Method and system for processing the local return of...

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

08036905

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides a method and system for local return of a remotely purchased product. A guidelines-based validation and disposition decision process allows for a collection and disposition decision regarding a remotely purchased product to be made prior to returning the product to a remote retailer via an expensive shipping and handling process. By providing a dispersed method of disposition for returned product through online auction web sites, the returned product may be disposed of for consumers/partners one item at a time and the optimal financial return on the returned products may be captured.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5515447 (1996-05-01), Zheng et al.
patent: 5715314 (1998-02-01), Payne et al.
patent: 5715399 (1998-02-01), Bezos
patent: 5724424 (1998-03-01), Gifford
patent: 5727163 (1998-03-01), Bezos
patent: 5812668 (1998-09-01), Weber
patent: 5815657 (1998-09-01), Williams et al.
patent: 5828840 (1998-10-01), Cowan et al.
patent: 5848399 (1998-12-01), Burke
patent: 5850446 (1998-12-01), Berger et al.
patent: 5860068 (1999-01-01), Cook
patent: 5878139 (1999-03-01), Rosen
patent: 5889863 (1999-03-01), Weber
patent: 5899980 (1999-05-01), Wilf et al.
patent: 5937394 (1999-08-01), Wong et al.
patent: 5943424 (1999-08-01), Berger et al.
patent: 5960411 (1999-09-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 5963916 (1999-10-01), Kaplan
patent: 5963924 (1999-10-01), Williams et al.
patent: 5963949 (1999-10-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 5970469 (1999-10-01), Scroggie et al.
patent: 5978774 (1999-11-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 5983208 (1999-11-01), Haller et al.
patent: 5984508 (1999-11-01), Hurley
patent: 5987132 (1999-11-01), Rowney
patent: 5987140 (1999-11-01), Rowney et al.
patent: 5999924 (1999-12-01), Bair et al.
patent: 6002767 (1999-12-01), Kramer
patent: 6003024 (1999-12-01), Bair et al.
patent: 6006225 (1999-12-01), Bowman et al.
patent: 6015167 (2000-01-01), Savino et al.
patent: 6016480 (2000-01-01), Houvener et al.
patent: 6016484 (2000-01-01), Williams et al.
patent: 6018719 (2000-01-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 6029150 (2000-02-01), Kravitz
patent: 6085172 (2000-07-01), Junger
patent: 6188994 (2001-02-01), Egendorf
patent: 6192347 (2001-02-01), Graff
patent: 6246997 (2001-06-01), Cybul et al.
patent: 6269344 (2001-07-01), Junger
patent: 6321211 (2001-11-01), Dodd
patent: 6327576 (2001-12-01), Ogasawara
patent: 6453352 (2002-09-01), Wagner et al.
patent: 6497408 (2002-12-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6526393 (2003-02-01), Fredman
patent: 6536659 (2003-03-01), Hauser et al.
patent: 6547136 (2003-04-01), Sansone
patent: 6616189 (2003-09-01), Raming
patent: 6754637 (2004-06-01), Stenz
patent: 6757663 (2004-06-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 6865560 (2005-03-01), Sansone et al.
patent: 6974928 (2005-12-01), Bloom
patent: 6980962 (2005-12-01), Arganbright et al.
patent: 7062473 (2006-06-01), Taylor
patent: 7065492 (2006-06-01), Cinquini et al.
patent: 7197475 (2007-03-01), Lorenzen et al.
patent: 7376572 (2008-05-01), Siegel
patent: 2001/0011231 (2001-08-01), Junger
patent: 2001/0032141 (2001-10-01), Drattell
patent: 2001/0037207 (2001-11-01), Dejaeger
patent: 2001/0047315 (2001-11-01), Siegel
patent: 2002/0010634 (2002-01-01), Roman et al.
patent: 2002/0010689 (2002-01-01), Tibbs et al.
patent: 2002/0013744 (2002-01-01), Tsunenari et al.
patent: 2002/0019777 (2002-02-01), Schwab et al.
patent: 2002/0019785 (2002-02-01), Whitman
patent: 2002/0032573 (2002-03-01), Williams et al.
patent: 2002/0032612 (2002-03-01), Williams et al.
patent: 2002/0077976 (2002-06-01), Meyer et al.
patent: 2002/0082920 (2002-06-01), Austin et al.
patent: 2002/0083007 (2002-06-01), Sutherland et al.
patent: 2002/0095306 (2002-07-01), Smith et al.
patent: 2002/0133425 (2002-09-01), Pederson et al.
patent: 2002/0138356 (2002-09-01), Dutta et al.
patent: 2002/0152093 (2002-10-01), Chalmers et al.
patent: 2002/0178076 (2002-11-01), Ross
patent: 2002/0188531 (2002-12-01), Junger
patent: 2003/0023496 (2003-01-01), De Mol Van Otterloo et al.
patent: 2003/0061104 (2003-03-01), Thomson et al.
patent: 2003/0105704 (2003-06-01), Sundel
patent: 2003/0135432 (2003-07-01), McIntyre et al.
