Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as...

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S007380, C705S002000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06895385

ABSTRACT:
A method and system for ascribing a reputation of an entity as a rater of other entities is provided. A first rating indicative of a rating of a rated entity by the first entity, and one or more second ratings, each second rating indicative of a rating of the rated entity provided by another entity, are provided. The second ratings are combined to produce a first combined rating. The first rating is compared to the first combined rating to produce a first rating predictability of the first rating, the first rating predictability being a negative function of a magnitude of a difference between the first rating and the first combined rating. A resulting rater reputation is generated based at least in part on the first rating predictability.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4870579 (1989-09-01), Hey
patent: 4996642 (1991-02-01), Hey
patent: 5550746 (1996-08-01), Jacobs
patent: 5732400 (1998-03-01), Mandler et al.
patent: 5768142 (1998-06-01), Jacobs
patent: 6073117 (2000-06-01), Oyanagi et al.
patent: 6112186 (2000-08-01), Bergh et al.
patent: 6249785 (2001-06-01), Paepke
patent: 6275811 (2001-08-01), Ginn
patent: 6347332 (2002-02-01), Malet et al.
patent: 6362837 (2002-03-01), Ginn
patent: 6487541 (2002-11-01), Aggarwal et al.
patent: 6708155 (2004-03-01), Honarvar et al.
patent: 20010034631 (2001-10-01), Kiselik
Moukas, Guttman and Maes—Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: An MIT Media Laboratory Perspective.*
Priluck, Jill. MIT: E-Commerce Just Beginning—HISTOS allows buyers to rate sellers and vice versa.*
Moukas, Guttman, Zacharias and Maes—Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: An MIT Media Laboratory Perspective. From ICEC98 Submission. http://moux.www.media.mit.edu/people/moux/.*
Zacharia, Giorgos et al. Collaborative Reputation Mechanisms in Electronic Marketplaces. Proceedings of the 32ndHawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Jan. 1999.*
N. Cesa-Bianchi, et al., “How to Use Expert Advice”, Journal of the ACM, vol. 44(3), pp. 427-485, May 1997.
C. Dellarocas, “Immunizing Online Reputation Reporting Systems Against Unfair Ratings and Discriminatory Behavior”, Proceedings of the 2ndACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Minn. MN, Oct. 17-20, 2000.
J. Donath et al., “Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community”, 1998, pp. 1-32.
EBay Services: The Feedback Forum; http://pages.ebay.com/services/forum/feedback.html.
Epinions.com—FAQs: The Web of Trust, http://www.epinions.com/help/faq.
Y. Freund, et al., “Using and Combining Predictors that Specialize”, in Twentyninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1995.
E.J. Friedman et al, The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms: Fostering Cooperation in the Internet, Proceedings of the 1998 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference.
L. E. Foner, “Yenta: A Multi-Agent, Referral-Based Matchmaking System”, First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents'97), Feb. , 1997.
E. Glickman, Paired Comparison Models with Time-Varying Parameters, Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, May 1993.
M. Herbster et al., “Tracking the Best Expert”, Journal of Machine Learning, vol. 32(2), Aug. 1998.
Internet Content Rating Association, web pages at http:/www.rsac.org., Sep. 17, 2001.
R. Khare et al., “Weaving a Web of Trust”, Summer of 1997, Issue of the World Wide Web Journal, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 77-112.
P. Kollock, “The Production of Trust in Online Markets, Advances in Group Processes”, vol. 16, 1999.
H. Madsen et al., “Lecture Notes in Non-Linear and Non-stationary Times Series Analysis”, Institute of Mathematical Modelling (IMM), 1998, Chapter 9, pp. 193-208.
S. P. Marsh, “Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling, Apr. 1994.
J. M. Reagle, Jr., “Trust in a Cyptographic Economy and Digital Security Deposits: Protocols and Policies”, Master Thesis, MIT, May 1996.
P. Resnick, et al., “GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews”, Proceedinds of ACM 1994 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175-186.
P. Resnick et al., “Trust Among Strangers in Internet Transaction: Empirical Analysis of eBay's Reputation System”, Working Paper for the NBER Workshop on Empirical Studies of Electronic Commerce, pp. 1-26.
U. Shardanand et al., “Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating “Word of Mouth””, Proceedings of the CHI-95 Conference, Denver, CO. May 1995, pp. 1-12.
G. Zacharia et al., “Dynamic Pricing in a Reputation-Brokered Agent-Mediated Marketplace”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, Special Issue on Agents, Vol. 9, (4) pp. 271-286, Dec. 2000.
G. Zacharia, “Collaborative Reputation Mechanisms for Online Communities”, MIT Program of Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning, Aug. 6, 1999.
MyFICO—Your Source for Credit Scoring, web pages at http://www.myfico.com, Sep. 5, 2001.
Better Business Bureau, Fairness in the Marketplace, web pages at http://search.bbb.org, Sep. 5, 2001.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3366433

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.