Method and system for analyzing ditigal audio files

Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Digital audio data processing system

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S737000, C706S012000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07853344

ABSTRACT:
A method and system for analyzing audio files is provided. Plural audio file feature vector values based on an audio file's content are determined and the audio file feature vectors are stored in a database that also stores other pre-computed audio file features. The process determines if the audio files feature vectors match the stored audio file vectors. The process also associates a plurality of known attributes to the audio file.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4677466 (1987-06-01), Lert et al.
patent: 4843562 (1989-06-01), Kenyon et al.
patent: 5210820 (1993-05-01), Kenyon
patent: 5432852 (1995-07-01), Leighton et al.
patent: 5473759 (1995-12-01), Slaney et al.
patent: 5612729 (1997-03-01), Ellis et al.
patent: 5825830 (1998-10-01), Kopf
patent: 5862260 (1999-01-01), Rhoads
patent: 5918223 (1999-06-01), Blum et al.
patent: 5960388 (1999-09-01), Nishiguchi et al.
patent: 5987525 (1999-11-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6061680 (2000-05-01), Scherf et al.
patent: 6154773 (2000-11-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6161132 (2000-12-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6201176 (2001-03-01), Yourlo
patent: 6230192 (2001-05-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6230207 (2001-05-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6240459 (2001-05-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6304523 (2001-10-01), Jones et al.
patent: 6321200 (2001-11-01), Casey
patent: 6330593 (2001-12-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6434520 (2002-08-01), Kanevsky et al.
patent: 6453252 (2002-09-01), Laroche
patent: 6463433 (2002-10-01), Baclawski
patent: 6505160 (2003-01-01), Levy et al.
patent: 6512796 (2003-01-01), Sherwood
patent: 6539395 (2003-03-01), Gjerdingen et al.
patent: 6570991 (2003-05-01), Scheirer et al.
patent: 6571144 (2003-05-01), Moses et al.
patent: 6657117 (2003-12-01), Weare et al.
patent: 6675174 (2004-01-01), Bolle et al.
patent: 6826350 (2004-11-01), Kashino et al.
patent: 6829368 (2004-12-01), Meyer et al.
patent: 6963975 (2005-11-01), Weare
patent: 2002/0087565 (2002-07-01), Hoekman et al.
patent: 2002/0101989 (2002-08-01), Markandey et al.
patent: 2003/0028796 (2003-02-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 2003/0046283 (2003-03-01), Roberts
patent: 2003/0086341 (2003-05-01), Wells et al.
patent: 2003/0135513 (2003-07-01), Quinn et al.
patent: 2004/0074378 (2004-04-01), Allamanche et al.
patent: 2004/0143349 (2004-07-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 2004/0172411 (2004-09-01), Herre et al.
patent: 2004/0267522 (2004-12-01), Allamanche et al.
patent: 2005/0017879 (2005-01-01), Linzmeier et al.
patent: 99/30488 (1999-06-01), None
patent: 01/20483 (2001-03-01), None
patent: 01/37465 (2001-05-01), None
patent: 02/065782 (2002-08-01), None
patent: 02/077966 (2002-10-01), None
patent: 02/093823 (2002-11-01), None
patent: 03/067466 (2003-08-01), None
patent: 03/096337 (2003-11-01), None
patent: 2004/044820 (2004-05-01), None
patent: 2004/077430 (2004-09-01), None
patent: 2004/081817 (2004-09-01), None
Tzanetaski, G., “Multifeature Audio Segmentation for Browing and Annotation”, pp. W99-1-W99-4; Proc. 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, New Paltz, New York, Oct. 17-20, 1999.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, “First Amended Complaint for 1. Breach of Contracts, 2. Unfair Competition, 3. Trademark Infringement, 4. International Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage, 5. Negligent Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage, 6. Patent Infringement, Demand for Jury Trial”,Gracenote, Inc. v.MusicMatch, Inc., No. C 02-3162 CW, 08/21/022, 33 pages.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Dismissal of Adeptec, Inc.”,CDDB, Inc. dba Gracenotv.Adaptec, Inc., and Roxio, Inc., No. C-01 20428 JW, Dec. 31, 2001, 3 pages.
U.S. District court, Northern District of California, “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Dismissal of Roxio, Inc. and Gracenote”,CDDB, Inc. dba Gracenotev.Adaptec, Inc., and Roxio, Inc., No. C-01 20428 JW, Dec. 31, 2001, 5 pages.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, “Order Addressing Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Patent Infringement”,Gracenote, Inc. v.MusicMatch, Inc., No. C-02 3162 CW, Aug. 26, 2004, 25 pages.
R. Venkatesan, S.M. Koon, M.H. Jakubowski and P. Moulin, “Robust Image Hashing” , ICIP'00-IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Vancouver, Sep. 10-13, 2000.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and system for analyzing ditigal audio files does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and system for analyzing ditigal audio files, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and system for analyzing ditigal audio files will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4181067

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.