Data processing: vehicles – navigation – and relative location – Vehicle control – guidance – operation – or indication – Railway vehicle
Reexamination Certificate
2002-05-31
2004-03-02
Cuchlinski, Jr., William A (Department: 3661)
Data processing: vehicles, navigation, and relative location
Vehicle control, guidance, operation, or indication
Railway vehicle
C701S200000, C073S179000, C246S00100C, C246S12200A
Reexamination Certificate
active
06701228
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to railroads generally, and more particularly to a system and method for determining wheel size to compensate for wheel wear.
2. Discussion of the Background
Controlling the movement of trains in a modern environment is a complex process. Collisions with other trains must be avoided and regulations in areas such as grade crossings must be complied with. The pressure to increase the performance of rail systems, in terms of speed, reliability and safety, has led to many proposals to automate various aspects of train operation. For example, positive train control (PTC) and automatic train control (ATC) systems have been widely discussed in recent years.
Some automated systems rely on global positioning system (GPS) receivers for indications of train speed and position (as used herein, “global positioning system” and “GP S” refer to all varieties of global positioning system receivers, including, but not limited to, differential global positioning system receivers. Still other systems use inertial navigation systems (INSs) for determining speed and location. However, GPS receivers and INSs sometimes fail, and for that reason it is desirable to have a back-up system.
One method that can be used in case of a positioning system failure is to measure the rotation of motor, axle or wheel rotation to determine the speed at which a train is traveling and/or the distance which a train has traveled. Each time the wheel makes a compete revolution, the distance traveled by the wheel is equal to its circumference in the absence of any slippage. Thus, if the radius R of the wheel is known, the distance traveled for each revolution of the wheel is equal to 2&pgr;R. However, the radius of a wheel changes over time due to wheel wear. For example, a standard train wheel can decrease in size from 40 inches to 36 inches over its useful life. Therefore, the distance traveled in each wheel revolution can vary between 125.7″ and 113.1″, a difference of approximately 12.6″ or 10%. This error is significant.
What is needed is a method and system that compensates for wheel wear.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention meets the aforementioned need to a great extent by providing a method and system for compensating for wheel wear in which wheel rotation information from a revolution counter or a tachometer and position and/or speed information from an independent positioning system such as GPS or INS are measured over a predetermined distance and used to determine the size of the train wheels. This process is performed periodically to compensate for wheel wear.
In one aspect of the invention, the system includes a map database and the position information from the independent positioning system is used to as an index to ensure that the rotation data used for the speed/position comparison between the position system and rotation data is collected in an area of straight and flat track so as to exclude errors in the rotation data caused by wheel slippage and turns.
In another aspect of the invention, the data used for the comparison between the speeds/distances indicated by the positioning system and by the rotation data is collected over a long distance to minimize known errors in the positioning system.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4181943 (1980-01-01), Mercer, Sr. et al.
patent: 4208717 (1980-06-01), Rush
patent: 4459668 (1984-07-01), Inoue et al.
patent: 4561057 (1985-12-01), Haley, Jr. et al.
patent: 4711418 (1987-12-01), Aver, Jr. et al.
patent: 5072900 (1991-12-01), Malon
patent: 5129605 (1992-07-01), Burns et al.
patent: 5177685 (1993-01-01), Davis et al.
patent: 5332180 (1994-07-01), Peterson et al.
patent: 5340062 (1994-08-01), Heggestad
patent: 5364047 (1994-11-01), Petit et al.
patent: 5394333 (1995-02-01), Kao
patent: 5398894 (1995-03-01), Pascoe
patent: 5452870 (1995-09-01), Heggestad
patent: 5533695 (1996-07-01), Heggestad et al.
patent: 5620155 (1997-04-01), Michalek
patent: 5699986 (1997-12-01), Welk
patent: 5740547 (1998-04-01), Kull et al.
patent: 5751569 (1998-05-01), Metel et al.
patent: 5791425 (1998-08-01), Kamen et al.
patent: 5794730 (1998-08-01), Kamen
patent: 5803411 (1998-09-01), Ackerman et al.
patent: 5828979 (1998-10-01), Polivka et al.
patent: 5867122 (1999-02-01), Zahm et al.
patent: 5931882 (1999-08-01), Fick et al.
patent: 5944768 (1999-08-01), Ito et al.
patent: 5947423 (1999-09-01), Clifton et al.
patent: 5950966 (1999-09-01), Hungate et al.
