Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
2000-01-31
2004-03-09
Pardo, Thuy N. (Department: 2175)
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06704727
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method and system for generating a set of search terms in response to an input provided by a user. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and system for generating a set of search terms in response to an input provided by a user and a value score that is established for each search term.
Reference to Computer Program Listings Submitted on Compact Disk
A compact disk appendix is included containing computer program code listings pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 1.52(e) and is hereby incorporated by reference. The compact disk contains program code files in ASCII format. The total number of compact disks is 1 and the files included on the compact disk are as follows:
Creation
Creation
File Size
Date
Time
(Bytes)
File Name
01/30/2003
9:51 am
468,992
9623-164 Appendices A and B.doc
BACKGROUND
Search engines are commonly used to search the information available on computer networks such as the World Wide Web to enable users to locate information of interest that is stored within the network. To use a search engine, a user typically enters one or more search terms that the search engine uses to generate a listing of information, such as web pages, that the user is then able to access and utilize. The information resulting from the search is commonly identified as a result of an association that is established between the information and one or more of the search terms entered by the user. Different search engines use different techniques to associate information with search terms and to identify related information. These search engines also use different techniques to provide the identified information to the user. Accordingly, the likelihood of information being found as a result of a search varies depending upon the search engine used to perform the search.
This uncertainty is of particular concern to web page operators that make information available on the World Wide Web. In this setting, there are often several web page operators that are competing for the same group of potential views or customers. Accordingly, a web page's ability to be identified as the result of a search is often important to the success of a web page. Therefore, web page operators often seek to increase the likelihood that their web page will be seen as the result of a search.
One type of search engine that provides web page operators with a more predictable method of being seen as the result of a search is a “pay for performance” arrangement where web pages are displayed based at least in part upon a monetary sum that the web page owner has agreed to pay to the search engine operator. The web page operator agrees to pay an amount of money, commonly referred to as the bid amount, in exchange for a particular position in a set of search results that is generated in response to a user's input of a search term. A higher bid amount will result in a more prominent placement in a set of search results. Thus, a web page operator may attempt to place high bids on one or more search terms to increase the likelihood that their web page will be seen as a result of a search for that term. However, there are many similar search terms, and it is difficult for a web page operator to bid on every potentially relevant search term. Likewise, it is unlikely that a bid will be made on every search term. Accordingly, a search engine operator may not receive any revenue from searches performed using certain search terms for which there are no bids.
In addition, because the number of existing web pages is ever increasing, it is becoming more difficult for a user to find relevant search results. The difficulty of obtaining relevant search results is further increased because of the search engine's dependency on the search terms entered by the user. The search results that a user receives are directly dependent upon the search terms that the user enters. The entry of one search term may not result in relevant search results, while the entry of only a slightly different search term can result in relevant search results. Accordingly, the selection of search terms is often an important part of the search process. However, current search engines do not enable a search engine operator to provide specific search terms, such as those that will produce relevant search results, to a user. A system that overcomes these deficiencies is needed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a set of search terms is provided to a user in response to an input that is provided by the user. In response to the input, a first set of search terms is generated from a master set of search terms where a portion of each of the search terms in the first set match the input. A second set of search terms is then selected from the first set of search terms based upon a value score that is established for each search term. The value score can be established based, at least in part, upon how much revenue is generated by the search term. The second set of search terms can then be displayed to the user.
According to another embodiment of the invention, in response to input provided by the user, a first set of search terms is generated where the terms are associated with the input, but do not match the input. A second set of search terms is then selected from the first set of search terms based upon a value score that is established for each search term. The value score can be established based, at least in part, upon how much revenue is generated by the search term.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4290105 (1981-09-01), Cichelli et al.
patent: 5206949 (1993-04-01), Cochran et al.
patent: 5396624 (1995-03-01), Campbell, Jr.
patent: 5404507 (1995-04-01), Bohm et al.
patent: 5715444 (1998-02-01), Danish et al.
patent: 5742816 (1998-04-01), Barr et al.
patent: 5745894 (1998-04-01), Burrows et al.
patent: 5752051 (1998-05-01), Cohen
patent: 5778367 (1998-07-01), Wesinger, Jr. et al.
patent: 5802515 (1998-09-01), Adar et al.
patent: 5819259 (1998-10-01), Duke-Moran et al.
patent: 5862223 (1999-01-01), Walker et al.
patent: 5926811 (1999-07-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5995979 (1999-11-01), Cochran
patent: 6006225 (1999-12-01), Bowman et al.
patent: 6012053 (2000-01-01), Pan et al.
patent: 6032145 (2000-02-01), Beall et al.
patent: 6070158 (2000-05-01), Kirsch et al.
patent: 6233575 (2001-05-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6269361 (2001-07-01), Davis et al.
patent: 6285987 (2001-09-01), Roth et al.
patent: 6308176 (2001-10-01), Bagshaw
patent: 6405197 (2002-06-01), Gilmour
Shneiderman, “A Framework for Search Interfaces”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 18-20.*
Press Release article titled “GoTo.com Announces First round of Financing, Totaling More Than $6 Million, Led by Draper, Fisher Jurvetson”,Business Wire, dated May 19, 1998, printed from the Internet at <http://www.dialogclassic.com/main.vingw> on Nov. 9, 2000, 2 pages.
Ubois, Jeff, article titled “He who pays the piper . . . ”,MIDRANGE Systems, vol. 9, No. 12, 1996, p. 50 (1), reprinted by Cardinal Business Media, Inc.
News of The Week articles,Telephony, May 1, 1995, pp. 8 and 10.
Nuts 'N Bolts articles,Target Marketing, Oct. 1997, 1 page.
DoubleClick Testlt!, obtained at the internet address: http://web.archive.org/web/19980205034316/www.doubleclick.com
f/adinfo/testiset.htm, dated Oct. 16, 2002, 4 pages.
DoubleClick Frequently Asked Questions, obtained at the internet address: http://web.archive.org/web/19980205033925/www.doubleclick.com
f/adinfo/facts.htm, dated Oct. 16, 2002, 5 pages.
“New Service Puts Ad Auction, Search Engine Under One Roof”, article from Electronic Advertising & Marketplace Report,Simba Information, Inc. Apr. 28, 1998, 2 pages.
Google Search, communication from Jeffrey Brewer at Jeffrey@goto.com, titled “Need reverse stemming software”, dated May 27, 1998, obtained at the internet address: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=356CEE4A8DE882A8%40goto.com, on Dec. 19, 2002, 1 page.
Ketchpel, Steven P. et al. “U-PAI: A Universal Payment Application Interface”, conferenc
Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione
Overture Services Inc.
Pardo Thuy N.
LandOfFree
Method and system for generating a set of search terms does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and system for generating a set of search terms, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for generating a set of search terms will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3236846