Method and system for multi-layer network routing

Multiplex communications – Network configuration determination

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C370S351000, C370S400000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10355306

ABSTRACT:
Each node of a telecommunications network determines a connection type attributes available for each signal type supported by the node. Each signal type represents a different connection routing layer within the telecommunications network. Adaptation costs involved in traversing from one connection routing layer to another connection routing layer in the node are calculated. The connection type attributes and adaptation costs are included in a link state advertisement broadcasted by each node in the telecommunications network. A route calculation is performed for a desired signal to determine a route through the telecommunications network for the signal. The route calculation takes into account the various connection type attributes, availability, and adaptation costs in determining the shortest route for the signal through the telecommunications network.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5995503 (1999-11-01), Crawley et al.
patent: 6363319 (2002-03-01), Hsu
patent: 6594268 (2003-07-01), Aukia et al.
patent: 6614785 (2003-09-01), Huai et al.
patent: 7161910 (2007-01-01), Maeno
patent: 2001/0033548 (2001-10-01), Saleh et al.
patent: 2002/0085498 (2002-07-01), Nakamichi et al.
patent: 1 146 682 (2001-10-01), None
patent: 1 152 631 (2001-11-01), None
Wayne D. Grover, et al., “Cycle-Oriented Distributed Preconfiguration: Ring-like Speed with Mesh-like Capacity for Self-Planning Network Restoration”, Proceedings of IEEE ICC'98, Atlanta, Georgia, Jun. 7-11, 1998, pp. 537-543.
J.W. Suurballe, et al., “A Quick Method for Finding Shortest Pairs of Disjoint Paths”, Networks, vol. 14 (1984), pp. 325-336.
Ramesh Bhandari, et al. “High Level Requirements for Optical Shared Mesh Restoration”, Internet Engineering Task Force, Nov. 2000, 5 unnumbered pages.
Wayne D. Grover, et al., “Cycle-Oriented Distributed Preconfiguration: Ring-like Speed with Mesh-like Capacity for Self-Organizing Proactive Network Restoration,” Presentation Slides, 9 unnumbered pages, ICC '98, Jun. 7-11, 1998 Atlanta, Georgia.
Mack-Crane, et al., “Enhancements to GMPLS Signaling for Optical Technologies”, AlterNIC—Network Information Center, pp. 1-15, http://www.alternic.org/drafts/drafts-m-n/draft-mack-crane-gmpls-signaling-enhancements.
Kompella, et al., “OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, AlterNIC—Network Information Center, pp. 1-13, http:// /www.alternic.org/drafts/drafts-k-l/draft-kompella -ospf-gmpls-extensions-00.html.
Papadimitriou, et al., “Generalized MPLS Architecture for Multi-Region Networks”, pp. 1-28, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-00.txt, Oct. 2002.
Mannie, et al., “Extensions to OSPF and IS—IS in support of MPLS for SDH/SONET Control”, AlterNIC—Network Information Center, pp. 1-25, file://C:/Documents%20 and %20Settings/CFISH/Local%20Settings/Temp/Temporar., Jul. 2000.
Mannie, et al., “GMPLS Extensions to OSPF and IS—IS for SONET/SDH Network Control”, CCamp Working Group, pp. 1-15, Jun. 2002.
Bernstein, “Interdomain optical routing”, Journal of Optical Networking, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 80-92, Feb. 2002.
Bernstein, “Framework for MPLS-Based Control of Optical SDH/SONET Networks” IEEE Network Jul./Aug. 2001, pp. 20-26.
Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Intermediate system to Intermediate system intra-domain routeing information exchange protocol for use in conjunction with the protocol for providing the connectionless-mode Network Service (ISO 8473), Reference Number ISO/IEC 10589:1992(E), International Standard, cover page + pp. 122-125, Jun. 15, 1992.
“Private Network—Network Interface Specification Version 1.0” (PNNI1.0), af-pnni-0055.000, The ATM Forum Technical Committee, Mar. 1996.
Coltun “The OSPF Opaque LSA Option”, Network Working Group, 13 unnumbered pages, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2370.txt?number=237, Jul. 1998.
Katz “Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF”, Network Working Group, 9 unnumbered pages, http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-katz-ospf-traffice 06.1.
Li, et al., “IS—IS extensions for Traffic Engineering”, Network Working Group, 11 unnumbered pages, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-traffic 0.4, Aug. 2001.
Kompella, et al., “Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, Network Working Group, 20 unnumbered pages, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing01.
Kompella, et al., “OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, CCAMP Working Group, 9 unnumbered pages, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions03.
Kompella, et al., “IS—IS Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, Network Working Group, 9 unnumbered pages, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-gmpls-extensions07.
Kompella, et al., “LSP Hierarchy with MPLS TE”, Network Working Group, 10 unnumbered pages, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts-draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-hierarchy-03.
Kompella, et al., “Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering”, 9 unnumbered pages, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-01.
Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, Application No. 03 737 577.1—1249; reference No. JL4475; dated May 22, 2007, 6 pages.
Mack-Crane, et al., “Enhancements to GMPLS Signaling for Optical Technologies”, AlterNIC—Network Information Center, pp. 1-15, http://www.alternic.org/drafts/drafts-m-n/draft-mack-crane-gmpls-signaling-enhancements, 2001.
Kompella, et al., “OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, AlterNIC—Network Information Center, pp. 1-13, http:// /www.alternic.org/drafts/drafts-k-l/draft-kompella -ospf-gmpls-extensions-00.html, May 2001.
Katz “Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF”, Network Working Group, 9 unnumbered pages, http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-katz-ospf-traffice 06.1, Oct. 2001.
Kompella, et al., “Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, Network Working Group, 20 unnumbered pages, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing01, Nov. 2001.
Kompella, et al., “OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, CCAMP Working Group, 9 unnumbered pages, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions03, Jan. 2002.
Kompella, et al., “IS—IS Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS”, Network Working Group, 9 unnumbered pages, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-gmpls-extensions07, Jan. 2002.
Kompella, et al., “LSP Hierarchy with MPLS TE”, Network Working Group, 10 unnumbered pages, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts-draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-hierarchy-03, May 2001.
Kompella, et al., “Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering”, 9 unnumbered pages, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-01, Nov. 2001.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for multi-layer network routing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for multi-layer network routing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for multi-layer network routing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3814359

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.