patent: 5971091 (1999-10-01), Kamen et al.
patent: 5978718 (1999-11-01), Kull
patent: 5995881 (1999-11-01), Kull
patent: 6049745 (2000-04-01), Douglas et al.
patent: 6081769 (2000-06-01), Curtis
patent: 6102340 (2000-08-01), Peek et al.
patent: 6135396 (2000-10-01), Whitfield et al.
patent: 6179252 (2001-01-01), Roop et al.
patent: 6218961 (2001-04-01), Gross et al.
patent: 6220987 (2001-04-01), Robichaux et al.
patent: 6311109 (2001-10-01), Hawthorne et al.
patent: 6322025 (2001-11-01), Colbert et al.
patent: 6345233 (2002-02-01), Erick
patent: 6360165 (2002-03-01), Chowdhary
patent: 6371416 (2002-04-01), Hawthorne
patent: 6373403 (2002-04-01), Korver et al.
patent: 6374184 (2002-04-01), Zahm et al.
patent: 6377877 (2002-04-01), Doner
patent: 6397147 (2002-05-01), Whithead
patent: 6421587 (2002-07-01), Diana et al.
patent: 6434466 (2002-08-01), Robichaux et al.
patent: 6456937 (2002-09-01), Doner et al.
patent: 6459964 (2002-10-01), Vu et al.
patent: 6459965 (2002-10-01), Polivka et al.
patent: 6487478 (2002-11-01), Azzaro et al.
“Testimony of Jolene M. Molitoris, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation before the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Railroads”, Federal Railroad Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Apr. 1, 1998.
“System Architecture, ATCS Specification 100”, May 1995.
“A New World for Communications & Signaling”, Progressive Railroading, May 1986.
“Advanced Train Control Gain Momentum”, Progressive Railroading, Mar. 1986.
“Railroads Take High Tech in Stride”, Progressive Railroading, May 1985.
Lyle, Denise, “Positive Train Control on CSXT”, Railway Fuel and Operating Officers Association, Annual Proceedings, 2000.
Lindsey, Ron A., “C B T M, Communications Based Train Management”, Railway Fuel and Operating Officers Association, Annual Proceedings, 1999.
Moody, Howard G, “Advanced Train Control Systems A System to Manage Railroad Operations”, Railway Fuel and Operating Officers Association, Annual Proceedings, 1993.
Ruegg, G.A., “Advanced Train Control Systems ATCS”, Railway Fuel and Operating Officers Association, Annual Proceedings, 1986.
Malone, Frank, “The Gaps Start to Close”Progressive Railroading, May 1987.
“On the Threshold of ATCS”, Progressive Railroading, Dec. 1987.
“CP Advances in Train Control”, Progressive Railroading, Sep. 1987.
“Communications/Signaling: Vital for dramatic railroad advances”, Progressive Railroading, May 1988.
“ATCS's System Engineer”, Progressive Railroading, Jul. 1988.
“The Electronic Railroad Emerges”, Progressive Railroading, May 1989.
“C3Comes to the Railroads”, Progressive Railroading, Sep. 1989.
“ATCS on Verge of Implementation”, Progressive Railroading, Dec. 1989.
“ATCS Envolving on Railroads”, Progressive Railroading, Dec. 1992.
“High Tech Advances Keep Railroads Rolling”, Progressive Railroading, May 1994.
“FRA Promotes Technology to Avoid Train-To-Train Collisions”, Progressive Railroading, Aug. 1994.
“ATCS Moving slowly but Steadily from Lab for Field”, Progressive Railroading, Dec. 1994.
Judge, T., “Electronic Advances Keeping Railroads Rolling”, Progressive Railroading, Jun. 1995.
“Electronic Advances Improve How Railroads Manage”, Progressive Railroading, Dec. 1995.
Judge, T., “BNSF/UP PTS Pilot Advances in Northwest”, Progressive Railroading, May 1996.
Foran, P., “Train Control Quandry, Is CBTC viable? Railroads, Suppliers Hope Pilot Projects Provide Clues”, Progressive Railroading, Jun. 1997.
“PTS Would've Prevented Silver Spring Crash: NTSB”, Progressive Railroading, Jul. 1997.
Fo
Hickenlooper Harrison Thomas
Kane Mark Edward
Shockley James Francis
Cuchlinski, Jr. William A
Hernandez Olga
Kelber Steven B.
Piper Rudnick LLP
Quantum Engineering Inc.
LandOfFree
Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3230124