Data processing: vehicles – navigation – and relative location – Vehicle control – guidance – operation – or indication – Indication or control of braking – acceleration – or deceleration
Reexamination Certificate
2002-09-13
2004-06-29
Marc-Coleman, Marthe Y. (Department: 3661)
Data processing: vehicles, navigation, and relative location
Vehicle control, guidance, operation, or indication
Indication or control of braking, acceleration, or deceleration
C701S093000, C180S179000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06757605
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
German Published Patent Application No. 199 49 286 describes a device for regulating at least one vehicle motion variable describing a motion of a vehicle. To this end, the device contains regulator means with which actuators are triggered for regulating the vehicle motion variable. Furthermore, the device contains determination means with which a bad stretch of road variable, which describes the vehicle's drive on a stretch of bad road, is determined. The regulator means is influenced as a function of the bad stretch of road variable, such that the sensitivity of the regulator means is adapted to the vehicle's drive on a stretch of bad road. European Patent No. 0 339 056 describes a method of regulating the stability of a vehicle in traveling along a curve, where the vehicle speed and the coefficient of friction between the tires and the road are determined. In this method, the steering angle and the rate of rotation of the vehicle about the vertical axis (yaw rate) are also determined, and a lower limit value characteristic of the yaw rate is determined as a function of the steering angle, taking into account the vehicle speed and the coefficient of friction. The brake pressure is reduced when the measured yaw rate drops below the limit value characteristic. German Published Patent Application No. 199 64 032 describes a method and a device for stabilizing a vehicle. In this method, a transverse dynamics variable which describes the transverse dynamics of the vehicle is regulated to stabilize the vehicle. The transverse dynamics variable is regulated by limiting the float angle of the vehicle to a predetermined value. Regulation of the transverse dynamics variable is altered by input by the driver to allow a larger float angle than the predetermined value.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In vehicle dynamics control (VDC) systems (ESP=electronic stability program), the driver selects a desired driving performance by selecting the steering angle. A setpoint for the yaw rate is calculated as a function of the steering angle, the transverse acceleration and the longitudinal speed of the vehicle. If the measured yaw rate does not match the calculated setpoint yaw rate, the vehicle dynamics controller will attempt to adapt the yaw rate to the setpoint, e.g., through changes in brake pressure on the individual wheels or through active steering operations. The phase shift between the change in the steering angle and the change in the yaw rate due to the inherent dynamics of the vehicle is taken into account through suitable filters. It is desirable, especially with certain sporty vehicles, to tolerate an admissible system deviation between the setpoint yaw rate and the actual yaw rate in many cases. Suitable measures are performed to suppress the vehicle controller intervention measures in these cases.
With the known implementations, it is impossible to allow greater permanent system deviations between the yaw rate setpoint and the actual yaw rate depending on the situation. Thus, in the case of front-wheel-drive vehicles, for example, it is impossible to steer back in coming out of a turn on a smooth road surface and to straighten out the vehicle again slowly merely by accelerating without any active braking intervention by the vehicle dynamics controller. However, that is precisely what is often desired in the case of sporty vehicles. Stabilizing measures should be taken only when the driver must definitely countersteer (“countersteering” means that the steering angle is rotated in the opposite direction, past the zero position) or when the float angle of the vehicle increases. If the driver steers back only slightly (“steering back” means that the steering angle is reduced but is not rotated in the other direction, past the zero position), then the regulator should assume the stabilization function and should intervene with full sensitivity. If the driver steers back forcefully, this is sufficient with a suitably tuned vehicle to straighten the vehicle out even without a braking intervention measure. It is thus important to prevent the stabilization measure on the part of the driver (due to steering back forcefully) to be superimposed on that of the regulator (through a braking intervention measure on the front wheel which is on the outside of the turn, for example), in which case the stabilization may subjectively appear to be too intense. The present invention described here opens up the possibility of expanding the known vehicle dynamics control (VDC, ESP) in the manner described above.
The present invention relates to a device for regulating at least one controlled variable of vehicle dynamics which describes a motion of a vehicle, the device
containing the determination means with which at least one vehicle dynamics variable is determined, and
containing regulator means for triggering actuators for regulating the at least one vehicle dynamics controlled variable, the sensitivity of the regulator means being influenceable.
The advantage of the present invention is that the sensitivity of the regulator means in at least one operating state of the vehicle is influenced by at least one of the vehicle dynamics variables thus determined.
The vehicle dynamics variables determined by the determination means may, of course, also include the vehicle dynamics controlled variables.
An advantageous embodiment of the present invention is characterized in that at least one transverse acceleration variable and one steering angle variable are determined as vehicle dynamics variables by the determination means, and the sensitivity of the regulator means is influenced
when the operating state is driving with a transverse acceleration of the vehicle different from zero and driver-operated steering against the direction of transverse acceleration or
when the vehicle is oversteered as the operating state and is traveling with a transverse acceleration of the vehicle different from zero, and driver-operated steering is occurring in the direction of transverse acceleration.
Another advantageous embodiment of the present invention is characterized in that at least one transverse acceleration variable and one steering angle variable are determined by the determination means as vehicle dynamics variables, and the sensitivity of the regulator means is influenced
when the operating state of the vehicle is traveling with a transverse acceleration which is different from zero and driver-operated steering is occurring against the direction of transverse acceleration, or
when the operating state of the vehicle is an oversteered state and the vehicle is traveling with a transverse acceleration which is different from zero and driver-operated steering is occurring in the direction of transverse acceleration, the oversteered state being defined in particular by the actual yaw rate exceeding the setpoint yaw rate in absolute value.
It is also possible to define the term “oversteering” as follows: oversteering is when the tire slip angle on the rear axle increases more rapidly than the tire slip angle on the front axle with an increase in transverse acceleration.
In an advantageous embodiment, the present invention is characterized in that two different vehicle dynamics variables thus determined are compared, and the sensitivity of the regulator means is influenced differently, depending on the outcome of this comparison.
Another advantageous embodiment is characterized in that
at least the steering angle and the transverse acceleration are determined by the determination means as vehicle dynamics variables, and
the plus or minus signs of the steering angle and the transverse acceleration are compared in this comparison.
It is advantageous if the vehicle dynamics variables thus determined include at least one measured yaw rate and one yaw rate determined by a mathematical model in particular.
An advantageous embodiment is characterized in that
the vehicle dynamics variables thus determined also include the transverse acceleration and the longitudinal speed of the vehicle, and
the
Kenyon & Kenyon
Marc-Coleman Marthe Y.
Robert & Bosch GmbH
LandOfFree
Method and device for situation-dependent and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and device for situation-dependent and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and device for situation-dependent and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3359579