Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system – Measured signal processing
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-26
2003-04-29
Wachsman, Hal (Department: 2857)
Data processing: measuring, calibrating, or testing
Measurement system
Measured signal processing
C702S194000, C340S511000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06556957
ABSTRACT:
The invention relates to a method for detection of an alarm state and to the detection of drifts, jumps and/or outliers of measurement signal values received via measurement value sampling means, respectively, wherein an alarm state is triggered if for a currently received measurement signal value or for a value derived from the measurement values, respectively, a pre-determined limit value or pre-determined interval boundaries is or are passed, respectively. As examples for the extremely numerous applications of the method according to the invention, in particular, in the field of medicine the peri-operative monitoring, the monitoring of vital parameters in emergency rooms, the sleep monitoring, CTG (cardio-tocography) and in other fields fire and smoke warning systems, acoustic monitoring systems, such as baby phones, are mentioned.
Alarm systems for monitoring in the field of emergence medicine which typically display online and analyze heart-circulation-parameters (ECG, blood pressure), oxygen saturation (SpO2), gas exchange and metabolism parameters, as well as EEG and EMG, shall direct the attention of the treating medical doctor or nurse to potentially life threatening conditions of the monitored patient. An ideal alarm system would be characterized by the following properties which are all not optimally realized with the prior art:
1. Low rate of false alarms in order to avoid the undesired effect of getting used to the alarm situation and in order to counteract the tendency to deactivate the alarm which is often felt quite embarrassing.
2. Short delay times between the start of a critical situation and the triggering of the alarm in order to ensure a time advance for therapeutic measures which can under certain circumstances be life saving.
3. A high degree of adaptive performance in order to avoid that too many parameters have to be manually pre-set and re-adjusted during the treatment and distract, therefore, from the actual monitoring task. In particular, several subsequent alarm situations which have certain time differences shall be able to be recognized.
4. A high degree of information contents of the adjustable parameters in order to ensure that the alarm system can easily be operated without errors.
5. Simplicity as much as possible and, therefore, calculation speed as high as possible in order to avoid heavy calculations which would only be possible with expensive processors and storage elements in order to avoid possible restrictions regarding calculation time.
6. A high information contents in order to enable differentiated reactions.
7. Integrated detection of outliers in order to enable differentiation or distinction between life threatening states, failure of the apparatus or the supply lines and false measurements.
8. Clear decision rules in order to ensure the possibility for exportation and to enable a retrospective analysis and parameter correction.
Current alarm systems in the field of emergence medicine have a rate of false alarms of 70% to 99.5% dependent on the physiologic parameter which is monitored. The high rate of false alarms leads to a de-sensibilization of the monitoring staff and to often manually deactivating the alarm. The known alarm systems are triggered when the parameter to be monitored exceeds pre-set upper and lower thresholds, respectively. Such alarm systems are referred to as threshold value alarm systems. In order to lower the rate of false alarms the upper limit must be chosen rather high and the lower limit must be chosen rather low which unavoidably leads to larger time delays in situations which require an alarm. Furthermore, such an all-or-nothing system does not corresponded to the ISO standard which proposes an alarming system comprising several stages with different warning degrees.
As regards the known threshold alarm system an upper and a lower threshold value is predefined for a fluctuating signal, wherein an alarm is triggered when the signal moves out of the interval defined by the threshold values. The threshold value alarm has the following drawbacks. It is instable against outliers. It is not adaptive, i. e. the limiting values must be manually set and, in particular, regarding a signal comprising a drift, e.g. caused by a time variation of the detector sensitivity, it has to be permanently readjusted. If the limits of the threshold value alarm are set to far apart there are long delay times until an alarm is detected. However, when the limits are too narrow often false alarms are occurring. Hence, in practice a so-called “extreme limit” or an option such as “all alarms off for two minutes” is set. Further, the threshold value alarm system is not suitable for the case that a plurality of signals has to be monitored by an alarm system.
With respect to the prior art attention is drawn to the German patent publication DE 35 23 232 C2. From this document a fire alarm system is known for detecting and outputting of an analog value corresponding to a change in the physical appearance of the environmental conditions. Therein are provided a sampling apparatus for sampling an analog retrieval signal within a determined time period outputted from a detection section, a data processing apparatus for calculating a mean value from the detected data, as well as a storage apparatus in which these detected data can be stored and an alarm apparatus which indicates the presence of a fire after evaluation of the mean value. It is characteristic that the data processing apparatus is such that the detected data are sequentially written into the storage apparatus and continuously a running mean value is calculated from a certain number of the most recently stored detected data wherein the oldest stored value of the detected data according to the sequence is respectively replaced by the newest.
Further, from DE 31 27 324 A1 a method and an arrangement for increasing the response sensitivity and the safety against disturbances in a system for indicating dangers, in particular fires, is known.
From both above mentioned documents it is in particular not known to calculate a deviation parameter from the subsequent measurement values so that the method used to trigger the alarm would be adaptive and would have the ability to learn. Therefore, both above methods are not capable to adapt to, e.g. a time variation of the detector sensitivity.
Finally, DE 44 17 574 C2 relates to detection of a patient alarm using a target mode. In this method dynamic limits are defined for an intended change of physiologic parameters of a patient and an alarm is then generated when the measured parameter values lie outside of the dynamic limits. Thus, this document merely discloses a variation of the known threshold alarm.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to avoid the drawbacks of the prior and, in particular, to improve a method of the kind mentioned-above in which an “alarm situation” is faster recognized and which has a lower rate of false alarms compared to the prior art.
As far as the method aspect of the present invention is concerned this object is solved in that in a first step, for measurement signal values subsequent in time, in an adjustable time window the mean value thereof and the corresponding deviation of these measurement signal values from the mean value is calculated, in that in a second step each further subsequent measurement signal value is compared to the mean value and weighted with the deviation in order to obtain a corresponding evaluation quantity or evaluation parameter, and in that in a third step an outlier state is detected when or if the evaluation quantity exceeds or passes an adjustable outlier parameter, whereas when or if the evaluation quantity exceeds or passes an adjustable alarm parameter an alarm state is detected which indicates the presence of a significant drift or jump of the measurement signal values.
Therefore, in the method according to the invention two phases can be distinguished wherein in a first phase a time window is provided in which the characteristic course of the measurement signa
Barbee Manual L.
Wachsman Hal
LandOfFree
Method and device for detecting drifts, jumps and/or... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and device for detecting drifts, jumps and/or..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and device for detecting drifts, jumps and/or... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3013735