patent: 2003/0160097 (2003-08-01), Steiner
patent: 2004/0073435 (2004-04-01), Rosenbaum
patent: 2004/0078346 (2004-04-01), Amonette et al.
patent: 2004/0083179 (2004-04-01), Sesek et al.
patent: 2004/0128265 (2004-07-01), Holtz et al.
patent: 2004/0172260 (2004-09-01), Junger et al.
patent: 2005/0038758 (2005-02-01), Hilbush et al.
patent: 2005/0203809 (2005-09-01), Stone et al.
Petersen, Scot, “Online purchases: Easy to get, hard to return.” PC Week, Feb. 14, 2000.
U.S. Patent Application entitled Method and System Providing Out-Sourced Merchandise Return Services, Serial No. unknown; Inventors, unknown, 1999.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2001/0037247 A1 dated Nov. 1, 2001 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/804,586, filed Mar. 12, 2001 by Arthur S. Haseltine. Assignee: Enhance, Inc.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2001/0032143 A1 dated Oct. 18, 2001 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/752,980, filed Dec. 29, 2000 by Arthur S. Haseltine. Assignee: Enhance, Inc.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0128915 A1 dated Sep. 12, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/731,680, filed Dec. 6, 2000 by Arthur S. Haseltine. Assignee: Enhance, Inc.
UPS Autumn 2002 Forum, “The Far East is not so far,” 12259 UPS Forum. ENG/SPEC 4 pages, Oct. 17, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/659,465 entitled “Method and System Using Return Labels with Dynamically Generated Multiple Datapoint Coding”, filed by Edward J. Stashluk Jr. et al. on Sep. 10, 2003.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/750,935, inventor Philip S. Siegel, 9 pages, May 1, 2008.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/745,096, inventor Terry Combs, 10 pages, May 5, 2008.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/775,368, inventor Edward J. Stashluk Jr. et al., 16 pages, Jun. 12, 2008.
Machlis, “E-commerce=E-returns,” Computerworld, v31, n51, Abstract, 1 page, Dec. 22, 1997.
U.S. Postal Rate Commission, “Opinion and Recommended Decision Approving Revised Stipulation and Agreement,” 35 pages, May 14, 1998.
Goldblatt, “Stores, Online Retailers Prepare for Returns,” Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News, 1 page, Dec. 29, 1999.
“Cattron acquires Theimeg,” Modern Materials Handling, Boston, vol. 55, Iss. 11, 2 pages, Oct. 2000.
“J. Crew Selects Newgistics' ReturnValet Service for Managing Product,” Business Wire, 3 pages, Jan. 14, 2002.
“Carrier Route Definitions,” CarrierRoutes.com, 6 pages, 2006.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/775,368, Dec. 24, 2008.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/775,368, Aug. 19, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/775,368, Mar. 16, 2010.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/775,368, Aug. 5, 2010.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/775,368, Jan. 20, 2011.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,378, Sep. 16, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,378, Feb. 12, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/817,353, Nov. 19, 2008.
USPTO Examiner's Answer for U.S. Appl. No. 09/817,353, Sep. 3, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/745,096, Nov. 14, 2008.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/745,096, Aug. 24, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/745,096, Mar. 31, 2010.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/745,096, Oct. 29, 2010.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/745,096, Apr. 26, 2011.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/659,465, Apr. 3, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/659,465, Aug. 20, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/751,216, Oct. 23, 2008.
USPTO Examiner's Answer for . U.S. Appl. No. 10/751,216, Sep. 2, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/750,935, Nov. 18, 2008.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/750,935, Nov. 20, 2008.
USPTO Examiner's Answer for U.S. Appl. No. 10/750,935, Jul. 28, 2009.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for processing the local return of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for processing the local return of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for processing the local return of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4286811

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.