22
,
24
,
26
and
30
are typically on the order of five hundred to one thousand Angstroms in width. After the conventional spacers are provided in step
60
, a conventional source and drain implant is provided, via step
62
. The conventional source and drain implant provided in step
62
is typically arsenic and use the provided direction perpendicular to the surface of the conventional semiconductor device
10
. Because of the presence of the conventional spacers
22
,
24
,
26
and
30
, the dopant for conventional source and drain implants provided in step
62
is spaced apart from the gates
20
and
26
by the width of the spacers
22
,
24
,
26
and
30
. In other words, the dopant for the conventional source and drain implant typically starts out five hundred to one thousand Angstroms away from the conventional gates
20
and
26
. Thus, once the dopant for the conventional source and drain implant provided in step
62
is thermally cycled, the dopant is not driven under the conventional gates
20
and
26
.
FIG. 2D
depicts the conventional semiconductor device
10
after step
62
has been formed. The conventional sources
12
and
16
are depicted as having portions
12
A and
12
B and portions
16
A and
16
B, respectively. Similarly, the drain
14
is depicted as having portions
14
A and
14
B. The portions
12
B,
14
B and
16
B are formed in the conventional source and drain implant performed in step
62
. Thus, the portions
12
B,
14
B and
16
B are provided after formation of the conventional spacers
22
,
24
,
28
and
30
. As a result, the portions
12
B and
14
B and the portions
14
B and
16
B do not extend under the edges of the conventional gates
20
and
26
, respectively.
Although the method
50
can be used provided conventional semiconductor device
10
, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily realize that there several drawbacks to the conventional semiconductor device
10
so formed. The conventional sources
12
and
16
and the conventional drain
14
extend under the conventional gates
20
and
26
. In particular, the extensions of the portions
12
A and
14
A and the portions
14
A and
16
A extend under the conventional gates
20
and
26
, respectively. In general, the portions
12
A,
14
A and
16
A extend under each of the conventional gates
20
and
26
by approximately eighty to one hundred Angstroms. This spatial overlap between the gates
20
and
26
and the source
12
and
16
, respectively, and between the gates
20
and
26
and drain
14
causes several problems.
The spatial overlap between the sources
12
and
16
or the drain
14
in the gates
20
and
26
causes a increased power dissipation by the conventional cells
15
and
17
. A leakage current during the off state of the cells
15
and
17
is proportional to the area of spatial overlap between the gates
20
and
26
and the sources
12
and
16
or the drain
14
. This leakage current is due to the tunneling of charge carriers between the portions of the conventional sources
12
and
16
under the conventional gates
20
and
26
(i.e. the source and drain extensions) and conventional gates
20
and
26
and to tunneling between the portions of the conventional drain
14
under the conventional gates
20
and
26
the conventional gates
20
and
26
. The leakage current is particularly high for low bias devices. The leakage current can drastically increase the power consumed by the conventional semiconductor device
10
, which is undesirable.
The spatial overlap between the conventional sources of
12
and
16
and the conventional gates
20
and
26
and between the conventional drain
14
from the conventional gates
20
and
26
can also adversely affect the tunneling barrier
13
. Hot carrier injection at the overlap of the source
12
or
16
and the gate
20
or
26
or at the overlap of the drain
14
and the gate
20
or
26
causes stress in the tunnel barrier
13
. Consequently, the portion of the barrier
13
above the overlaps can be degraded.
The ov

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for providing source/drain-gate spatial... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for providing source/drain-gate spatial..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for providing source/drain-gate spatial... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3143261

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.